Devices for illuminating defended subjectivities in complex qualitative case interpretation: an example from recent BNIM practice

Authors:
Susan FlynnUniversity of Dublin, Ireland

Search for other papers by Susan Flynn in
Current site
Google ScholarClose
and
Tom WengrafFormerly Middlesex University, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Tom Wengraf in
Current site
Google ScholarClose
Article Category:
Research Article
Copyright:
© Policy Press 2021
Online Publication Date:
25 Jun 2021
Pages:
105–119
Publisher:
Policy Press
Volume/Issue:
Volume 14: Issue 2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1332/147867321X16218659135374
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
Buy article/chapter (GBP  £25.00)

For a long time now, fairly central to what has emerged as ‘psychosocial studies’ has been the notion of psychosocietal ‘defendedness’. This is the psychoanalytic notion that people (not excluding social science researchers) must be understood in general as being ‘defended subjectivities’. This immediately raises the question of the ‘defended researcher’ being sensitive to – and having procedures for detecting and interpreting the working of – such ‘defensiveness’ in the interactions of their subjects and themselves. Biography-based research raises these issues particularly strongly. One such method, known as the ‘biographical narrative interpretative method’ (BNIM) of interviewing and case interpretation, has been used in the anglophone world for more than 20 years. While BNIM prescribes an audit trail for its interpretative practices, it is rare to discover a fully audited sequence of components, and rarer still to have access to illuminating free-associative fieldnotes that catalogue the researcher’s evolving subjectivity. This article discusses defendedness in a case interpretation within a BNIM-using PhD. We conclude that, to defeat the defensiveness of both researcher and peer-auditor (the co-authors of this article), several BNIM techniques need to be used systematically and that, in particular, a ‘private and confidential’ independent peer audit is valuable under certain conditions, and should be provided for in any research proposal. Through peer audit, the researcher can be (usually uncomfortably) sensitised to new possibilities about their otherwise inadequately understood defended processes and conclusions.

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Fifth Edition, Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Arcari, S. (2003) Timing and timelessness in group analysis: the unconscious setting of the group, Group Analysis, 26(1): 87–96. doi: 10.1177/0533316403036001204

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Aviv, A. (2010) Where intersubjectivity and group analysis meet, International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 60(1): 91–109.  doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2010.60.1.91

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bargh, J.A. and Morsella, E. (2008) The unconscious mind, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1): 73–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00064.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bion, W.R. (1961) Experiences in Groups and Other Papers, London: Tavistock Publications.

  • Bogardus, E.S. (1926) The group interview, Journal of Applied Sociology, 10(1926): 372–82. 

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2020) Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other Pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bryman, A. (2016) Social Research Methods, 5th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carcary, M. (2009) The research audit trial–enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry, Electronic Journal on Business Research Methods, 7(1): 11–24.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J. and Wengraf, T. (2000) The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples, London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clarke, S. (2002) Learning from experience: psycho-social research methods in the social sciences, Qualitative Research, 2(2): 173–94. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200203

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Corbally, M. and O’Neill, C. (2014) An introduction to the biographical narrative interpretative method, Nurse Researcher, 21(5): 34–9. doi: 10.7748/nr.21.5.34.e1237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Corban, J. and Strauss, A. (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research, 4th edn, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2008) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 3rd edn, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Feyerabend, P. (2010) Against Method, London: Verso.

  • Flick, U., von Kardoff, E. and Steinke, I. (2004) A Companion to Qualitative Research, London: Sage Publications.

  • Flynn, S. and McGregor, C. (2018) Recessionary Tales: An Investigation into How Intellectually Disabled Young People, and their Families, Experienced the Economic Downturn, Galway: Aran Repository.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flynn, S. (2019a) Irish intellectual disability services for children and austerity measures: The qualitative impact of recession through framework method. Child Care in Practice. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2019.1665499

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flynn, S. (2019b) Life stories of the economic recession: Biographical Narrative Interpretative Method (BNIM) and the lived experience of disability in times of austerity, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 21(1): 58–66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Foulkes, S.H. (1946) Principles and practice of group therapy, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1946(10): 85–9. 

  • Foulkes, S.H. (1948) Introduction to Group Analytic Psychotherapy, London: Karnac.

  • Freeman, M. (2006) Life ‘on holiday?’ In defense of big stories, Narrative Inquiry, 16(1): 131–8. doi: 10.1075/ni.16.1.17fre

  • Freeman, M. (2010) ‘Even amidst’: rethinking narrative coherence, in M. Hyvannen, L. Hyden, M. Saarenheimo and M. Tamboukou (eds) Beyond Narrative Coherence, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp 167–87.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Freeman, M. (2011) Stories, big and small: toward a synthesis, Theory and Psychology, 21(1): 114–21. doi: 10.1177/0959354309354394

  • Freud, A. (1936) The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, London: Karnac Books.

  • Frosh, S. (2019) New voices in psychosocial studies: introduction, in S. Frosh (ed) New Voices in Psychosocial Studies, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 1–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garfield, S., Reavey, P. and Kotecha, M. (2010) Footprints in a toxic landscape: reflexivity and validation in the free association narrative interview (FANI) method, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(2): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/14780880903304535

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gentile, J. and Macrone, M. (2016) Feminine Law: Freud, Free Speech, and the Voice of Desire, London: Karnac Books.

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York, NY: Doubleday.

  • Gordon, R. (1991) Intersubjectivity and the efficacy of group psychotherapy, Group Analysis, 24(1): 41–51. doi: 10.1177/0533316491241008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hoffman, I.Z. (2006) The myth of free association and the potentials of the analytic process, The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(Pt 1): 43-61. doi: 10.1516/15BK-FREH-NRK6-0MNP

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2000) Doing Qualitative Research Differently, London: Sage Publications.

  • Hopper, E. (2001) The social unconscious: theoretical considerations, Group Analysis, 34(1): 9–27. doi: 10.1177/05333160122077686

  • Hopper, E. (2003) The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  • Klein, M. (1932) The Psycho-Analysis of Children, New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.

  • Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1972) Qualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Lothane, H.Z. (2018) Free association as the foundation of the psychoanalytic method and psychoanalysis as a historical science, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 38(6): 416–34. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2018.1480225

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Macmillan, M. (2011) The reliability and validity of Freud’s methods of free association and interpretation, Psychological Inquiry, 12(3): 167–75. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1203_03

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Merton, R.K., Fiske, M. and Kendall, P.L. (1990) The Focused Interview, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Ogden, T. (2008) Bion’s four principles of mental functioning, in T. Ogden (ed) Rediscovering Psychoanalysis: Thinking, Dreaming, Learning, Forgetting, London: Routledge, pp 90–114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Paulhus, D.L., Fridhandler, B. and Hayes, S. (1997) Psychological defence: contemporary theory and research, in S. Briggs, R. Hogan, R. Goode and J.W. Johnson (eds) Handbook of Personality Psychology, Boston, MA: Academic Press, pp 543–79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pines, M. (1996) The self as a group: the group as a self, Group Analysis, 29(2): 183–90. doi: 10.1177/0533316496292006

  • Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London: Routledge. 

  • Reissman, C.K (2000) Stigma and everyday resistance practices: Childless women in South India. Gender & Society, 14(1): 11-135. doi: 10.1177/089124300014001007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reissman, C.K. (2004) Emotions, misunderstandings, and the shaping of interpretation: looking back on a case study, Unpublished MSS, communication from the author.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reissman, C.K. (2015) Entering the hall of mirrors: reflexivity and narrative research, in A. De Fina and A. Georgakopoulou (eds) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 1st edn, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp 219–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schutz, A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World, G. Walsh and F. Lehnert (trans), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

  • Silverman, D. (2017) Doing Qualitative Research, 5th edn, London: Sage Publications.

  • Skogstad, W. (2018) Psychoanalytic observation – the mind as research instrument, Organizational and Social Dynamics, 4(1): 67–87. 

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Strier, R. (2007) Anti-oppressive research in social work: a preliminary definition, The British Journal of Social Work, 37(5): 857–71. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl062

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Szykierski, D. (2010) The traumatic roots of containment: the evolution of Bion’s metapsychology, The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 79(4): 935–68. doi: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2010.tb00472.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales from the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Wengraf, T. (2000) Uncovering the general from within the particular: from contingencies to typologies in the understanding of cases, in P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat and T. Wengraf (eds) The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples, London: Routledge, pp 140-164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wengraf, T. (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographical Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods, London: Sage Publications.

  • Wengraf, T. (2018) Researching dated, situated defended and deciding/evolving subjectivities by biographic-narrative interview, in K. Stamenova and R.D. Hinshelwood (eds) Methods of Research into the Unconscious, London: Routledge, pp. 211-238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wengraf, T. (2020) BNIM Short Guide and Detailed Manual. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tom-Wengraf

  • Wengraf, T. (2021) BNIM3 Quick Outline Sketch 333. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tom-Wengraf

Susan FlynnUniversity of Dublin, Ireland

Search for other papers by Susan Flynn in
Current site
Google ScholarClose
and
Tom WengrafFormerly Middlesex University, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Tom Wengraf in
Current site
Google ScholarClose

flynnsusan437@gmail.com
tom.wengraf@gmail.com

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 90 90 11
Full Text Views 11 11 0
PDF Downloads 11 11 1

Altmetrics

Dimensions