Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy

Co-creation: the new kid on the block in public governance

View author details View Less
  • 1 University of California at Berkeley, , USA
  • | 2 Roskilde University, , Denmark
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article has three objectives. The first is to show that while co-production was originally tied to service production, co-creation has broader applications in the field of public governance and involves a broader range of actors and activities. The second objective is to demonstrate how the co-creation concept both builds on and extends the concept of collaborative governance, thus adding new dimensions to an already well-established literature. The final objective is to show how a strategic turn to co-creation introduces a new type of ‘generative governance’ aimed at solving complex problems by constructing platforms enabling the formation of arenas for co-creation that bring together a plethora of public and private actors, including citizens, in creative problem-solving processes. The three objectives are achieved through prospective theoretical analysis aimed at providing a conceptual foundation for analysing cutting-edge societal developments that are not yet commonplace.

  • Alford, J. (1998) A public management road less travelled: clients as co‐producers of public services, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4): 12837. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01568.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alford, J. (2010) Public value from co-production with clients, in M. Moore and J. Benington (eds) Public Value, London: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp 14457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 54371. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2017) Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1): 1632. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mux030

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansell, C. and Miura, S. (2019) Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance?, Public Administration, 98(1): 26176. doi: 10.1111/padm.12636

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (eds) (2014) Public Innovation Through Collaboration and Design, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (2017) Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance, Public Management Review, 19(1): 3757. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (2021) Public Governance as Co-Creation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Anttiroiko, A.V. (2016) City-as-a-platform, Sustainability, 8(9): 131. doi: 10.3390/su8090922

  • Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X.E. and Gómez, V. (2017) Deliberative platform design, in G. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi and T. Yasseri (eds) Social Informatics, Berlin: Springer, vol. 10540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartenberger, M. and Sześciło, D. (2016) The benefits and risks of experimental co‐production: the case of urban redesign in Vienna, Public Administration, 94(2): 50925. doi: 10.1111/padm.12233

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bason, C. (2010) Leading Public Sector Innovation, Bristol: The Policy Press.

  • Bason, C. (2014) Design for Policy, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Benington, J. (2009) Creating the public in order to create public value?, International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4): 23249. doi: 10.1080/01900690902749578

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bentzen, T.Ø., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2020) Strengthening public service production, administrative problem solving, and political leadership through co-creation of innovative public value outcomes?, The Innovation Journal, 25(4): 4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bolívar, R. and Pedro, M. (2018) Governance models and outcomes to foster public value creation in smart cities, Scienze Regionali, 17(1): 5780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borins, S. (2000) Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders?, Public Administration Review, 60(6): 498507. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00113

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond engagement and participation, Public Administration Review, 67(5): 84660. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bovaird, T. and Loeffler, E. (2012) From engagement to co-production, Voluntas, 23(4): 111938. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6

  • Bovaird, T. and Loeffler, E. (2013) We’re All in This Together, Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brabham, D.C. (2015) Crowdsourcing in the Public Sector, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Brandsen, T. and Honingh, M. (2016) Distinguishing different types of coproduction, Public Administration Review, 76(3): 42735. doi: 10.1111/puar.12465

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T. and Verschuere, B. (eds) (2018) Co-Production and Co-Creation, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Bressers, N. (2014) The impact of collaboration on innovative projects, in C. Ansell, J. Torfing (eds) Public Innovation Through Collaboration and Design, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 10723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, T. (2008) Design thinking, Harvard Business Review, 86(6): 84.

  • Brown, T. and Wyatt, J. (2010) Design thinking for social innovation, Development Outreach, 12(1): 2943. doi: 10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brudney, J. and England, R.E. (1983) Toward a definition of the co-production concept, Public Administration Review, 43(1): 5965. doi: 10.2307/975300

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryson, J. and Crosby, B. (1993) Policy planning and the design and use of forums, arenas, and courts, Environment and Planning, 20(2): 17594. doi: 10.1068/b200175

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J. and Sørensen, E. (2017) Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation, Public Management Review, 19(5): 64065. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T. and Frantzeskaki, N. (2018) Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city?, European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4): 31735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cater, D. (1964) Power in Washington, New York: Random House.

  • Cepiku, D. and Giordano, F. (2014) Co-production in developing countries, Public Management Review, 16(3): 31740. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.822535

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

  • Crosby, B., ’Hart, P. and Torfing, J. (2017) Public value creation through collaborative innovation, Public Management Review, 19(5): 65569. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Vries, H., Bekkers, V. and Tummers, L. (2016) Innovation in the public sector, Public Administration, 94(1): 14666. doi: 10.1111/padm.12209

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Della Porta, D. (2013) Can Democracy Be Saved?, New York: John Wiley.

  • Desouza, K. and Bhagwatwar, A. (2014) Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement, Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4): 2550. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2014.954898

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emerson, K. and Nabatchi, T. (2015) Collaborative Governance Regimes, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. and Balogh, S. (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1): 129. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, J. and Karvonen, A. (2011) Living laboratories for sustainability: exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition, in H. Bulkeley, V. Castan-Broto, M. Hodson and S. Marvin (eds) Cities and Low Carbon Transition, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 12641.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferlie, E. and Ongaro, E. (2015) Strategic Management in Public Services Organizations: Concepts, Schools and Contemporary Issues, Abingdon: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schütz, S. and Heinzl, A. (2014) Control versus generativity, Presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, December 14–17, Auckland, New Zealand.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Freeman, J. (1958) The bureaucracy in pressure politics, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 319(1): 1019. doi: 10.1177/000271625831900103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fung, A. (2003) Recipes for public spheres, Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3): 33867. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00181

  • Gebauer, H., Johnson, M. and Enquist, B. (2010) Value co-creation as a determinant of success in public transport services, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(6): 51130. doi: 10.1108/09604521011092866

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gloor, P. (2006) Swarm Creativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gouillart, F. and Hallett, T. (2015) Co-creation in government, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13: 407. doi: 10.1177/1532673X08330635

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graversgaard, M., Hedelin, B., Smith, L., Gertz, F., Højberg, A., Langford, J., Martinez, G., Mostert, E., et al. (2018) Opportunities and barriers for water co-governance, Sustainability, 10(5): 1634. doi: 10.3390/su10051634

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S. and Janamian, T. (2016) Achieving research impact through co‐creation in community‐based health services, The Milbank Quarterly, 94(2): 392429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, L., Russell‐Bennett, R., Plé, L. and Cáceres, R. (2010) Not always co‐creation: introducing interactional co‐destruction of value in service‐dominant logic, Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6): 43037. doi: 10.1108/08876041011072546

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heclo, H. (1978) Issue networks and the executive establishment, in A. King (ed) The New American Political System, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, pp 87124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all seasons?, Public Administration, 69(1): 319. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

  • Hopkins, M., Tidd, J. and Nightingale, P. (2014) Positive and negative dynamics of open innovation, in J. Tidd (ed) Open Innovation Research, Management and Practice, London: Imperial College Press, pp 41742.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howells, J. (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy, 35(5): 71528. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. (2013) Managing to Collaborate, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Joshi, A. and Moore, M. (2004) Institutionalized co-production, Journal of Development Studies, 40(4): 3149. doi: 10.1080/00220380410001673184

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kemp, R. and Scholl, C. (2016) City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes, Urban Planning, 1(4): 89102. doi: 10.17645/up.v1i4.749

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kenis, P. and Schneider, V. (1991) Policy networks and policy analysis, in B. Marin and R. Mayntz (eds) Policy Networks, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, pp 2559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kickert, W., Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J. (eds) (1997) Managing Complex Networks, London: Sage.

  • Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J. (2015) Governance Networks in the Public Sector, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Kooiman, J. (ed) (1993) Modern Governance, London: Sage.

  • Kornberger, M. (2017) The visible hand and the crowd, Strategic Organization, 15(2): 17493. doi: 10.1177/1476127016648499

  • Landemore, H. (2017) Democratic Reason, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Lusch, R. and Vargo, S. (2006) Service-dominant logic, Marketing Theory, 6(3): 28188. doi: 10.1177/1470593106066781

  • Lusch, R. and Vargo, S. (2011) It’s all B2B… and beyond, Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2): 18187. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.026

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mačiulienė, M. and Skaržauskienė, A. (2016) Evaluation of co-creation perspective in networked collaboration platforms, Journal of Business Research, 69(11): 482630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manzini, E. (2014) Making things happen: social innovation and design, Design Issues, 30(1): 5766. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00248

  • Margetts, H. and Naumann, A. (2017) Government as a Platform, Oxford: University of Oxford.

  • Marin, B. and Mayntz, R. (eds) (1991) Policy Networks, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

  • Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R. (1992) Policy Networks in British Government, London: Clarendon Press.

  • McGuire, M. (2006) Collaborative public management, Public Administration Review, 66(SI): 3343. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meijer, A. (2011) Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities, Public Administration Review, 71(4): 598607. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mergel, I. and Desouza, K.C. (2013) Implementing open innovation in the public sector, Public Administration Review, 73(6): 88290. doi: 10.1111/puar.12141

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, M. (1995) Creating Public Value, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Mulder, I. (2012) Living labbing the Rotterdam way, Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 3943. doi: 10.22215/timreview/607

  • Nabatchi, T. and Leighninger, M. (2015) Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy, New York: John Wiley.

  • Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A. and Sicilia, M. (2017) Varieties of participation in public services, Public Administration Review, 77(5): 76676. doi: 10.1111/puar.12765

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nambisan, S. (2009) Platforms for collaboration, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3): 449.

  • Ordanini, A. and Pasini, P. (2008) Service co-production and value co-creation, European Management Journal, 26(5): 28997. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osborne, S. and Strokosch, K. (2013) It takes two to tango?, British Journal of Management, 24(SI): S31S47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, E. (1973) On the meaning and measurement of output and efficiency in the provision of urban police services, Journal of Criminal Justice, 1(2): 93111. doi: 10.1016/0047-2352(73)90091-3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the great divide, World Development, 24(6): 107387. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X

  • Ostrom, E. and Whitaker, G. (1973) Does local community control of police make a difference?, American Journal of Political Science, 17(1): 4876. doi: 10.2307/2110474

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1971) Public choice, Public Administration Review, 31(2): 20316. doi: 10.2307/974676

  • Parks, R., Baker, P., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V. and Wilson, R. (1981) Consumers as co-producers of public services, Policy Studies Journal, 9(7): 100111. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prahalad, C. and Ramaswamy, V. (2002) The co-creation connection, Strategy and Business, 27: 5061.

  • Prahalad, C. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004) Co-creation experiences, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3): 514. doi: 10.1002/dir.20015

  • Reimer, M., McCormick, K., Nilsson, E. and Arsenault, N. (2012) Advancing sustainable urban transformation through living labs, Presented at the International Conference on Sustainability Transitions, 29–31 August 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rhodes, R. (1997) Understanding Governance, Buckingham: Open University Press.

  • Rosen, J. and Painter, G. (2019) From citizen control to co-production, Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3): 33547. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2019.1618727

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (2008) Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU, European Law Journal, 14(3): 271327. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanders, E. (2000) Generative tools for co-designing, in S. Scrivener, L. Ball and A. Woodcock (eds) Collaborative Design, London: Springer, pp 312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. (2003) Generative tools for context mapping, in D. Mconagh, P. Hekkert, J. van Erp and D. Gyi (eds) Design and Emotion, London: Taylor and Francis, pp 7781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sawhney, M. and Prandelli, E. (2000) Communities of creation, California Management Review, 42(4): 2454. doi: 10.2307/41166052

  • Sirianni, C. (2010) Investing in Democracy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

  • Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M. and Seyfang, G. (2016) Making the most of community energies, Environment and Planning A, 48(2): 40732. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15597908

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2011) Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector, Administration & Society, 43(8): 84268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2018) Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in urban spaces, Urban Affairs Review, 54(2): 388418.

  • Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2019) Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership, Public Management Review, 21(10): 144363.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (eds) (2007) Theories of Democratic Network Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

  • Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M. and Howlett, M. (2018) Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool, Policy and Society, 37(3): 27793. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Torfing, J. (2016) Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. and Røiseland, A. (2019) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation, Administration and Society, 51(5): 795825. doi: 10.1177/0095399716680057

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trischler, J., Pervan, S., Kelly, S. and Scott, D. (2018) The value of co-design, Journal of Service Research, 21(1): 75100. doi: 10.1177/1094670517714060

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vargo, S., Maglio, P. and Akaka, M. (2008) On value and value co-creation, European Management Journal, 26(3): 14552. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Von Hippel, E. (2006) Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V. and Tummers, L. (2015) A systematic review of co-creation and co-production, Public Management Review, 17(9): 133357. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, W., Bryan-Kinns, N. and Ji, T. (2016) Using community engagement to drive co-creation in rural China, International Journal of Design, 10(1): 3752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Westley, F. and Antadze, N. (2010) Making a difference: strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact, Innovation Journal, 15(2): 119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilkinson, A., Mayer, M. and Ringler, V. (2014) Collaborative futures, Journal of Futures Studies, 18(4): 126.

  • Windrum, P., Schartinger, D., Rubalcaba, L., Gallouj, F. and Toivonen, M. (2016) The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations, European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2): 15066. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2015-0033

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zittrain, J.L. (2006) The generative internet, Harvard Law Review, 119(7): 19752040.

  • 1 University of California at Berkeley, , USA
  • | 2 Roskilde University, , Denmark

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 55 55 55
PDF Downloads 43 43 43

Altmetrics

Dimensions