Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy

New pathways to paradigm change in public policy: combining insights from policy design, mix and feedback

View author details View Less
  • 1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, , Switzerland
  • | 2 National University of Singapore, , Singapore
  • | 3 Simon Fraser University, , Canada
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

To tackle the manifold crises of our times, most notably the environmental crises we face, ambitious policy change is urgently needed to achieve the necessary radical transformation of our industrialised societies. Yet, while there is increasing demand for public policy scholarship to provide guidance on how policy should be designed to achieve such change, existing scholarship struggles to provide ‘forward-looking’ recommendations. Within this context, our article takes a step back to reconsider the underlying logics of policy change. We argue that focusing on policy, its effect and the subsequent politics it triggers is best achieved by combining insights from the policy design, policy mix and policy feedback literatures. This combination allows us to re-evaluate which potential pathways towards policy change exist.

The main contribution of our article is its proposition of two distinct pathways towards policy change, building on a systematic understanding of policy design elements. These pathways place greater emphasis on policy change happening (1) ‘bottom-up’ through initial low-level design changes rather than ‘top-down’ through high-level ideational change, as argued in earlier scholarship, (2) through the interplay of several policies in a complex mix. In this way, these pathways provide a useful framework for systematically analysing how policy should be designed to achieve ambitious policy change and thus enable transformative societal change.

  • Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Béland, D. (2007) Ideas and institutional change in social security: conversion, layering, and policy drift, Social Science Quarterly, 88(1): 2038.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Béland, D. and Cox, R.H. (2011) Ideas and politics in social science research, ideas and politics in social science research, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736430.001.0001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Béland, D. and Schlager, E. (2019) Varieties of policy feedback research: looking backward, moving forward, Policy Studies Journal, 47(2): 184205, doi: 10.1111/psj.12340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Béland, D., Howlett, M., Rocco, P. and Waddan, A. (2020) Designing policy resilience: lessons from the affordable care act, Policy Sciences, doi: 10.1007/s11077-019-09368-w.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burns, C., Tobin, P. and Sewerin, S. (2019) Measuring the impact of the crisis on European environmental policy, in C. Burns, P. Tobin and S. Sewerin (eds) The Impact of the Economic Crisis on European Environmental Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 118, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198826958.003.0001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cairney, P. and Weible, C.M. (2015) Comparing and contrasting Peter Hall’s paradigms and ideas with the advocacy coalition framework, in J. Hogan and M. Howlett (eds) Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice, doi: 10.1057/9781137434043_5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capano, G. and Howlett, M. (2020) The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: policy tools and the current research Agenda on policy mixes, SAGE Open, doi: 10.1177/2158244019900568.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capano, G. and Howlett, M. (2021) Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: how and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design, Public Policy and Administration, 36(2): 14162, doi: 10.1177/0952076719827068.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cashore, B. and Howlett, M. (2007) Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in pacific northwest forestry, American Journal of Political Science, 51(3): 53251, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daugbjerg, C. and Kay, A. (2019) Policy feedback and pathways: when change leads to endurance and continuity to change, Policy Sciences, 53: 25368, doi: 10.1007/s11077-019-09366-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daugbjerg, C. and Swinbank, A. (2015) Three decades of policy layering and politically sustainable reform in the European union’s agricultural policy, Governance, 29(2): 26580. doi: 10.1111/gove.12171

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Derwort, P., Jager, N. and Newig, J. (2021) How to explain major policy change towards sustainability? Bringing together the multiple streams framework and the multilevel perspective on socio-technical transitions to explore the German ‘Energiewende’, Policy Studies Journal, doi: 10.1111/psj.12428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hurka, S., Knill, C., and Steinebach, Y. (2019) Systemic dynamics of policy change: overcoming some blind spots of punctuated equilibrium theory, Policy Studies Journal, doi: 10.1111/psj.12379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fernández-i-Marín, X., Knill, C. and Steinebach, Y. (2021) Studying policy design quality in comparative perspective, American Political Science Review, doi: 10.1017/S0003055421000186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grin, J., Rotmans, J. and Schot, J. (2010) Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, New York: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780203856598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haelg, L., Sewerin, S. and Schmidt, T.S. (2020) The role of actors in the policy design process: introducing design coalitions to explain policy output, Policy Sciences, 53: 30947, doi: 10.1007/s11077-019-09365-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, P.A. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275, doi: 10.2307/422246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howlett, M. and Cashore, B. (2009) The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: understanding policy change as a methodological problem, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1): 3346, doi: 10.1080/13876980802648144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howlett, M. and del Rio, P. (2015) The parameters of policy portfolios: verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5): 123345, doi: 10.1177/0263774X15610059.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howlett, M. and Rayner, J. (2013) Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design, Politics and Governance, 1(2): 17082, doi: 10.12924/pag2013.01020170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I. and Rayner, J. (2018) Understanding policy designs over time: layering, stretching, patching and packaging, in M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee (eds) Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 13644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2021) Global EV Outlook 2021 – Accelerating Ambitions Despite the Pandemic, Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2022) Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva: World Meteorological Organization/UN Environment.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobs, A.M. and Weaver, R.K. (2015) When policies undo themselves: self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change, Governance, 28(4): 44157, doi: 10.1111/gove.12101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jordan, A. and Matt, E. (2014) Designing policies that intentionally stick: policy feedback in a changing climate, Policy Sciences, 47(3): 22747, doi: 10.1007/s11077-014-9201-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jordan, A.J. and Moore, B. (2020) Durable by Design? Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Judge-Lord, D., McDermott, C.L. and Cashore, B. (2020) Do private regulations ratchet up? How to distinguish types of regulatory stringency and patterns of change, Organization and Environment, 33(1), doi: 10.1177/1086026619858874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kamkhaji, J.C. and Radaelli, C.M. (2021) Don’t think it’s a good idea! Four building sites of the ‘ideas school’, West European Politics, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1959751.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kingdon, J.W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, MA: Little Brown, doi: 10.3886/ICPSR28024.v1.

  • Knill, C., Schulze, K. and Tosun, J. (2012) Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: exploring a complex relationship, Regulation and Governance, 6(4): 42744, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lascoumes, P. and Le Gales, P. (2007) Introduction : understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation, Governance, 20(1): 121, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lauber, V. and Jacobsson, S. (2016) The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables – the German Renewable Energy Act, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18: 14763, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leiren, M.D. and Reimer, I. (2018) Historical institutionalist perspective on the shift from feed-in tariffs towards auctioning in German renewable energy policy, Energy Research and Social Science, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lesnikowski, A., Ford, J. D., Biesbroek, R., and Berrang-Ford, L. (2019) A policy mixes approach to conceptualizing and measuring climate change adaptation policy, Climatic Change, 156: 44769, doi: 10.1007/s10584-019-02533-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., and Auld, G. (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change, Policy Sciences, 45: 12352, doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2009) A theory of gradual institutional change, in J. Mahoney and K. Thelen (eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 137, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806414.003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Markard, J., Raven, R. and Truffer, B. (2012) Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy, 41(6): 95567, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2012.02.013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meckling, J. and Nahm, J. (2019) The politics of technology bans: industrial policy competition and green goals for the auto industry, Energy Policy, 126: 47079, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.031.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nohrstedt, D. (2005) External shocks and policy change: Three Mile Island and Swedish nuclear energy policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6): 104159, doi: 10.1080/13501760500270729.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Sullivan, M., Edler, D. and Lehr, U. (2019) Ökonomische Indikatoren der Energiebereitstellung: Methode, Abgrenzung und Ergebnisse für den Zeitraum 2000–2017, Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oliver, M.J. and Pemberton, H. (2004) Learning and change in 20th-century British economic policy, Governance, 17(3): 41541, doi: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00252.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peters, B.G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M. H., and Ravinet, P. (2018) Designing for Policy Effectiveness: Defining and Understanding a Concept, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/9781108555081.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierson, P. (1993) When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change reviewed work(s): the three worlds of welfare capitalism by Gosta Esping-Andersen; the political power of economic ideas: keynesianism across countries by Peter Hall, World Politics, 45(4): 595628, doi: 10.2307/2950710.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierson, P. (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics, American Political Science Review, 94(2): 25167, doi: 10.2307/2586011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Purdon, M., Witcover, J., Murphy, C., Ziaja, S., Winfield, M., Giuliano, G., Séguin, C., Kaiser, C., Papy, J., and Fulton, L. (2021) Climate and transportation policy sequencing in California and Quebec, Review of Policy Research, 38(5): doi: 10.1111/ropr.12440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Renn, O. and Marshall, J.P. (2016) Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: from the 1950s to the Energiewende, Energy Policy, 99: 22432, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J. and Cashore, B. (2019) Stability and climate policy? Harnessing insights on path dependence, policy feedback, and transition pathways, Energy Research and Social Science, 50(December 2018): 16878, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S. and Seubert, S. (2015) Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output, Policy Studies Journal, 43(2): 25782, doi: 10.1111/psj.12095.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmid, N., Sewerin, S. and Schmidt, T.S. (2020a) Explaining avocacy coalition change with policy feedback, Policy Studies Journal, 48(4): 110934, doi: 10.1111/psj.12365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmid, N., Schmidt, T.S. and Sewerin, S. (2020b) Technological change, agency and the politics of policy redesigning: the case of the German feed-in tariff, 2000-2018. Paper presented at the 11th International Sustainability Transitions Conference.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, T.S. and Sewerin, S. (2017) Technology as a driver of climate and energy politics, Nature Energy, 2(6): 17084, doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.84.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, T.S. and Sewerin, S. (2019) Measuring the temporal dynamics of policy mixes – an empirical analysis of renewable energy policy mixes’ balance and design features in nine countries, Research Policy, 48(10): 103557, doi: 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2018.03.012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, T.S., Sewerin, S. and Bateson, B. (2018) Does policy design predict a policy mix’s future? A new empirical approach to analysing path-dependency, Paper presented to the IWPP Workshop on ‘Policy feedback and policy dynamics: Methodological and theoretical challenges, Pittsburgh, June 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, T.S., Schmid, N. and Sewerin, S. (2019) Policy goals, partisanship and paradigmatic change in energy policy – analyzing parliamentary discourse in Germany over 30 years, Climate Policy, 19(6): 77186, doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1594667.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Routledge.

  • Sewerin, S. (2020) Understanding complex policy mixes: conceptual and empirical challenges, in G. Capano and M. Howlett (eds) A Modern Guide to Public Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 191201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sewerin, S., Béland, D. and Cashore, B. (2020) Designing policy for the long term: agency, policy feedback and policy change, Policy Sciences, doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09391-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Skogstad, G. (2017) Policy feedback and self-reinforcing and self-undermining processes in EU biofuels policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1): 2141, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1132752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... and Sörlin, S. (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347(6223), doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steinebach, Y. (2019) Instrument choice, implementation structures, and the effectiveness of environmental policies: a cross-national analysis, Regulation & Governance, 16(1): 22542, doi: 10.1111/REGO.12297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sterner, T., Barbier, E.B., Bateman, I. et al. (2019) Policy design for the Anthropocene, Nature Sustainability, 2(1): 1421, doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0194-x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005) Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thiery, W. et al. (2021) Intergenerational inequities in exposure to climate extremes, Science, doi: 10.1126/science.abi7339.

  • Tosun, J. and Schnepf, J. (2020) Measuring change in comparative policy analysis: concepts and empirical approaches, in B. Guy Peters and G. Fontaine (eds) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 16785, doi: 10.4337/9781788111195.00017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van der Heijden, J. and Kuhlmann, J. (2017) Studying incremental institutional change: a systematic and critical meta-review of the literature from 2005 to 2015, Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), doi: 10.1111/psj.12191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wee, S., Coffman, M. and La Croix, S. (2019) Data on US state-level electric vehicle policies, 2010–2015, Data in Brief, 23, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.01.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C.M., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., and Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (2020) Sharpening advocacy coalitions, Policy Studies Journal, 48(4), doi: 10.1111/psj.12360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C., Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (2011) A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: an introduction to the special issue, Policy Studies Journal, 39(3): 34960, doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weible, C., Sabatier, P. and McQueen, K. (2009) Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Studies Journal, 37(1): 12140, doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N. and Rüb, F. (2015) Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework: an introduction, European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), doi: 10.1111/1475–6765.12102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, , Switzerland
  • | 2 National University of Singapore, , Singapore
  • | 3 Simon Fraser University, , Canada

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 375 375 375
Full Text Views 15 15 15
PDF Downloads 29 29 29

Altmetrics

Dimensions