The attributional process, defined as the process of inferring the causes of the events that surround individuals in their daily lives, can potentially shape the understanding of poverty and wealth. For instance, it might influence how people behave, what they expect from poor and wealthy groups in their society, and how they judge them. However, the existing measures that capture these attributional phenomena have several limitations. Some attributional factors lack empirical support, or some implemented items lack relevance in contemporary society. Therefore, the present study is aimed to deepen the understanding of the attributional process by reviewing the factor structure of the poverty (Cozzarelli et al, 2001) and wealth attribution scales (Bullock et al, 2003), as well as adapting and verifying the validity of these scales among the Mexican population. To do so, we revised the factor structure of the poverty and wealth attribution scales to create a unified scale. We back-translated the original items, conducted exploratory and confirmatory analyses, restructured the scale’s factors, and related them with other covariates. Our results indicate that these scales uniquely differentiate between internal and external attributions, demonstrating that the new factor structure is better for measuring attributional processes regarding the perceived causes of poverty and wealth than those used in previous research.
Adler, N.E., Epel, E.S., Castellazzo, G. and Ickovics, J.R. (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women, Health Psychology, 19(6): 586–92. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2005) Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities, Journal of Public Economics, 89: 897–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009
Antonio-Villa, N., Fernandez-Chirino, L., Pisanty-Alatorre, J., Mancilla-Galindo, J., Kammar-García, A., Vargas-Vásquez, A. et al. (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of the impact of sociodemographic inequalities on adverse outcomes and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico City, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 74(5): 785–92. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab577.
Bobbio, A., Canova, L. and Manganelli, A.M. (2010) Conservative ideology, economic conservatism, and causal attributions for poverty and wealth, Current Psychology, 29: 222–34. doi: 10.1007/s12144-010-9086-6
Bullock, H.E. (1999) Attributions for poverty: a comparison of middle-class and welfare recipient attitudes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29: 2059–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1999.tb02295.x
Bullock, H.E. and Fernald, J.L. (2005) Predicting support for eliminating the dividend tax: the role of framing and attributions for wealth, Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5: 49–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00055.x
Bullock, H.E., Fraser Wyche, K. and Williams, W.R. (2001) Media images of the poor, Journal of Social Issues, 57(2): 229–46. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00210
Bullock, H.E., Williams, W.R. and Limbert, W.M. (2003) Predicting support for welfare policies: the impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality, Journal of Poverty, 7(3): 35–56. doi: 10.1300/J134v07n03_03.
Carretero-Dios, H. and Pérez, C. (2007) Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: considerations about test selection in psychological research, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3): 863–82.
Castillo, J.C. and Rivera-Gutiérrez, M. (2018) Dimensiones comunes a las atribuciones de pobreza y riqueza [Common dimensions for poverty and wealth attributions], Psykhe, 27(2): 1–10. doi: 10.7764/psykhe.27.2.1152
CONEVAL (2018) Medición de la pobreza en México [Measuring poverty in Mexico], https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/PobrezaInicio.aspx.
Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A.V. and Tagler, M.J. (2001) Attitudes toward poor people and attributions for poverty, Journal of Social Issues, 57(2): 207–27. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00209
Dawtry, R.J., Sutton, R.M. and Sibley, C.G. (2015) Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: from social sampling to attitudes to redistribution, Psychological Science, 26: 1389–400. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586560
Edmiston, D. (2018) The poor ‘sociological imagination’ of the rich: explaining attitudinal divergence towards welfare, inequality, and redistribution, Social Policy Administration, 52: 983–97. doi: 10.1111/spol.12366
Feagin, J.R. (1972) Poverty: we still believe that God helps those who help themselves, Psychology Today, 6(6): 101–110.
Feagin, J.R. (1975) Subordinating the Poor: Welfare and American Beliefs, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Forgas, J.P., Morris, S.L. and Furnham, A. (1982) Lay explanations of wealth: attributions for economic success, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(5): 381–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1982.tb00873.x
Furnham, A. (1982) Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain, British Journal of Social Psychology, 21: 311–22. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.1982.tb00553.x
García-Castro, J.D., García-Sánchez, E., Montoya-Lozano, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2021) The perception of economic inequality in everyday life: my friends with the most and least money, Asian Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12476
Hambleton, R.K. (2005) Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures, in R. Hambleton, P. Merenda and S. Spielberger (eds) Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 3–38.
Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi: 10.1037/10628-000
Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.E., Foels, R. and Stewart, A.L. (2015) The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6): 1003–28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033
Hunt, M.O. (2004) Race/ethnicity and beliefs about wealth and poverty, Social Science Quarterly, 85: 827–53. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00247.x
Hunt, M.O. and Bullock, H. (2016) Ideologies and beliefs about poverty, in D. Brady and M. Burton Linda (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty, 1st edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 93–116. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199914050.013.6
Jaume, L., Etchezahar, E. and Cervone, N. (2012) La justificación del sistema económico y su relación con la orientación a la dominancia social [The justification of the economic system and its relation to the orientation towards social dominance], Boletín de Psicología, 106: 81–91.
Jordan, J.A., Lawler, J.R. and Bosson, J.K. (2021) Ambivalent classism: the importance of assessing hostile and benevolent ideologies about poor people, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 43(1): 46–67. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1828084
Kelley, H.H. (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15: 192–238.
Kluegel, J.R. and Smith, E.R. (1986) Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of what is and what Ought to be, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kraus, M.W. and Keltner, D. (2009) Signs of socioeconomic status: a thin-slicing approach, Psychological Science, 20(1): 99c106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.x
Lepianka, D., van Oorschot, W. and Gelissen, J. (2009) Popular explanations of poverty: a critical discussion of empirical research, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 421–38. doi: 10.1017/S0047279409003092.
Lobato, R.M., Sainz, M. and García-Sánchez, E. (2020) Adaptation and validation of the Self-Censorship Orientation (SCO) scale into Spanish (Adaptación y validación de la escala de Orientación a la Autocensura (OAC) al Español), International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2): 310–41. doi: 10.1080/02134748.2020.1723367
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999) Sample size in factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 4(1): 84–99. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Nasser, R. (2007) Does subjective class predict the causal attribution for poverty?, Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4): 197–201. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2007.197.201
Osborne, D. and Weiner, B. (2015) A latent profile analysis of attributions for poverty: identifying response patterns underlying people’s willingness to help the poor, Personality and Individual Differences, 85: 149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.007
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. and Davidov, E. (2011) Basic personal values and the meaning of left–right political orientations in 20 countries, Political Psychology, 32(4): 537–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, http://web.mit.edu/r_v3.4.1/fullrefman.pdf.
Robinson, J.W. (2009) American poverty causes beliefs and structured inequality legitimation, Sociological Spectrum, 29(4): 489–518. doi: 10.1080/02732170902904681
Ross, L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process, in L. Berkowitz (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, London: Academic Press, pp 173–220. doi: 10.1016/S00652601(08)603573
Rosseel, Y. (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more, Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2): 1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sainz, M., Loughnan, S., Martínez, R., Moya, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020a) Dehumanization of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups decreases support for welfare policies via perceived wastefulness, International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1): 1–13. doi: 10.5334/irsp.414
Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Moya, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019a) Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: the convergence of socioeconomic status and humanity attributions, International Journal of Psychology, 54(4): 423–30. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12485
Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. and Moya, M. (2019b) Where does the money come from? Humanizing high socioeconomic status groups promotes income inequality, Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00771
Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Sutton, R.M., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. and Moya, M. (2020b) Less human, more to blame: animalizing poor people increases blame and decreases support for wealth redistribution, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(4): 546–59. doi: 10.1177/1368430219841135
Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis, Psychometrika, 66(4): 507–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics, Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tagler, M.J. and Cozzarelli, C. (2013) Feelings toward the poor and beliefs about the causes of poverty: the role of affective-cognitive consistency in help-giving, Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147: 517–39. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.718721
Watkins, M.W. (2000) Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [computer software], Ed & Psych Associates.
Weiner, B., Osborne, D. and Rudolph, U. (2011) An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: the political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15: 199–213. doi: 10.1177/1088868310387615
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2272 | 826 | 315 |
Full Text Views | 3372 | 2286 | 0 |
PDF Downloads | 877 | 286 | 0 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here