Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy

The democratic qualities of regulatory agencies

Author:
Libby MamanHebrew University of Jerusalem, Israeland Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI), Spain

Search for other papers by Libby Maman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

For decades, independent regulatory agencies were considered undemocratic because of their independence from political control. However, regulatory agencies are increasingly developing practices and organisational designs that reflect the sharing of power with external actors, thereby enhancing their democratic qualities. While scholars have studied these qualities, namely transparency, participation, representation and accountability, a comprehensive measure by which these qualities can be measured and compared has not yet been developed. This article fills that gap by developing indicators to measure mandatory and voluntary democratic qualities following a qualitative analysis of six regulatory agencies. It contributes to the study of regulation and public administration more broadly by advancing a research agenda that illuminates the role of bureaucracies in promoting pluralistic or majoritarian democratic values.

  • Adcock, R. and Collier, D. (2001) Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research, The American Political Science Review, 95(3): 52946. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Apaydin, F. and Jordana, J. (2020) Varying power configurations and the accountability of independent regulatory agencies, International Review of Public Policy, 2(2:3): 34257. doi: 10.4000/irpp.1458

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arras, S. and Braun, C. (2018) Stakeholders wanted! Why and how European union agencies involve Non-state stakeholders, Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9): 125775. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1307438

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1991) Tripartism: regulatory capture and empowerment, Law & Social Inquiry, 16(3): 43596.

  • Balla, S.J. and Gormley Jr, W.T. (2017) Bureaucracy and Democracy: Accountability and Performance, Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.

  • Bertelli, A.M. (2008) Credible Governance? Transparency, political control, the personal vote and British quangos, Political Studies, 56(4): 80729. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00713.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertelli, A.M. (2021) Democracy Administered: How Public Administration Shapes Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bertelli, A.M. and Busuioc, M. (2021) Reputation‐sourced authority and the prospect of unchecked bureaucratic power, Public Administration Review, 81(1): 3848. doi: 10.1111/puar.13281

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beyers, J. and Arras, S. (2020) Who feeds information to regulators? Stakeholder diversity in European Union regulatory agency consultations, Journal of Public Policy, 40(4): 57398. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X19000126

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bovens, M. (2007) Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework, European Law Journal, 13(4): 44768. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandsma, G.J. and Schillemans, T. (2013) The accountability cube: measuring accountability, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4): 95375. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus034

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, C. and Busuioc, M. (2020) Stakeholder engagement as a conduit for regulatory legitimacy?, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11): 1599611. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1817133

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carpenter, D. (2017) FDA transparency in an inescapably political world, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 45(2): 2932.

  • Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2017) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • da Cruz, N.F., Tavares, A.F., Marques, R.C., Jorge, S. and de Sousa, L. (2016) Measuring local government transparency, Public Management Review, 18(6): 86693. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeCanio, S. (2015) Democracy and the Origins of the American Regulatory State, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • DeMenno, M.B. (2019) Technocracy, democracy, and public policy: an evaluation of public participation in retrospective regulatory review, Regulation & Governance, 13(3): 37283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeVellis, R.F. (2016) Scale Development: Theory and Applications, 4th edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Dunlop, C.A., Kamkhaji, J., Radaelli, C.M., Taffoni, G. and Wagemann, C. (2020) Does consultation count for corruption? The causal relations in the EU-28, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11): 171841. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1784984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durose, C., Justice, J. and Skelcher, C. (2015) Governing at arm’s length: eroding or enhancing democracy?, Policy & Politics, 43(1): 13753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edwards, G. and Waverman, L. (2006) The effects of public ownership and regulatory independence on regulatory outcomes, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 29(1): 2367. doi: 10.1007/s11149-005-5125-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frederickson, H.G. (1991) Toward a theory of the public for public administration, Administration & Society, 22(4): 395417. doi: 10.1177/009539979102200401

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallo, N. and Lewis, D.E. (2012) The consequences of presidential patronage for federal agency performance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2): 21943. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gerring, J. (2017 Qualitative methods, Annual Review of Political Science, 20: 1536. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-092415-024158

  • Gilad, S. and Dahan, M. (2021) Representative bureaucracy and impartial policing, Public Administration, 99(1): 13755. doi: 10.1111/padm.12681

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilardi, F. (2009) Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G. and Feeney, M.K. (2017) Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments, Public Administration Review, 77(4): 57990. doi: 10.1111/puar.12689

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G., Herkes, F., Leistikow, I., Verkroost, J., de Vries, F. and Zijlstra, W.G. (2021) Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment, Regulation & Governance, 15(1): 1731.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hanretty, C. and Koop, C. (2012) Measuring the formal independence of regulatory agencies, Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2): 198216. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.607357

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hupe, P. and Edwards, A. (2012) The accountability of power: democracy and governance in modern times, European Political Science Review, 4(2): 17794. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000154

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jordana, J., Fernández-i-Marín, X. and Bianculli, A.C. (2018) Agency proliferation and the globalization of the regulatory state, Regulation & Governance, 12(4): 52440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koop, C. (2011) Explaining the accountability of independent agencies: the importance of political salience, Journal of Public Policy, 31(2): 20934. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X11000080

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koop, C. (2014) Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability, Public Administration, 92(3): 56581.

  • Koop, C. and Lodge, M. (2020) British economic regulators in an age of politicization: from the responsible to the responsive regulatory state?, Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11): 161235. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1817127

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levi‐Faur, D. (2011) The regulatory state and regulatory capitalism: an institutional perspective, in J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (eds) Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 66272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lijphart, A. (2007) Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Lodge, M. (2004) Accountability and transparency in regulation: critiques, doctrines and instruments, in J. Jordana and D. Levi-Faur (eds) The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 12444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maggetti, M. (2010) Legitimacy and accountability of independent regulatory agencies: a critical review, Living Reviews in Democracy, 2: 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maggetti, M., Ingold, K. and Varone, F. (2013) Having your cake and eating it, too: can regulatory agencies be both independent and accountable?, Swiss Political Science Review, 19(1): 1-25.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Majone, G. (1999) The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems, West European Politics, 22(1): 124. doi: 10.1080/01402389908425284

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meijer, A.J., Curtin, D. and Hillebrandt, M. (2012) Open government: connecting vision and voice, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1): 1029. doi: 10.1177/0020852311429533

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, K.J. and McTavish, D. (2014) Representative bureaucracy: a typology of normative institutional strategies for the representation of women, Policy & Politics, 42(4): 53146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mulgan, R. (2000) ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept?, Public Administration, 78(3): 55573. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00218

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nabatchi, T. (2012) Putting the ‘public’ back in public values research: designing participation to identify and respond to values, Public Administration Review, 72(5): 699708. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neshkova, M.I. (2014) Does agency autonomy foster public participation?, Public Administration Review, 74(1): 6474. doi: 10.1111/puar.12180

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Overman, S., Schillemans, T. and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2020) A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector: gauging the account holder’s legitimacy and expertise, Public Management Review, 23(12): 120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Papadopoulos, Y. and Warin, P. (2007) Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in Policy-making democratic and effective?, European Journal of Political Research, 46(4): 44572. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00696.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez Durán, I. (2018) Interest group representation in the formal design of European union agencies, Regulation & Governance, 12(2): 23862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez-Durán, I. and Bravo-Laguna, C. (2019) Representative bureaucracy in European Union agencies, Journal of European Integration, 41(8): 97192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Potter, R.A. (2019) Bending the Rules: Procedural Politicking in the Bureaucracy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Puppis, M., Maggetti, M., Gilardi, F., Biela, J. and Papadopoulos, Y. (2014) The political communication of independent regulatory agencies, Swiss Political Science Review, 20(3): 388412. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12118

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, V. and Wood, M. (2019) Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance, Public Administration, 97(4): 72740. doi: 10.1111/padm.12615

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, C. (2000) Accountability in the regulatory state, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1): 3860. doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00146

  • Scott, C. (2015) Regulatory capitalism, accountability and democracy, in A.C. Bianculli, X. Fernández-i-Marín and J. Jordana (eds) Accountability and Regulatory Governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 189208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steffek, J. (2019) The limits of proceduralism: critical remarks on the rise of ‘throughput legitimacy’, Public Administration, 97(4): 78496. doi: 10.1111/padm.12565

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thatcher, M. (2002) Regulation after delegation: independent regulatory agencies in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6): 95472. doi: 10.1080/1350176022000046445

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thatcher, M. and Stone Sweet, A. (2002) Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions, West European Politics, 25(1): 122. doi: 10.1080/713601583

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Veen, A. (2014) Regulation without Representation? Independent Regulatory Authorities and Representative Claim-Making in the Netherlands, Utrecht: Utrecht University Repository.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verhoest, K. (2018) Agencification in Europe, in E. Ongaro and S. Van Thiel (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 32746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vibert, F. (2007) The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wood, B.D. and Waterman, R.W. (1991) The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy, The American Political Science Review, 85(3): 80128. doi: 10.2307/1963851

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woods, N.D. (2009) Promoting participation? An examination of rulemaking notification and access procedures, Public Administration Review, 69(3): 51830. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01997.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Libby MamanHebrew University of Jerusalem, Israeland Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI), Spain

Search for other papers by Libby Maman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 325 325 159
Full Text Views 1084 1084 87
PDF Downloads 944 944 86

Altmetrics

Dimensions