Is research the new advocacy? Mobilising social science research through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’

Authors:
Kaitlin SchwanUniversity of Toronto, Canada

Search for other papers by Kaitlin Schwan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Naomi NicholsTrent University Otonabee College, Canada

Search for other papers by Naomi Nichols in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Jayne MalenfantMcGill University, Canada

Search for other papers by Jayne Malenfant in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Advocacy coalitions have played an increasingly critical role in evidence-based policy development. Despite this, little is known about how such coalitions leverage research to influence policy. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study explores how a multi-sectoral advocacy coalition seeks to shape Canadian food security policy through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’. We explore four of the coalition’s strategies: (1) shaping policymakers’ thinking and priorities while responding to governments’ needs; (2) utilising research to help governments achieve political ‘wins’ while advancing the cause; (3) using research to broker relationships between ‘community’, government, and the coalition; and (4) mobilising research to ‘bring the sector along’.

  • Bogenschneider, K. and Corbett, T.J. (2010) Family policy: becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy, Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3): 783803. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00730.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brisbois, M.C., Girling, K. and Findlay, S. (2018) Academics should build rapport with government’s policy analysts, Nature, 555: 16574. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-02831-3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cairney, P. (2016) The Politics of Evidence-based Policy Making, New York: Springer.

  • Cairney, P. and Kwiatkowski, R. (2017) How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine Insights from psychology and policy studies, Palgrave Communications, 3(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caplan, N. (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization, American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3): 45970. doi: 10.1177/000276427902200308

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Damschroder, L.J., Aron, D.C., Keith, R.E., Kirsh, S.R., Alexander, J.A. and Lowery, J.C. (2009) Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science, Implementation Science, 4(1): 50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doberstein, C. (2016) Building a Collaborative Advantage: Network Governance and Homelessness Policy-making in Canada, Vancouver: UBC Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunn, G. and Laing, M. (2017) Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE), Environmental Science & Policy, 76: 14652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Funke, N., Huitema, D., Petersen, A. and Nienaber, S. (2021) The roles of experts and expert‐based information in the advocacy coalition framework: conceptual and empirical considerations based on the acid mine drainage case study in Gauteng, South Africa, Policy Studies Journal, 49(3): 785810. doi: 10.1111/psj.12409

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C.M. and Ingold, K. (2018) The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program, in C.M. Weible and P.A. Sabatier (eds) Theories of the Policy Process, 4th edn, New York: Routledge, pp 13571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lofland, J., Snow, D.A., Anderson, L. and Lofland, L. (2005) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lomas, J. (2007) The in-between world of knowledge brokering, BMJ, 334(7585): 12932. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE

  • Macnaughton, E., Nelson, G. and Goering, P. (2013) Bringing politics and evidence together: policy entrepreneurship and the conception of the At Home/Chez Soi Housing First Initiative for addressing homelessness and mental illness in Canada, Social Science & Medicine, 82: 100107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Main, T.J. (2016) Homelessness in New York City: Policymaking from Koch to de Blasio, New York, NY: New York University Press.

  • Newson, R., King, L., Rychetnik, L., Milat, A. and Bauman, A. (2018) Looking both ways: a review of methods for assessing research impacts on policy and the policy utilisation of research, Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1): 5467. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0310-4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nichols, N. (2014) Youth Work: An Institutional Ethnography of Youth Homelessness, Toronto, ON: The University of Toronto Press.

  • Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H. (2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Loernc, T., Woodman, J. and Thomas, J. (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers, Health Services Research, 14(1): 213. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oxman, A.D., Lewin, S., Lavis, J.N. and Fretheim, A. (2009) Support tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP) 15: engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking, Health Research Policy and Systems, 7(1): S15. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-15

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, B.G. (2017) What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program, Policy and Society, 36(3): 38596. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sabatier, P.A. (1987) Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: an advocacy coalition framework, Knowledge, 8(4): 64992. doi: 10.1177/0164025987008004005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sabatier, P.A. and Weible, C.M. (2007) The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications, in P. Sabatier (ed) Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Routledge, pp 189222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shinn, M. (2007) Waltzing with a monster: bringing research to bear on public policy, Journal of Social Issues, 63(1): 21531.

  • Smith, D.E. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

  • Smith, D.E. (1999) Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Smith, D.E. (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People, Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.

  • Spaapen, J. and Van Drooge, L. (2011) Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment, Research Evaluation, 20(3): 21118. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876742

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ward, V., Smith, S., House, A. and Hamer, S. (2012) Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy, Social Science & Medicine, 74(3): 297304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C.M. (2008) Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis, Policy Studies Journal, 36(4): 61535. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. and McQueen, K. (2009) Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Studies Journal, 37(1):12140. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A., Jenkins-Smith, H.C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A.D. and deLeon, P. (2011) A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue, Policy Studies Journal, 39(3): 34960. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weiss, C. (1977) Research for policy’s sake: the enlightenment function of social research, Policy Analysis, 3(Fall): 53145.

Kaitlin SchwanUniversity of Toronto, Canada

Search for other papers by Kaitlin Schwan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Naomi NicholsTrent University Otonabee College, Canada

Search for other papers by Naomi Nichols in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Jayne MalenfantMcGill University, Canada

Search for other papers by Jayne Malenfant in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 327 325 24
Full Text Views 324 324 24
PDF Downloads 130 130 8

Altmetrics

Dimensions