Effective citizen participation in policy decision making depends on the support of all democratic actors involved: citizens, but also politicians and civil servants. Drawing on data from over 4,000 respondents, we explore the existence of so-called ‘multi-actor clusters’, that is, groups of people who are characterised by a positive (or negative) stance towards different modes of local policy decision making, irrespective of their formal-institutional role (politician, civil servant or citizen). Cluster analysis shows two large clusters of respondents that clearly prefer participatory over representative policy decision making. The analysis also highlights a substantial cluster of respondents who clearly prefer representative policy decision making modes over participatory ones. Further analysis shows that a democratic actor’s cluster membership is better predicted by individual (ideological) variables (such as left-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation), compared to contextual variables (like governing capacity, democratic quality, and social capital of the municipality in which the actors work and/or live). This research is important because it challenges the assumption that citizen participation is to be considered primarily as (part of) the solution for local governance problems like a lack of governing capacity, low social capital or decreased democratic quality in/of specific local communities. In this way, it contributes to our understanding of participatory forms of governance.
Altemeyer, B. (1983) Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Andeweg, R.B. and Thomassen, J.J.A. (2005) Modes of political representation: toward a new typology, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(4): 507–28. doi: 10.3162/036298005x201653
Bedock, C. and Pilet, J.B. (2021) Who supports citizens selected by lot to be the main policymakers? A study of French citizens, Government and Opposition, 56(3): 485–504. doi: 10.1017/gov.2020.1
Bedock, C. and Pilet, J.B. (2023) Enraged, engaged, or both? A study of the determinants of support for consultative vs. binding mini-publics, Representation, 59(1): 33–53. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2020.1778511
Bengtsson, Å. and Mattila, M. (2009) Direct democracy and its critics: support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland, West European Politics, 32(5): 1031–48. doi: 10.1080/01402380903065256
Binnema, H., Michels, A., ’t Hart, P. and van der Torre, E. (2020) Democratic innovations in Dutch local government: experimentation in search of strategy, Public Sector Innovation Journal, 25(1): art 5, https://innovation.cc/wp-content/uploads/2020_25_1_5_binnema_michels_hart_torre.pdf.
Christensen, H.S. (2020) How citizens evaluate participatory processes: a conjoint analysis, European Political Science Review, 12(2): 239–53. doi: 10.1017/s1755773920000107
Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C.G. and Atkinson, Q.D. (2020) The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology, Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 336–45. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9
Coffé, H. and Michels, A. (2014) Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy, Electoral Studies, 35: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006
Cornelis, I., Van Hiel, A., Roets, A. and Kossowska, M. (2009) Age differences in conservatism: evidence on the mediating effects of personality and cognitive style, Journal of Personality, 77(1): 51–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00538.x
Costello, T.H., Bowes, S.M., Stevens, S.T., Waldman, I.D., Tasimi, A. and Lilienfeld, S.O. (2022) Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1): 135–70. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000341
Danielsson, M., Hertting, N. and Klijn, E.H. (2018) Tricky for good reasons: institutionalizing local participatory governance in representative democracy, in N. Hertting and C. Kugelberg (eds) Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy: Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities, New York: Routledge, pp 18–48.
Dean, R. (2019) Control or influence? Conflict or solidarity? Understanding diversity in preferences for public participation in social policy decision making, Social Policy & Administration, 53(1): 170–87. doi: 10.1111/spol.12445
Duckitt, J. (2001) A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice, in M.P. Zanna (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp 41–113.
Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C. G. (2009) A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice, Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3): 98–109. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028540
Elstub, S. and Escobar, O. (2019) Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ewens, H. and van der Voet, J. (2019) Organizational complexity and participatory innovation: participatory budgeting in local government, Public Management Review, 21(12): 1848–66. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1577908
Fernández-Martínez, J.L., García-Espín, P. and Jiménez-Sánchez, M. (2020) Participatory frustration: the unintended cultural effect of local democratic innovations, Administration & Society, 52(5): 718–48. doi: 10.1177/0095399719833628
Fung, A. (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future, Public Administration Review, 75(4): 513–22. doi: 10.1111/puar.12361
Geissel, B. and Newton, K. (eds) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, Abingdon: Routledge
Haesevoets, T., Roets, A., Steyvers, K., Verschuere, B. and Wauters, B. (2024) Towards a multifaceted measure of perceived legitimacy of participatory governance, Governance, 37(3): 711–28. doi: 10.1111/gove.12800
Haesevoets, T., Roets, A., Van Severen, R., Dierckx, K. and Verschuere, B. (2023) The public’s preferred level of involvement in local policy-making, Scientific Reports, 13(1): art 7146. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34282-w
Hendriks, F. (2023) Rethinking Democratic Innovation: Cultural Clashes and the Reform of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hertting, N. and Kugelberg, C. (eds) (2018) Local Participatory Governance and Representative Democracy: Institutional Dilemmas in European Cities, New York: Routledge.
Ho, A.K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K.E., et al (2015) The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6): 1003–28. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000033
Ianniello, M., Iacuzzi, S., Fedele, P. and Brusati, L. (2019) Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review, Public Management Review, 21(1): 21–46. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1438499
Junius, N., Matthieu, J., Caluwaerts, D. and Erzeel, S. (2020) Is it interests, ideas or institutions? Explaining elected representatives’ positions toward democratic innovations in 15 European countries, Frontiers in Political Science, 2: art 584439. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2020.584439
Karlsson, M. (2012) Participatory initiatives and political representation: the case of local councillors in Sweden, Local Government Studies, 38(6): 795–815. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.688036
Koskimaa, V. and Rapeli, L. (2020) Fit to govern? Comparing citizen and policymaker perceptions of deliberative democratic innovations, Policy & Politics, 48(4): 637–52. doi: 10.1332/030557320x15870515357288
Kübler, D., Rochat, P.E., Woo, S.Y. and van der Heiden, N. (2020) Strengthen governability rather than deepen democracy: why local governments introduce participatory governance, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3): 409–26. doi: 10.1177/0020852318801508
Kuhlmann, S. and Wollmann, H. (2011) The evaluation of institutional reforms at sub-national government levels: a still neglected research agenda, Local Government Studies, 37(5): 479–94. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.604542
Li, H. and Zhang, J. (2017) How do civic associations foster political participation? The role of scope and intensity of organizational involvement, Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(1): 3–24. doi: 10.1515/npf-2016-0010
Liao, Y. and Schachter, H.L. (2018) Exploring the antecedents of municipal managers’ attitudes towards citizen participation, Public Management Review, 20(9): 1287–308. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1363903
Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F. and Lidström, A. (eds) (2011) The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manson, J.H. (2020) Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism, Personality and Individual Differences, 167: art 110251. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110251
Marien, S. (2011) The effect of electoral outcomes on political trust: a multi-level analysis of 23 countries, Electoral Studies, 30(4): 712–26. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.015
Migchelbrink, K. and Van de Walle, S. (2020) When will public officials listen? A vignette experiment on the effects of input legitimacy on public officials’ willingness to use public participation, Public Administration Review, 80(2): 271–80. doi: 10.1111/puar.13138
Migchelbrink, K. and Van de Walle, S. (2022) A systematic review of the literature on determinants of public managers’ attitudes toward public participation, Local Government Studies, 48(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2021.1885379
Nederhand, J. and Edelenbos, J. (2023) Legitimate public participation: a Q-methodology on the views of politicians, Public Administration Review, 83(3): 522–36. doi: 10.1111/puar.13556
Osborne, D., Costello, T.H., Duckitt, J. and Sibley, C.G. (2023) The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism, Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(4): 220–32. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00161-4
Pateman, C. (2012) Participatory democracy revisited, Perspectives on Politics, 10(1): 7–19. doi: 10.1017/s1537592711004877
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M. and Malle, B.F. (1994) Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4): 741–63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steyvers, K. (2022) Belgium: between national barometer and local atmosphere, in A. Gendźwiłł, U. Kjaer and K. Steyvers (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 114–25.
Steyvers, K., De Ceuninck, K., Valcke, T. and Verhelst, T. (2022) Intra-state government and representation in Belgium: navigating a labyrinth or maze?, in C. Copus, R. Kerley and A. Jones (eds) A Modern Guide to Local and Regional Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 199–216.
Strandberg, K., Backström, K., Berg, J. and Karv, T. (2021) Democratically sustainable local development? The outcomes of mixed deliberation on a municipal merger on participants’ social trust, political trust, and political efficacy, Sustainability, 13(13): art 7231. doi: 10.3390/su13137231
Walsh, C.D. and Elkink, J.A. (2021) The dissatisfied and the engaged: citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate, Irish Political Studies, 36(4): 647–66. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2021.1974717
Wauters, B. (2024) Personalization at different levels: intra-party competition and preference voting in local elections, Party Politics, 39(1): 48–60. doi: 10.1177/13540688231179023
Webb, P. (2013) Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom, European Journal of Political Research, 52(6): 747–72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12021
Yang, K. (2005) Public administrators’ trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts, Public Administration Review, 65(3): 273–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 547 | 548 | 198 |
Full Text Views | 104 | 104 | 41 |
PDF Downloads | 114 | 114 | 42 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here