Despite a robust literature applying the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) to national government institutions, there remains a dearth of research examining the theory’s explanatory power in US state legislative contexts. This omission is problematic given the critical role state legislatures play in driving policy change in a host of policy domains, including healthcare, emergency preparedness and voting rights policy, to name a few. To fill this gap in the research, this study applies the MSF to the case of climate adaptation policy making in the Massachusetts State Legislature. Using a mixed methods design, it assesses the effect of all three of the MSF’s streams (the problem, politics and policy streams), as well as the concept of policy entrepreneurship on the climate adaptation policy agenda of the Massachusetts State Legislature between the years 2001 and 2020. The findings suggest that agenda activity was largely driven by changes within the political stream, namely the election of a Republican governor. In addition to advancing the MSF by providing one of the most comprehensive quantitative analyses of the framework to date, this article draws on new data from the State House News Service and other sources of state legislative floor debates to present a new methodological approach for measuring agenda change. In this way, the article makes a clear theoretical contribution to the MSF literature as well as providing new analysis of state-level climate adaptation policy adoption.
Anderson, S.E., DeLeo, R. and Taylor, K. (2020) Policy entrepreneurs, legislators, and agenda setting: information and influence, Policy Studies Journal, 48(3): 587–611. doi: 10.1111/psj.12331
Anderson, S.E., DeLeo, R. and Taylor, K. (2023) Legislators do not harness voter support for disaster preparedness, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 14(1): 68–88. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12261
Arnold, G. (2021) Does entrepreneurship work? Understanding what policy entrepreneurs do and whether it matters, Policy Studies Journal, 49(4): 968–91. doi: 10.1111/psj.12388
Birkland, T.A. (1997) After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Brown, C.P. (2007) Examining the streams of a retention policy to understand the politics of a high-stakes reform, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8: art 9. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v15n9.2007
Callaghan, T. and Sylvester, S. (2021) Private citizens as policy entrepreneurs: evidence from autism mandates and parental political mobilization, Policy Studies Journal, 49(1): 123–45. doi: 10.1111/psj.12346
Clarke, J. (2022) Climate adaptation management plan, Internal document, Massachusetts Climate Change Adaptation Coalition.
Cook, J. and Rinfret, S. (2013) The environmental protection agency regulates greenhouse gas emissions: is anyone paying attention?, Review of Policy Research, 30(3): 263–80. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12017
Craig, R.L., Felix, H.C., Walker, J.F. and Phillips, M.M. (2010) Public health professionals as policy entrepreneurs: Arkansas’s childhood obesity policy experience, American Journal of Public Health, 100(11): 2047–52. doi: 10.2105/FAJPH.2009.183939
Culp, R.F. (2005) The rise and stall of prison privatization: an integration of policy analysis perspectives, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(4): 412–42. doi: 10.1177/0887403405275837
DeLeo, R.A. (2018) Indicators, agendas and streams: analysing the politics of preparedness, Policy & Politics, 46(1): 27–45. doi: 10.1332/030557317X14974484611316
DeLeo, R.A. and Duarte, A. (2022) Does data drive policymaking? A multiple streams perspective on the relationship between indicators and agenda setting, Policy Studies Journal, 50(3): 701–24. doi: 10.1111/psj.12419
DeLeo, R.A., Zohlnhöfer, R. and Zahariadis, N. (2024) Multiple Streams and Policy Ambiguity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delshad, A.B. (2012) Revisiting ‘who influences whom?’ Agenda setting on biofuels, Congress & the Presidency, 39(2): 177–98. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2012.674082
Detterman, B.J. (2016) Massachusetts Governor Baker signs Executive Order 569 on climate change, National Law Review, 24 October, https://natlawreview.com/article/massachusetts-governor-baker-signs-executive-order-569-climate-change.
Dolan, D.A. (2021) Multiple partial couplings in the Multiple Streams Framework: the case of extreme weather and climate change adaptation, Policy Studies Journal, 49(1): 164–89. doi: 10.1111/psj.12341
Engler, F. and Herweg, N. (2019) Of barriers to entry for medium and large n multiple streams applications: methodological and conceptual considerations, Policy Studies Journal, 47(4): 905–26. doi: 10.1111/psj.12235
Fowler, L. (2022) Using the Multiple Streams Framework to connect policy adoption to implementation, Policy Studies Journal, 50(3): 615–39. doi: 10.1111/psj.12381
Gamm, G. and Kousser, T. (2010) Broad bills or particularistic policy? Historical patterns in American state legislatures, American Political Science Review, 104(1): 151–70. doi: 10.1017/s000305540999030x
Gibbons, E.T. (2016) Governor Baker signs executive order directing administration to act on climate [blog], Green Energy Consumers Alliance, 19 September, https://blog.greenenergyconsumers.org/blog/governor-baker-signs-executive-order-directing-administration-to-act-on-climate.
Goyal, N. (2022) Policy diffusion through multiple streams: the (non-)adoption of energy conservation building code in India, Policy Studies Journal, 51(3): 641–69. doi: 10.1111/psj.12415
Greathouse, L.W., Hahn, E.J., Okoli, C.T.C., Warnick, T.A. and Riker, C.A. (2005) Passing a smoke-free law in a pro-tobacco culture: a multiple streams approach, Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 6(3): 211–20. doi: 10.1177/1527154405278775
Henstra, D. (2010) Explaining local policy choices: a multiple streams analysis of municipal emergency management, Canadian Public Administration, 53(2): 241–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00128.x
Herweg, N. (2016) Clarifying the concept of policy-communities in the Multiple-Streams Framework, in R. Zohlnhöfer and F.W. Rüb (eds), Decision-Making under Ambiguity and Time Constraints: Assessing the Multiple-Streams Framework, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp 125–45.
Herweg, N., Huß, C. and Zohlnhöfer, R. (2015) Straightening the three streams: theorizing extensions of the Multiple Streams Framework, European Journal of Political Research, 54(3): 435–49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12089
Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N. and Zohlnhöfer, R. (2022) Travelling far and wide? Applying the Multiple Streams Framework to policy-making in autocracies, German Political Science Quarterly, 63(2): 203–23. doi: 10.1007/s11615-022-00393-8
Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N. and Zohlnhöfer, R. (2023) The Multiple Streams Framework: foundations, refinements, and empirical applications, in C.M. Weible (ed) Theories of the Policy Process, 5th edn, New York: Routledge, pp 29–64.
Hewett, A. (2016) Massachusetts must continue to lead toward a clean energy future [NWF blog], National Wildlife Federation, 23 November, https://blog.nwf.org/2014/11/massachusetts-will-continue-to-lead-toward-a-clean-energy-future/.
Jones, M.D., Peterson, H.L., Pierce, J.J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Raney, H.L. et al (2016) A river runs through it: a multiple streams meta-review, Policy Studies Journal, 44(1): 13–36. doi: 10.1111/psj.12115
Kingdon, J.W. (2011) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn, Boston, MA: Longman.
Knaggård, Å. (2015) The Multiple Streams Framework and the problem broker, European Journal of Political Research, 54(3): 450–65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12097
Koebele, E. (2021) When multiple streams make a river: analyzing collaborative policymaking institutions using the Multiple Streams Framework, Policy Sciences, 54(3): 609–28. doi: 10.1007/s11077-021-09425-3
Lannan, K. (2018) Gov. Baker plans to file climate change bill next week, WBUR, 8 March, https://www.wbur.org/news/2018/03/08/baker-climate-change-legislation.
Mintrom, M. (2000) Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Münter, M. (2005) Verfassungsreform im Einheitsstaat: Die Politik der Dezentralisierung in Großbritannien, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Murphy, M. (2019) Warning of flooded cities, Spilka puts climate change atop to-do list, Boston Globe, 9 January.
NECN (2018) Call for action on our battered coast [video], NECN, 6 March, https://www.necn.com/on-air/as-seen-on/call-for-action-on-our-battered-coast_necn/237199/.
O’Donovan, K. (2017) An assessment of aggregate focusing events, disaster experience, and policy change, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(3): 201–19. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12116
Rios, S. (2018) Gov. Baker announces climate resiliency bond bill, WBUR, 15 March, https://www.wbur.org/news/2018/03/15/baker-climate-plan.
Rozbicka, P. and Spohr, F. (2016) Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework, Policy Sciences, 49(1): 55–69. doi: 10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8
Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E.A., Criado, J.I. and Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2020) Analyzing open government policy adoption through the Multiple Streams Framework: the roles of policy entrepreneurs in the case of Madrid, Public Policy and Administration, 38(2): 233–64. doi: 10.1177/0952076720936349
Saurugger, S. and Terpan, F. (2016) Do crises lead to policy change? The Multiple Streams Framework and the European Union’s economic governance instruments, Policy Sciences, 49(1): 35–53. doi: 10.1007/s11077-015-9239-4
Schneider, J. and Fowler, L. (2024) Critical race theory, policy ambiguity and implementation: a Multiple Streams Framework analysis, Policy & Politics, 52(2): 321–40. doi: 10.1332/03055736y2023d000000023
Seawright, J. (2016) Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Small, T. (2018) Do climate resiliency the right way, CommonWealth Beacon, 1 April, https://commonwealthbeacon.org/opinion/do-climate-resiliency-rhe-right-way/.
Staff, H. (2020) The Political Economy of Private Security: How European States Privatize, Regulate and Produce Domestic Security, Vienna: Lit.
Taylor, K., DeLeo, R.A., Zarb, S., Jeschke, N. and Birkland, T. (2023) Subnational focusing events and agenda change: the case of toxic algae bloom and contaminated drinking water in Toledo, Ohio, in N. Zahariadis, N. Herweg, R. Zohlnhöfer and E. Petridou (eds) A Modern Guide to the Multiple Steams Framework, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp 222–45.
Union of Concerned Scientists (2017) Clean Energy Momentum: Ranking State Progress, Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists, https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/clean-energy-momentum-ranking-state-progress#ucs-report-downloads.
van den Dool, A. (2023) The Multiple Streams Framework in a nondemocracy: the infeasibility of a national ban on live poultry sales in China, Policy Studies Journal, 51(2): 327–49. doi: 10.1111/psj.12456
Yusuf, J.E., Neill, K., St John, B., III, Ash, I.K. and Mahar, K. (2016) The sea is rising … but not onto the policy agenda: a multiple streams approach to understanding sea level rise policies, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 34(2): 228–43. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614457
Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N. and Zahariadis, N. (2022) How to conduct a multiple streams study, in C.M. Weible and S. Workman (eds) Methods of the Policy Process, New York: Routledge, pp 23–50.
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 566 | 566 | 85 |
Full Text Views | 224 | 224 | 34 |
PDF Downloads | 202 | 202 | 38 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here