May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 24726 | 24726 | 7509 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 196 | 3 |
PDF Downloads | 169 | 169 | 4 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Navigating the context of the Swedish welfare system when unemployed, sick, or disabled is complex and multifaceted as it involves agencies governed by national, regional and municipal decision-making bodies, as well as different legal frameworks. Despite significant structural and organisational barriers, these agencies must collaborate around individual cases. The aim of this article is to gain an understanding of how welfare professionals make sense of the role of inter-agency collaboration when trying to address the support needs of long-term unemployed individuals with disabilities and/or ill-health. Focusing on sensemaking, as a form of knowledge claim, of those who work in frontline or coordinating roles on a local level draws attention to tensions between different institutional logics that are crucial for policy implementation. The analysis presented is based on data from 16 semi-structured interviews with welfare professionals from different agencies working in the same region of southern Sweden. Two key competing logics are highlighted: a work-first logic and a welfare logic. The findings show how welfare professionals seek to navigate through the competing logics by identifying alternative ways of working. By harmonising these logics, trying to fit them together in a hybrid logic, they attempt to find ways of meeting the needs of vulnerable individuals, but without challenging the structure and principles of Sweden’s overarching ‘work-first’ approach to social security.
Alm, S., Nelson, K. and Nieuwenhuis, R. (2019) The diminishing power of one? Welfare state retrenchment and rising poverty of single-adult households in Sweden 1988–2011, European Sociological Review, 36(2): 198–217. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcz053
Altemark, N. (2020) Avslagsmaskinen: Byråkrati och avhumanisering i svensk sjukförsäkring, Stockholm: Verbal.
Arlesten, S. (2019) Utvärdering av Arenasamverkan i GGVV: Samverkan, insyn och delaktighet i rehabiliteringsprocesser för arbetslösa, Värnamo: Finnvedens samordningsförbund.
Arlesten, S. and Ulmestig, R. (2021) ‘It may not be due to illness’: social rights for applicants for incapacity benefits, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 1(29): 67–83. doi: 10.1332/175982720x16052077354441
Battilana, J. and D’Aunno, T. (2009) Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency, in T.B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby and B. Leca (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 31–58.
Beatty, C., Fothergill, S., Houston, C. and Powell, R. (2010) Women on incapacity benefits, in P. Kemp (ed) Social Protection for a Post-Industrial World, Antwerp: Intersentia.
Bengtsson, M. and Jacobsson, K. (2018) The institutionalization of a new social cleavage: ideological influences, main reforms and social inequality outcomes of ‘the New Work strategy’, Sociologisk Forskning, 55(2–3): 155–77. doi: 10.37062/sf.55.18188
Berg, J. (2022) Spelet om arbetsförmedlingen, Stockholm: Carlsson.
Bornemark, J. (2020) Horisonten finns alltid kvar: om det bortglömda omdömet, Stockholm: Volante.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Considine, M. (2022) The Careless State: Reforming Australia’s Social Services, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Considine, M., Lewis, J.M., O’Sullivan, S. and Sol, E. (2015) Getting Welfare to Work: Street-level Governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands, Oxford: Open University Press.
Danermark, B. (2005) Samverkan – Himmel Eller Helvete? Malmö: Gleerups.
Davidsson, T. (2010) Utanförskapelsen. En diskursanalys av hur begreppet utanförskap artikulerades i den svenska riksdagsdebatten 2003–2006, Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 17(2): 149–69.
Davidsson, T. (2015) Understödets rationalitet: En genealogisk studie av arbetslinjen under kapitalismen, Malmö: Egalité.
Davidsson, T. (2017) Är arbete inkluderande? Ett kritiskt perspektiv på det tidiga 2000-talets arbetslinje, in T. Davisdsson and F. Petersson (eds) Social Exkludering: Perspektiv, Process, Problemkonstruktion, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Dunn, A. (2014) Rethinking Unemployment and the Work Ethic: Beyond the ‘Quasi-Titmuss’ Paradigm, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. (1991) Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp 232–63.
Fuertes, V., McQuaid, R.W. and Heidenreich, M. (2021) Institutional logics of service provision: the national and urban governance of activation policies in three European countries, Journal of European Social Policy, 31(1): 92–107. doi: 10.1177/0958928720974178
Glynn, M.A. and Lounsbury, M. (2005) From the critics’ corner: logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system, Journal of Management Studies, 42(5): 1031–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
Govender, L. (2023) Crumbs from the Rich Man’s Table? Municipal Labour Market Policies and Recognition of Welfare Recipients in Sweden. PhD Dissertation, Växjö, Sweden: Linnaeus University.
Harslöf, I. and Ulmestig, R. (2013) Changing Social Risks and Social Policy Responses in the Nordic Welfare States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heidenreich, M. and Rice, D. (2016) Integrating Social and Employment Policies in Europe: Active Inclusion and Challenges for Local Welfare Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hertz, M. (2021) Mellan två tider: brödköer, prekära liv och socialt arbete, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Jacobsson, K., Hollertz, K. and Garsten, C. (2017) Local worlds of activation: the diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities, Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2): 86–100. doi: 10.1080/2156857x.2016.1277255
Johnson, B. (2010) Kampen om sjukfrånvaron, Lund: Arkiv förlag och tidskrift.
Kemp, P. (2010) Social Protection for a Post-industrial World, Antwerp: Intersentia.
Lindsay, C. and Houston, D. (2013) Disability Benefits, Welfare Reforms and Employment Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Maynard-Moody, M. and Musheno, M. (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Services, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Mead, L. (1997) New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Murray, C. (1984) Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980, New York: Basic Books.
Nord, T. and Bengtsson, M. (2022) Reformeringen av arbetsförmedlingen. Det nya arbetsmarknadspolitiska exprimentet i marknadstänkandets tidevarv, Arbetsmarknad Och Arbetsliv, 28: 73–90.
Oliffe, J.L., Kelly, M.T., Gonzalez Montaner, G. and Yu Ko, W.F. (2021) Zoom interviews: benefits and concessions, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20: 1–8. doi: 10.1177/16094069211053522
Østergaard Møller, M. and Olofsdotter Stensöta, H. (2019) Welfare state regimes and caseworkers’ problem explanation, Administration & Society, 51(9): 1425–54.
Panican, A. and Ulmestig, R. (2016) Social rights in the shadow of poor relief: social assistance in the universal Swedish welfare state, Citizenship Studies, 20(3–4): 475–89. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1139053
Samzelius, T. (2020) A Vicious Circle of Silent Exclusion: Family Homelessness and Poverty in Sweden from a Single-Mother Perspective, PhD Dissertation, Malmö: Malmö University Press.
Samzelius, T. and Ulmestig, R. (2024) Talking about needs and rights in inter-agency meetings: interpretive contests in Swedish welfare provision, Critical and Radical Social Work, 12(4): 473–87. doi: 10.1332/20498608y2023d000000013
Skelcher, C. and Smith, S.R. (2015) Theorizing hybridity: institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: the case of nonprofits, Public Administration, 93(2): 433–48. doi: 10.1111/padm.12105
Ståhl, C. and Seing, I. (2018) Reforming activation in Swedish work disability policy, in E. MacEachen (ed) The Science and Politics of Work Disability Prevention, New York: Routledge.
Ståhl, C., Mϋssener, U. and Svensson, T. (2012) Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors, Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(16): 1404–11.
Thorén, K.H. (2008) Activation Policy in Action: A Street-level Study of Social Assistance in the Swedish Welfare State, PhD Dissertation, Växjö, Sweden: Växjö University Press.
Thornton, P.H., Jones, C. and Kury, K. (2005) Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: transformation in accounting, architecture and publishing, Research in the Sociology of Organisations, 23: 125–70. doi: 10.1016/S0733-558X(05)23004-5
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vetenskapsrådet (2017) God Forskningssed, Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Waldorff, S.B., Reay, T. and Goodrick, E. (2013) A tale of two countries: how different constellations of logics impact action, in M. Lounsbury and E. Boxenbaum (eds) Institutional Logics in Action, Part A, Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB008
Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking, Organization Science, 16(4): 409–21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 24726 | 24726 | 7509 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 196 | 3 |
PDF Downloads | 169 | 169 | 4 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here