Welfare solidarity in multi-ethnic societies: can social investment reduce the anti-immigrant bias?
Search for other papers by Giuliano Bonoli in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Juliana Chueri in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Mia K. Gandenberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
Migration flows have diversified western societies, challenging the political viability of inclusive welfare states. This is very clear in research on perceptions of deservingness to social benefits, which consistently shows that immigrants are considered as less deserving of collective help than natives. At the same time, welfare states are being reoriented towards social investment, putting more emphasis on services that strengthen human capital and improve access to employment rather than on redistribution. In this article we ask whether the shift towards a social investment welfare state is likely to reduce the immigrant deservingness penalty. Theoretically, we rely on two perspectives: social trust and identity theory. Following the literature on social trust, we expect the reorientation of welfare states towards social investment to reduce the negative impact of diversity on solidarity, as those interventions are to an extent immune to free-riding. Alternatively, according to social identity theory, we expect a similar in-group bias independent of the intervention. We rely on vignette experiments conducted in 2021 in Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the US to compare the immigrant deservingness penalty between social compensation and social investment interventions. Results show no difference between the immigrant deservingness penalty across the social intervention types, suggesting exclusionary attitudes are driven by in-group favouritism.
-
Aarøe, L. and Petersen, M.B. (2014) Crowding out culture: Scandinavians and Americans agree on social welfare in the face of deservingness cues, The Journal of Politics, 76(3): 684–97. doi: 10.1017/s002238161400019x
-
Achen, C. and Bartels, L. (2017) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do Not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Alesina, A. and Glaser, M. (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2002) Who trusts others?, Journal of Public Economics, 85(2): 207–34. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00084-6
-
Allport, G.W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
-
Auspurg, K. and Hinz, T. (2015) Factorial Survey Experiments, Vol 175, London: Sage.
-
Banting, K. (2017) Migration, diversity, and the welfare state, in F.D. Bean and S.K. Brown (eds) Encyclopedia of Migration, Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands.
-
Banting, K., Harell, A. and Kymlicka, W. (2022) Nationalism, membership and the politics of minority claims-making, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 55(3): 537–60. doi: 10.1017/s0008423922000403
-
Becker, G. (1957) The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
-
Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N. and Hume, D.L. (2001) Status differences and in-group bias: a meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability, Psychological Bulletin, 127(4): 520. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
-
Bonoli, G. (2020) Immigrant integration and social investment, Journal of European Social Policy, 30(5): 616–27. doi: 10.1177/0958928720950619
-
Bonoli, G., Chueri, J. and Gandenberger, M. (2023) Welfare Solidarity in Multi-Ethnic Societies: Can Social Investment Reduce the Anti-Immigrant Bias?, Lausanne: University of Lausanne, pre-print, https://serval.unil.ch/fr/notice/serval:BIB_171D0EFB15D8.
-
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (2000) Reciprocity, self-interest, and the welfare state, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26(1): 33–53.
-
Brewer, M.B. (1991) The social self: on being the same and different at the same time, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5): 475–82. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001
-
Brewer, M.B. (1999) The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate?, Journal of Social Issues, 55(3): 429–44. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00126
-
Brewer, M.B. (2007) The importance of being we: human nature and intergroup relations, American Psychologist, 62(8): 728–38. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.62.8.728
-
Burgoon, B. (2014) Immigration, integration, and support for redistribution in Europe, World Politics, 66(3): 365–405. doi: 10.1017/s0043887114000100
-
Butz, A.M. and Kehrberg, J.E. (2015) Social distrust and immigrant access to welfare programs in the American states, Politics & Policy, 43(2): 256–86. doi: 10.1111/polp.12115
-
Cadsby, C.B., Du, N. and Song, F. (2016) In-group favoritism and moral decision-making, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128: 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.008
-
Chueri, J. (2022) An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right‐wing parties are reshaping the welfare state, Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4): 383–409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12230
-
Crepaz, M.M. (2008) Trust Beyond Borders: Immigration, The Welfare State, and Identity in Modern Societies, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
-
Crepaz, M.M.L. and Damron, R. (2009) Constructing tolerance: how the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants, Comparative Political Studies, 42(3): 437–63. doi: 10.1177/0010414008325576
-
Dinesen, P.T., Schaeffer, M. and Sønderskov, K.M. (2020) Ethnic diversity and social trust: a narrative and meta-analytical review, Annual Review of Political Science, 23: 441–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052918-020708
-
Ebner, C. and Helbling, M. (2015) Social distance and wage inequalities for immigrants in Switzerland, Work, Employment and Society, 30(3): 436–54. doi: 10.1177/0950017015594096
-
Eick, G.M. and Larsen, C.A. (2022) Welfare chauvinism across benefits and services, Journal of European Social Policy, 32(1): 19–32. doi: 10.1177/09589287211023047
-
Enggist, M. and Pinggera, M. (2022) Radical right parties and their welfare state stances–not so blurry after all?, West European Politics, 45(1): 102–28. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115
-
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Gandenberger, M.K., Knotz, C.M., Fossati, F. and Bonoli, G. (2022) Conditional solidarity – attitudes towards support for others during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic, Journal of Social Policy, 52(4): 943–61. doi: 10.1017/s0047279421001070
-
Garritzmann, J.L., Busemeyer, M.R. and Neimanns, E. (2018) Public demand for social investment: new supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe?, Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6): 844–61. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401107
-
Garritzmann, J.L., Häusermann, S. and Palier, B. (Eds) (2022) The World Politics of Social Investment: Volume II. The Politics of Varying Social Investment Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gilens, M. (1999) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Guryan, J. and Charles, K. (2013) Taste‐based or statistical discrimination: the economics of discrimination returns to its roots, The Economic Journal, 123(572): F417–32.
-
Hagendoorn, L. (1993) Ethnic categorization and outgroup exclusion: cultural values and social stereotypes in the construction of ethnic hierarchies, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(1): 27–51. doi: 10.1080/01419870.1993.9993771
-
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D. and Yamamoto, T. (2015) Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8): 2395–400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112
-
Hedegaard, T.F. and Larsen, C.A. (2022) Who can become a full member of the club? - Results from a conjoint survey experiment on public attitudes about the naturalisation of non-EU migrants in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark, Scandinavian Political Studies, 45(4): 433–55. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12232
-
Hemerijck, A. (2017) Social investment and its critics, in A. Hemerijck (ed) The Uses of Social Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 3–42.
-
Hertel, G. and Kerr, N.L. (2001) Priming in-group favoritism: the impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(4): 316–24. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1447
-
Heuer, J.O. and Zimmermann, K. (2020) Unravelling deservingness: which criteria do people use to judge the relative deservingness of welfare target groups?, Journal of European Social Policy, 30(4): 389–403. doi: 10.1177/0958928720905285
-
Huddy, L., Mason, L. and Aarøe, L. (2015) Expressive partisanship: campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity, American Political Science Review, 109(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1017/s0003055414000604
-
Jensen, C. and Petersen, M.B. (2017) The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care, American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 68–83. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12251
-
Jenson, J. and Saint-Martin, D. (2006) Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGOTM paradigm of an active society, Policy and Politics, 34(3): 429–51. doi: 10.1332/030557306777695325
-
Jetten, J., Spears, R. and Manstead, A.S.R. (1996) Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6): 1222–33. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1222
-
Kenworthy, L. (2022) Would Democratic Socialism be Better?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Knotz, C.M., Gandenberger, M.K., Fossati, F. and Bonoli, G. (2022) A recast framework for welfare deservingness perceptions, Social Indicators Research, 159: 927–43. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02774-9
-
Kootstra, A. (2016) Deserving and undeserving welfare claimants in Britain and the Netherlands: examining the role of ethnicity and migration status using a vignette experiment, European Sociological Review, 32(3): 325–39. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcw010
-
Kumlin, S., Wolleboek, D., Fladmoe, A. and Steen-Johnsen, K. (2017) Leap of faith or judgment of deservingness? Generalized trust, trust in immigrants and support for the welfare state, in W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman and T. Reeskens (eds) The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare. Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 281–98.
-
Larsen, C.A. (2008) The institutional logic of welfare attitudes – how welfare regimes influence public support, Comparative Political Studies, 41(2): 145–68. doi: 10.1177/0010414006295234
-
Larsen, C.A. (2020) The institutional logic of giving migrants access to social benefits and services, Journal of European Social Policy, 30(1): 48–62. doi: 10.1177/0958928719868443
-
Lee, Y.T. and Ottati, V. (2002) Attitudes toward US immigration policy: the roles of in-group–out-group bias, economic concern, and obedience to law, The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(5): 617–34. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603922
-
Maltby, E. and Kreitzer, R.J. (2023) How racialized policy contact shapes the social constructions of policy targets, Policy Studies Journal, 51(1): 145–62. doi: 10.1111/psj.12481
-
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (Eds) (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.
-
Mullen, B., Brown, R. and Smith, C. (1992) Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: an integration, European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2): 103–22. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
-
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P. and Piquero, A. (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients, Criminology, 36(4): 859–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
-
Petersen, M.B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S. and Ramsøy, T. (2013) Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues, Political Behavior, 35: 831–54. doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9213-1
-
Petersen, M.B., Slothuus, R., Stubager, R. and Togeby, L. (2011) Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: the automaticity of the deservingness heuristic, European Journal of Political Research, 50(1): 24–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01923.x
-
Petersen, M.B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (2012) Who Deserves Help? evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about Welfare, Political Psychology, 33(3): 395–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00883.x
-
Platow, M.J., Harley, K., Hunter, J.A., Hanning, P., Shave, R. and O’Connell, A. (1997) Interpreting in‐group‐favouring allocations in the minimal group paradigm, British Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1): 107–17. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01121.x
-
Putnam, R. (2007) E pluribus unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century – the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30: 137–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
-
Reeskens, T. and van der Meer, T. (2019) The inevitable deservingness gap: a study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness, Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2): 166–81. doi: 10.1177/0958928718768335
-
Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R. and Sherif, C.W. (1961) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment, Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
-
Soroka, S.N., Johnston, R., Kevins, A., Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (2016) Migration and welfare state spending, European Political Science Review, 8(2): 173–194. doi: 10.1017/s1755773915000041
-
Soss, J.O.E. and Schram, S.F. (2007) A public transformed? Welfare reform as policy feedback, American Political Science Review, 101(1): 111–27. doi: 10.1017/s0003055407070049
-
Svallfors, S. (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations, European Sociological Review, 13(3): 283–304. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219
-
Svallfors, S. (2003) Welfare regimes and welfare opinions: a comparison of eight western countries, Social Indicators Research, 64(3): 495–520. doi: 10.1023/A:1025931414917
-
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, in W.G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Oxford University Press, pp 33–47.
-
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior, in S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall, pp 7–24.
-
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1995) Who wants the welfare state? Support for state welfare provision in European countries, in S. Svallfors (ed) In the Eye of the Beholder. Opinions on Welfare and Justice in Comparative Perspective, Boras: The Bank of Sweden Trecentenary Foundation, pp 11–51.
-
Turner, J.C., Brown, R.J. and Tajfel, H. (1979) Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism, European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2): 187–204. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
-
Uslaner, E.M. (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
-
van der Aa, M., Hiligsmann, M., Aggie, P. and Evers, S. (2017) Healthcare deservingness opinions of the general public and policymakers compared: a discrete choice experiment, in W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman and T. Reeskens (eds) The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare. Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 241–62.
-
van Oorschot, W. (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public, Policy and Politics, 28(1): 33–48. doi: 10.1332/0305573002500811
-
van Oorschot, W. (2006) Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states, Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1): 23–42. doi: 10.1177/0958928706059829
-
van Oorschot, W. and Arts, W. (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: the crowding out hypothesis revisited, Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1): 5–26. doi: 10.1177/0958928705049159
-
van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B. and Reeskens, T. (eds) (2017) The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Supplementary Materials
- Supplementary_AppendixS1.docx (DOC 1989 KB)
Search for other papers by Giuliano Bonoli in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Juliana Chueri in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Mia K. Gandenberger in
Current site
Google Scholar
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1801 | 1801 | 88 |
| Full Text Views | 135 | 135 | 3 |
| PDF Downloads | 187 | 187 | 6 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk