How do people understand the causes of poverty and wealth? A revised structural dimensionality of the attributions about poverty and wealth scales

Authors:
Mario Sainz Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and Universidad Nacional de Estudios a Distancia, Chile

Search for other papers by Mario Sainz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-5872
,
Juan Diego García-Castro Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica and Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social, Chile

Search for other papers by Juan Diego García-Castro in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9662-6547
,
Gloria Jiménez-Moya Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile

Search for other papers by Gloria Jiménez-Moya in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-6437
, and
Roberto M. Lobato Marbella International University Centre, Spain

Search for other papers by Roberto M. Lobato in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-7020
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

The attributional process, defined as the process of inferring the causes of the events that surround individuals in their daily lives, can potentially shape the understanding of poverty and wealth. For instance, it might influence how people behave, what they expect from poor and wealthy groups in their society, and how they judge them. However, the existing measures that capture these attributional phenomena have several limitations. Some attributional factors lack empirical support, or some implemented items lack relevance in contemporary society. Therefore, the present study is aimed to deepen the understanding of the attributional process by reviewing the factor structure of the poverty (Cozzarelli et al, 2001) and wealth attribution scales (Bullock et al, 2003), as well as adapting and verifying the validity of these scales among the Mexican population. To do so, we revised the factor structure of the poverty and wealth attribution scales to create a unified scale. We back-translated the original items, conducted exploratory and confirmatory analyses, restructured the scale’s factors, and related them with other covariates. Our results indicate that these scales uniquely differentiate between internal and external attributions, demonstrating that the new factor structure is better for measuring attributional processes regarding the perceived causes of poverty and wealth than those used in previous research.

  • Adler, N.E., Epel, E.S., Castellazzo, G. and Ickovics, J.R. (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women, Health Psychology, 19(6): 58692. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2005) Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities, Journal of Public Economics, 89: 897931. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Antonio-Villa, N., Fernandez-Chirino, L., Pisanty-Alatorre, J., Mancilla-Galindo, J., Kammar-García, A., Vargas-Vásquez, A. et al. (2021) Comprehensive evaluation of the impact of sociodemographic inequalities on adverse outcomes and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico City, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 74(5): 78592. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab577.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bobbio, A., Canova, L. and Manganelli, A.M. (2010) Conservative ideology, economic conservatism, and causal attributions for poverty and wealth, Current Psychology, 29: 22234. doi: 10.1007/s12144-010-9086-6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bullock, H.E. (1999) Attributions for poverty: a comparison of middle-class and welfare recipient attitudes, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29: 205982. doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1999.tb02295.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bullock, H.E. and Fernald, J.L. (2005) Predicting support for eliminating the dividend tax: the role of framing and attributions for wealth, Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5: 4966. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00055.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bullock, H.E., Fraser Wyche, K. and Williams, W.R. (2001) Media images of the poor, Journal of Social Issues, 57(2): 22946. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00210

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bullock, H.E., Williams, W.R. and Limbert, W.M. (2003) Predicting support for welfare policies: the impact of attributions and beliefs about inequality, Journal of Poverty, 7(3): 3556. doi: 10.1300/J134v07n03_03.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carretero-Dios, H. and Pérez, C. (2007) Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: considerations about test selection in psychological research, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3): 86382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castillo, J.C. and Rivera-Gutiérrez, M. (2018) Dimensiones comunes a las atribuciones de pobreza y riqueza [Common dimensions for poverty and wealth attributions], Psykhe, 27(2): 110. doi: 10.7764/psykhe.27.2.1152

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CONEVAL (2018) Medición de la pobreza en México [Measuring poverty in Mexico], https://www.coneval.org.mx/Medicion/Paginas/PobrezaInicio.aspx.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A.V. and Tagler, M.J. (2001) Attitudes toward poor people and attributions for poverty, Journal of Social Issues, 57(2): 20727. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00209

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dawtry, R.J., Sutton, R.M. and Sibley, C.G. (2015) Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: from social sampling to attitudes to redistribution, Psychological Science, 26: 1389400. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586560

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edmiston, D. (2018) The poor ‘sociological imagination’ of the rich: explaining attitudinal divergence towards welfare, inequality, and redistribution, Social Policy Administration, 52: 98397. doi: 10.1111/spol.12366

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feagin, J.R. (1972) Poverty: we still believe that God helps those who help themselves, Psychology Today, 6(6): 101110.

  • Feagin, J.R. (1975) Subordinating the Poor: Welfare and American Beliefs, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Forgas, J.P., Morris, S.L. and Furnham, A. (1982) Lay explanations of wealth: attributions for economic success, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12(5): 38197. doi: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1982.tb00873.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furnham, A. (1982) Why are the poor always with us? Explanations for poverty in Britain, British Journal of Social Psychology, 21: 31122. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.1982.tb00553.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • García-Castro, J.D., García-Sánchez, E., Montoya-Lozano, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2021) The perception of economic inequality in everyday life: my friends with the most and least money, Asian Journal of Social Psychology. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12476

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hambleton, R.K. (2005) Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures, in R. Hambleton, P. Merenda and S. Spielberger (eds) Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi: 10.1037/10628-000

  • Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.E., Foels, R. and Stewart, A.L. (2015) The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6): 100328. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, M.O. (2004) Race/ethnicity and beliefs about wealth and poverty, Social Science Quarterly, 85: 82753. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00247.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, M.O. and Bullock, H. (2016) Ideologies and beliefs about poverty, in D. Brady and M. Burton Linda (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty, 1st edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 93116. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199914050.013.6

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaume, L., Etchezahar, E. and Cervone, N. (2012) La justificación del sistema económico y su relación con la orientación a la dominancia social [The justification of the economic system and its relation to the orientation towards social dominance], Boletín de Psicología, 106: 8191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jordan, J.A., Lawler, J.R. and Bosson, J.K. (2021) Ambivalent classism: the importance of assessing hostile and benevolent ideologies about poor people, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 43(1): 4667. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1828084

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kelley, H.H. (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15: 192238.

  • Kluegel, J.R. and Smith, E.R. (1986) Beliefs About Inequality: Americans’ Views of what is and what Ought to be, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kraus, M.W. and Keltner, D. (2009) Signs of socioeconomic status: a thin-slicing approach, Psychological Science, 20(1): 99c106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lepianka, D., van Oorschot, W. and Gelissen, J. (2009) Popular explanations of poverty: a critical discussion of empirical research, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 42138. doi: 10.1017/S0047279409003092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lobato, R.M., Sainz, M. and García-Sánchez, E. (2020) Adaptation and validation of the Self-Censorship Orientation (SCO) scale into Spanish (Adaptación y validación de la escala de Orientación a la Autocensura (OAC) al Español), International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2): 31041. doi: 10.1080/02134748.2020.1723367

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999) Sample size in factor analysis, Psychological Methods, 4(1): 8499. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nasser, R. (2007) Does subjective class predict the causal attribution for poverty?, Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4): 197201. doi: 10.3844/jssp.2007.197.201

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osborne, D. and Weiner, B. (2015) A latent profile analysis of attributions for poverty: identifying response patterns underlying people’s willingness to help the poor, Personality and Individual Differences, 85: 14954. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. and Davidov, E. (2011) Basic personal values and the meaning of left–right political orientations in 20 countries, Political Psychology, 32(4): 53761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, http://web.mit.edu/r_v3.4.1/fullrefman.pdf.

  • Robinson, J.W. (2009) American poverty causes beliefs and structured inequality legitimation, Sociological Spectrum, 29(4): 489518. doi: 10.1080/02732170902904681

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ross, L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process, in L. Berkowitz (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, London: Academic Press, pp 173220. doi: 10.1016/S00652601(08)603573

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more, Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2): 136. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sainz, M., Loughnan, S., Martínez, R., Moya, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2020a) Dehumanization of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups decreases support for welfare policies via perceived wastefulness, International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1): 113. doi: 10.5334/irsp.414

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Moya, M. and Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019a) Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: the convergence of socioeconomic status and humanity attributions, International Journal of Psychology, 54(4): 42330. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12485

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. and Moya, M. (2019b) Where does the money come from? Humanizing high socioeconomic status groups promotes income inequality, Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00771

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Sutton, R.M., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. and Moya, M. (2020b) Less human, more to blame: animalizing poor people increases blame and decreases support for wealth redistribution, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(4): 54659. doi: 10.1177/1368430219841135

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (2001) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis, Psychometrika, 66(4): 50714. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics, Boston, MA: Pearson.

  • Tagler, M.J. and Cozzarelli, C. (2013) Feelings toward the poor and beliefs about the causes of poverty: the role of affective-cognitive consistency in help-giving, Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 147: 51739. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.718721

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watkins, M.W. (2000) Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [computer software], Ed & Psych Associates.

  • Weiner, B., Osborne, D. and Rudolph, U. (2011) An attributional analysis of reactions to poverty: the political ideology of the giver and the perceived morality of the receiver, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15: 199213. doi: 10.1177/1088868310387615

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Mario Sainz Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and Universidad Nacional de Estudios a Distancia, Chile

Search for other papers by Mario Sainz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-5872
,
Juan Diego García-Castro Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica and Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social, Chile

Search for other papers by Juan Diego García-Castro in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9662-6547
,
Gloria Jiménez-Moya Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile

Search for other papers by Gloria Jiménez-Moya in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-6437
, and
Roberto M. Lobato Marbella International University Centre, Spain

Search for other papers by Roberto M. Lobato in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-7020

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2272 826 315
Full Text Views 3372 2286 0
PDF Downloads 877 286 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions