Based on an employer-focused political economy framework, this qualitative study investigates how employers are represented in and affected by the policymaking of in-work benefits (IWBs), given employers’ political status and labour market conditions. Respondents addressed the importance of employers’ tacit support of the wage subsidies funded by the government. Arguably, it was considered that IWBs did not have a direct impact on wages, but they subsidised employers as a constraint against the minimum wage, boosted the workforce’s availability, and reduced recruitment costs for employers. This research substantiates the understanding of IWBs by integrating the perspectives of policy stakeholders and expands IWBs’ case studies in an authoritarian context.
Au-Yeung, T.C. (2021) The normative construction of and contestation over in-work benefits in Hong Kong: a moral economy approach, Social Policy & Society, FirstView, 1–17.
Bertram, E. (2013) Doors, floors, ladders, and nets: social provision in the New American labor market, Politics and Society, 41(1): 29–72. doi: 10.1177/0032329212473073
Bonoli, G. (2010) The political economy of active labor-market policy, Politics and Society, 38(4): 435–57. doi: 10.1177/0032329210381235
Bredgaard, T. (2018) Employers and active labour market policies: typologies and evidence, Social Policy and Society, 17(3): 365–77. doi: 10.1017/S147474641700015X
Calnitsky, D. (2020) The employer response to the guaranteed annual income, Socio-Economic Review, 18(2): 493–517. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwy009
Carstensen, M.B. and Hansen, M.P. (2019) Legitimation as justification: foregrounding public philosophies in explanations of gradual ideational change, European Journal of Political Research, 58(2): 582–602. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12302
Clasen, J. (2020) Subsidizing wages or supplementing transfers? The politics and ambiguity of in‐work benefits, Social Policy and Administration, 54(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1111/spol.12488
Clegg, D. (2017) Unemployment benefit and labour market policies in Europe, in P. Kennett and N. Lendvai-Bainton (eds) Handbook of European Social Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 265–83.
Cousins, M. (2014) In-work benefits: effective social protection or ‘emperor’s new clothes’?, European Journal of Social Security, 16(2): 100–21. doi: 10.1177/138826271401600201
Dean, H. (2012) Welcome relief or indecent subsidy? The implications of wage top-up schemes, Policy and Politics, 40(3): 305–21. doi: 10.1332/030557312X626622
Dinan, S. (2019) A typology of activation incentives, Social Policy & Administration, 53(1): 1–15.
Dwyer, P. (2020) Questions of conduct and social justice: the ethics of welfare conditionality within UK social security, in A. Eleveld, T. Kampen and J. Arts (eds) Welfare to Work in Contemporary European Welfare States, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 189–209.
Emmel, N. (2013) Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach, London: SAGE.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Power and distributional regimes, Politics and Society, 14(2): 223–56. doi: 10.1177/003232928501400204
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001) Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state, in P. Hall and D. Soskice (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 145–83.
Farnsworth, K. (2020) Social, corporate, occupational: the whole economy of welfare, in N. Ellison and T. Haux (eds) Handbook on Society and Social Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 434–47.
Fong, B. (2017) In-between liberal authoritarianism and electoral authoritarianism: Hong Kong’s democratization under Chinese sovereignty, 1997–2016, Democratization, 24(4): 724–50. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1232249
Fong, B.C.H. (2014) The partnership between the Chinese government and Hong Kong’s capitalist class: implications for HKSAR governance, 1997–2012, The China Quarterly, 217: 195–220. doi: 10.1017/S0305741014000307
Frøyland, K., Andreassen, T.A. and Innvær, S. (2019) Contrasting supply-side, demand-side and combined approaches to labour market integration, Journal of Social Policy, 48(2): 311–28.
Gore, T. (2005) Extending employability or solving employers’ recruitment problems? Demand-led approaches as an instrument of labour market policy, Urban Studies, 42(2): 341–53. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000316182
Gough, I. (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Grimshaw, D. (2005) Using qualitative data to understand employer behaviour in low-wage labour markets, in S. Bazen, C. Lucifora and W. Salverda (eds) Job Quality and Employer Behaviour, London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp 111–31.
Grover, C. (2016) Social Security and Wage Poverty: Historical and Policy Aspects of Supplementing Wages in Britain and Beyond, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hacker, J.S. and Pierson, P. (2002) Business power and social policy: employers and the formation of the American welfare state, Politics and Society, 30(2): 277–325. doi: 10.1177/0032329202030002004
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism, in P. Hall and D. Soskice (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 1–68.
Ingold, J. (2020) Employers’ perspectives on benefit conditionality in the UK and Denmark, Social Policy and Administration, 54(2): 236–49. doi: 10.1111/spol.12552
Ingold, J. and Stuart, M. (2015) The demand-side of active labour market policies: a regional study of employer engagement in the Work Programme, Journal of Social Policy, 44(3): 443–62. doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000890
Jeroslow, P. (2013) The Earned Income Tax credit as an anti-poverty programme: palliative or cure?, in G. Ramia, K. Farnsworth and Z. Irving (eds) Social Policy Review 25, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 149–66.
Kenworthy, L. (2019) Do employment-conditional earnings subsidies work, in B. Cantillon, T. Goedemé and J. Hills (eds) Decent Incomes for All: Improving Policies in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 154–75.
Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge.
Korpi, W. (2006) Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: protagonists, consenters, and antagonists, World Politics, 58(2): 167–206. doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0026
Lapadat, J. (2010) Thematic analysis, in A. Mills, G. Durepos and E. Wiebe (eds) Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, London: SAGE, pp 926–27.
Lee, E.W.Y. (2005) The renegotiation of the social pact in Hong Kong: economic globalisation, socio-economic change, and local politics, Journal of Social Policy, 34(2): 293–310. doi: 10.1017/S0047279404008591
Leigh, A. (2010) Who benefits from the Earned Income Tax Credit? Incidence among recipients, coworkers and firms, The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1): 1–41.
Leung, C.Y. (2014) Policy Address, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.
Marchal, S., Marx, I. and Verbist, G. (2018) Income support policies for the working poor, in H. Lohmann and I. Marx (eds) Handbook on in-Work Poverty, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 213–27.
Mares, I. (2003) The sources of business interest in social insurance: sectoral versus national differences, World Politics, 55(2): 229–58. doi: 10.1353/wp.2003.0012
Marques, J. (2010) Organized business and social policy in a comparative context, in J. Marques and P. Utting (eds) Business, Politics and Public Policy: Implications for Inclusive Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp 30–62.
Martin, C.J. and Swank, D. (2012) The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J.P. (2015) Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: Stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(1): 1–29. doi: 10.1186/s40173-015-0032-y
Millar, J. and Bennett, F. (2017) Universal credit: assumptions, contradictions and virtual reality, Social Policy and Society, 16(2): 169–82. doi: 10.1017/S1474746416000154
Millar, M., Gray, J., Rooney, C. and Crosse, R. (2018) The (in) adequacy of in-work benefits in Irish lone parent labour market activation policy, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 26(3): 379–400.
Neumark, D. (2016) Policy levers to increase jobs and increase income from work after the Great Recession, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(1): 1–38. doi: 10.1186/s40173-016-0064-y
Nijhuis, D. (2019) Analyzing the role of business in welfare state development, in D. Nijhuis (ed) Business Interests and the Development of the Modern Welfare State, London, Routledge, pp 1–27.
O’Connor, J. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St Martin’s Press.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2011) Taxation and Employment, OECD Tax Policy Studies, No. 21, Paris: OECD Publishing, doi: 10.1787/9789264120808-en.
Offe, C. (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Paster, T. (2015) Bringing power back in: a review of the literature on the role of business in welfare state politics, MPIfG Discussion Paper, 15/3, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2588617.
Redding, G., Wong, G.Y.Y. and Leung, W.K.W. (2014) Hong Kong: hybrid capitalism as catalyst, in M. Witt and G. Redding (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 33–54.
Rubery, J., Grimshaw, D., Keizer, A. and Johnson, M. (2018) Challenges and contradictions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work, Work, Employment and Society, 32(3): 509–27. doi: 10.1177/0950017017751790
SLW (Secretary for Labour and Welfare Bureau) (2015) Press release (in Chinese), https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201506/21/P201506210823.htm.
SLW (Secretary for Labour and Welfare Bureau) (2016) Speech at HKIHRM Annual Conference, https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201611/24/P2016112400330.htm.
Swenson, P.A. (2004) Varieties of capitalist interests: power, institutions, and the regulatory welfare state in the United States and Sweden, Studies in American Political Development, 18(1): 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X0400001X
Sykes, J., Križ, K., Edin, K. and Halpern-Meekin, S. (2015) Dignity and dreams: what the earned income tax credit means to low-income families, American Sociological Review, 80(2): 243–67. doi: 10.1177/0003122414551552
Tach, L., Halpern-Meekin, S., Edin, K. and Amorim, M. (2019) ‘As good as money in the bank’: building a personal safety net with the earned income tax credit, Social Problems, 66(2): 274–93. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spy001
Van der Aa, P. and van Berkel, R. (2014) Innovating job activation by involving employers, International Social Security Review, 67(2): 11–27. doi: 10.1111/issr.12036
van Gestel, N., Oomens, S. and Buwalda, E. (2019) From quasi‐markets to public–private networks: employers’ engagement in public employment services, Social Policy and Administration, 53(3): 434–48. doi: 10.1111/spol.12469
Vandelannoote, D. and Verbist, G. (2020) The impact of in-work benefits on work incentives and poverty in four European countries, Journal of European Social Policy, 30(2): 144–57. doi: 10.1177/0958928719891314
Vlandas, T. (2013) The politics of in-work benefits: the case of the ‘active income of solidarity’ in France, French Politics, 11(2): 117–42. doi: 10.1057/fp.2013.6
Watson, S. and Arunachalam, R. (2018) Firms and social protection: an event study, Comparative Political Studies, 51(14): 1974–2021. doi: 10.1177/0010414018774375
Wong, M.Y.H. (2014) The politics of the minimum wage in Hong Kong, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(4): 735–52. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2014.906641
Wong, M.Y.H. (2017) Discussing without deciding, deciding without acting: veto players in Hong Kong, and Beijing’s response, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(4): 347–61. doi: 10.1177/2057891116682322
Wong, S.H.W. (2012) Authoritarian co-optation in the age of globalisation: evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(2): 182–209. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2012.668348
|May 2022 onwards||Past Year||Past 30 Days|
|Full Text Views||570||411||3|