Changing circumstances and new basic premises: turning the affordability and feasibility relationship on its head: a reply to ‘The big tax hikes that make UBI “affordable” could be used to cut poverty in more targeted ways’ by Donald Hirsch 1
-
Hirsch, D. (2023) The big tax hikes that make UBI ‘affordable’ could be used to cut poverty in more targeted ways, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1): 163–5, doi: 10.1332/175982721X16702576209751.
-
Johnson, M., Johnson, E. and Nettle, D. (2022) Are ‘red wall’ constituencies really opposed to progressive policy? Examining the impact of materialist narratives for Universal Basic Income, British Politics, doi: 10.1057/s41293-022-00220-z.
-
Johnson, M., Johnson, E., Webber, L.F., Reed, H. and Wildman, J. (2021) Modelling the size, cost and health impacts of Universal Basic Income, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 459–76, doi: 10.1007/s10742-021-00246-8.
-
Reed, H., Johnson, M.T., Lansley, S., Johnson, E.A., Stark, G. and Pickett, K.E. (2023) Universal Income is affordable and feasible: evidence from UK micro-economic modelling, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1): 146–62, doi: 10.1332/175982721X16702368352393.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 89 | 89 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 378 | 378 | 144 |
| PDF Downloads | 191 | 191 | 84 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk