Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy

Trust and moral motivation: redundant resources in health and social care?

Authors:
Stephen HarrisonDepartment of Applied Social Science University of Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Stephen Harrison in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Carole SmithDepartment of Applied Social Science University of Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Carole Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

English

The government's modernisation programme for health and social care has introduced institutional arrangements that are characteristic of ‘late modernity’. These support heightened surveillance of organisational performance and professional practice, increased bureaucratisation of operational arrangements, instrumental decision making about service provision and a drive to centralise consumer empowerment. Such developments are designed to (re)establish political and public confidence in professional interventions and services that are predictable, reliable and safe. A focus on confidence, however, necessarily neglects the significance of trust for service users and providers. This article argues that privileging confidence over trust fails to acknowledge the role of uncertainty, morality and discretion in the provision of care and has important consequences for service users, managers and frontline practitioners.

Stephen HarrisonDepartment of Applied Social Science University of Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Stephen Harrison in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Carole SmithDepartment of Applied Social Science University of Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Carole Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 245 229 8
Full Text Views 39 19 1
PDF Downloads 26 15 1

Altmetrics

Dimensions