Analysing policy actors’ preferences for different modes of governing in local government

Authors:
Bram Verschuere Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Bram Verschuere in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Arne Roets Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Arne Roets in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Kristof Steyvers Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Kristof Steyvers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Bram Wauters Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Bram Wauters in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Liese Berkvens Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Liese Berkvens in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Nina De Smedt Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Nina De Smedt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Willem Goutry Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Willem Goutry in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Gilles Pittoors Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Gilles Pittoors in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ruben Van Severen Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Ruben Van Severen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Tessa Haesevoets Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Tessa Haesevoets in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Effective citizen participation in policy decision making depends on the support of all democratic actors involved: citizens, but also politicians and civil servants. Drawing on data from over 4,000 respondents, we explore the existence of so-called ‘multi-actor clusters’, that is, groups of people who are characterised by a positive (or negative) stance towards different modes of local policy decision making, irrespective of their formal-institutional role (politician, civil servant or citizen). Cluster analysis shows two large clusters of respondents that clearly prefer participatory over representative policy decision making. The analysis also highlights a substantial cluster of respondents who clearly prefer representative policy decision making modes over participatory ones. Further analysis shows that a democratic actor’s cluster membership is better predicted by individual (ideological) variables (such as left-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation), compared to contextual variables (like governing capacity, democratic quality, and social capital of the municipality in which the actors work and/or live). This research is important because it challenges the assumption that citizen participation is to be considered primarily as (part of) the solution for local governance problems like a lack of governing capacity, low social capital or decreased democratic quality in/of specific local communities. In this way, it contributes to our understanding of participatory forms of governance.

  • Altemeyer, B. (1983) Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

  • Andeweg, R.B. and Thomassen, J.J.A. (2005) Modes of political representation: toward a new typology, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(4): 50728. doi: 10.3162/036298005x201653

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bedock, C. and Pilet, J.B. (2021) Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens, Government and Opposition, 56(3): 485504. doi: 10.1017/gov.2020.1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bedock, C. and Pilet, J.B. (2023) Enraged, engaged, or both? A study of the determinants of support for consultative vs. binding mini-publics, Representation, 59(1): 3353. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2020.1778511

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bengtsson, Å. and Mattila, M. (2009) Direct democracy and its critics: support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland, West European Politics, 32(5): 103148. doi: 10.1080/01402380903065256

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Binnema, H., Michels, A., ’t Hart, P. and van der Torre, E. (2020) Democratic innovations in Dutch local government: experimentation in search of strategy, Public Sector Innovation Journal, 25(1): art 5, https://innovation.cc/wp-content/uploads/2020_25_1_5_binnema_michels_hart_torre.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, H.S. (2020) How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis, European Political Science Review, 12(2): 23953. doi: 10.1017/s1755773920000107

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C.G. and Atkinson, Q.D. (2020) The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology, Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 33645. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coffé, H. and Michels, A. (2014) Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy, Electoral Studies, 35: 111. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A. and Kossowska, M. (2009) Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style, Journal of Personality, 77(1): 5188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Costello, T.H., Bowes, S.M., Stevens, S.T., Waldman, I.D., Tasimi, A. and Lilienfeld, S.O. (2022) Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1): 13570. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000341

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danielsson, M., Hertting, N. and Klijn, E.H. (2018) Tricky for good reasons: institutionalizing local participatory governance in representative democracy, in N. Hertting and C. Kugelberg (eds) Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy: Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities, New York: Routledge, pp 1848.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dean, R. (2019) Control or influence? Conflict or solidarity? Understanding diversity in preferences for public participation in social policy decision making, Social Policy & Administration, 53(1): 17087. doi: 10.1111/spol.12445

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duckitt, J. (2001) A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice, in M.P. Zanna (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp 41113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C. G. (2009) A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice, Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3): 98109. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028540

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elstub, S. and Escobar, O. (2019) Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Ewens, H. and van der Voet, J. (2019) Organizational complexity and participatory innovation: participatory budgeting in local government, Public Management Review, 21(12): 184866. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1577908

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fernández-Martínez, J.L., García-Espín, P. and Jiménez-Sánchez, M. (2020) Participatory frustration: the unintended cultural effect of local democratic innovations, Administration & Society, 52(5): 71848. doi: 10.1177/0095399719833628

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fung, A. (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future, Public Administration Review, 75(4): 51322. doi: 10.1111/puar.12361

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geissel, B. and Newton, K. (eds) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, Abingdon: Routledge

  • Haesevoets, T., Roets, A., Steyvers, K., Verschuere, B. and Wauters, B. (2024) Towards a multifaceted measure of perceived legitimacy of participatory governance, Governance, 37(3): 71128. doi: 10.1111/gove.12800

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haesevoets, T., Roets, A., Van Severen, R., Dierckx, K. and Verschuere, B. (2023) The public’s preferred level of involvement in local policy-making, Scientific Reports, 13(1): art 7146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34282-w

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendriks, F. (2023) Rethinking Democratic Innovation: Cultural Clashes and the Reform of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hertting, N. and Kugelberg, C. (eds) (2018) Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy: Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities, New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.E., et al (2015) The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6): 100328. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ianniello, M., Iacuzzi, S., Fedele, P. and Brusati, L. (2019) Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review, Public Management Review, 21(1): 2146. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Junius, N., Matthieu, J., Caluwaerts, D. and Erzeel, S. (2020) Is it interests, ideas or institutions? Explaining elected representatives’ positions toward democratic innovations in 15 European countries, Frontiers in Political Science, 2: art 584439. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.584439

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karlsson, M. (2012) Participatory initiatives and political representation: the case of local councillors in Sweden, Local Government Studies, 38(6): 795815. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.688036

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koskimaa, V. and Rapeli, L. (2020) Fit to govern? Comparing citizen and policymaker perceptions of deliberative democratic innovations, Policy & Politics, 48(4): 63752. doi: 10.1332/030557320x15870515357288

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kübler, D., Rochat, P.E., Woo, S.Y. and van der Heiden, N. (2020) Strengthen governability rather than deepen democracy: why local governments introduce participatory governance, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3): 40926. doi: 10.1177/0020852318801508

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kuhlmann, S. and Wollmann, H. (2011) The evaluation of institutional reforms at sub-national government levels: a still neglected research agenda, Local Government Studies, 37(5): 47994. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.604542

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, H. and Zhang, J. (2017) How do civic associations foster political participation? The role of scope and intensity of organizational involvement, Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(1): 324. doi: 10.1515/npf-2016-0010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liao, Y. and Schachter, H.L. (2018) Exploring the antecedents of municipal managers’ attitudes towards citizen participation, Public Management Review, 20(9): 1287308. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1363903

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F. and Lidström, A. (eds) (2011) The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manson, J.H. (2020) Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism, Personality and Individual Differences, 167: art 110251. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110251

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marien, S. (2011) The effect of electoral outcomes on political trust: a multi-level analysis of 23 countries, Electoral Studies, 30(4): 71226. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Migchelbrink, K. and Van de Walle, S. (2020) When will public officials listen? A vignette experiment on the effects of input legitimacy on public officials’ willingness to use public participation, Public Administration Review, 80(2): 27180. doi: 10.1111/puar.13138

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Migchelbrink, K. and Van de Walle, S. (2022) A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation, Local Government Studies, 48(1): 122. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2021.1885379

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nederhand, J. and Edelenbos, J. (2023) Legitimate public participation: a Q-methodology on the views of politicians, Public Administration Review, 83(3): 52236. doi: 10.1111/puar.13556

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osborne, D., Costello, T.H., Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C.G. (2023) The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism, Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(4): 22032. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00161-4

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pateman, C. (2012) Participatory democracy revisited, Perspectives on Politics, 10(1): 719. doi: 10.1017/s1537592711004877

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M. and Malle, B.F. (1994) Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4): 74163. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Steyvers, K. (2022) Belgium: between national barometer and local atmosphere, in A. Gendźwiłł, U. Kjaer and K. Steyvers (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 11425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steyvers, K., De Ceuninck, K., Valcke, T. and Verhelst, T. (2022) Intra-state government and representation in Belgium: navigating a labyrinth or maze?, in C. Copus, R. Kerley and A. Jones (eds) A Modern Guide to Local and Regional Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 199216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strandberg, K., Backström, K., Berg, J. and Karv, T. (2021) Democratically sustainable local development? The outcomes of mixed deliberation on a municipal merger on participants’ social trust, political trust, and political efficacy, Sustainability, 13(13): art 7231. doi: 10.3390/su13137231

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walsh, C.D. and Elkink, J.A. (2021) The dissatisfied and the engaged: citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate, Irish Political Studies, 36(4): 64766. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2021.1974717

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wauters, B. (2024) Personalization at different levels: intra-party competition and preference voting in local elections, Party Politics, 39(1): 4860. doi: 10.1177/13540688231179023

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Webb, P. (2013) Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom, European Journal of Political Research, 52(6): 74772. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12021

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, K. (2005) Public administrators’ trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts, Public Administration Review, 65(3): 27385. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary_AppendixS1.docx (DOC 271 KB)
Bram Verschuere Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Bram Verschuere in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Arne Roets Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Arne Roets in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Kristof Steyvers Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Kristof Steyvers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Bram Wauters Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Bram Wauters in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Liese Berkvens Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Liese Berkvens in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Nina De Smedt Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Nina De Smedt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Willem Goutry Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Willem Goutry in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Gilles Pittoors Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Gilles Pittoors in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ruben Van Severen Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Ruben Van Severen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Tessa Haesevoets Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Tessa Haesevoets in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 547 548 198
Full Text Views 104 104 41
PDF Downloads 114 114 42

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy