An untested premise: would voters really support redistribution through UBI which left many of them worse off? A reply to ‘Changing circumstances and new basic premises: turning the affordability and feasibility relationship on its head’ by Howard Robert Reed et al 1

Author:
Donald HirschLoughborough University, UK

Search for other papers by Donald Hirsch in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
  • Hirsch, D. (2023) The big tax hikes that make UBI ‘affordable’ could be used to cut poverty in more targeted ways: a reply to ‘Universal Basic Income is affordable and feasible: evidence from UK economic microsimulation modelling’ by Howard Robert Reed et al, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1): 1635, doi: 10.1332/175982721X16702576055509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reed, H.R., Johnson, M.T., Lansley, S., Aidan Johnson, E., Stark, G. and Pickett, K.E. (2023a) Universal Basic Income is affordable and feasible: evidence from UK economic microsimulation modelling, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1): 14662, doi: 10.1332/175982721X16702368352393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reed, H.R., Johnson, M.T., Lansley, S., Johnson, E.A., Stark, G. and Pickett, K.E. (2023b) Changing circumstances and new basic premises: turning the affordability and feasibility relationship on its head: a reply to ‘The big tax hikes that make UBI “affordable” could be used to cut poverty in more targeted ways’ by Donald Hirsch, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1): 1668, doi: 10.1332/175982722X16703911505586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Donald HirschLoughborough University, UK

Search for other papers by Donald Hirsch in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 46 46 0
Full Text Views 332 332 142
PDF Downloads 173 173 79

Altmetrics

Dimensions