Cover Voluntary Sector Review
Voluntary Sector Review
An international journal of third sector research, policy and practice

I will only help if others tell me to do so! The simultaneous influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on donations

Authors: Ilia Gugenishvilihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-91491 and Jonas Colliander2
View author details View Less
  • 1 Åbo Akademi University, , Finland
  • | 2 Stockholm School of Economics, , Sweden
Article Category:
Research Article
Copyright:
© Policy Press 2022
Online Publication Date:
04 Apr 2022
Pages:
1–24
Publisher:
Policy Press
Volume/Issue:
Early View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1332/204080521X16442337687557
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
Add to cart (GBP  £25.00)

To address the gaps in the understanding of how social norms can be used to increase charitable donations, we conducted two experiments with 347 participants. We demonstrated the following: (a) that the norms supporting or not supporting charitable donations influence donation intentions; (b) that injunctive norms (what the majority of people approve of) have stronger influences on donation intentions than descriptive ones (what the majority of people do); and (c) that when injunctive and descriptive norms do not align, they demotivate individuals to donate by reducing perceptions of collective efficacy. Our findings expand the literature on charitable donation, social norms and collective efficacy and offer insights for charitable organisations in terms of increasing donations by crafting convincing marketing content.

  • Agerström, J., Carlsson, R., Nicklasson, L. and Guntell, L. (2016) Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: the power of local norms, Journal of Economic Psychology, 52: 147–53.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ajzen, I. (2002) Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Constructing-a-TpB-Questionnaire%3A-Conceptual-and-Ajzen/6074b33b529ea56c175095872fa40798f8141867?p2df.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Andersson, P.A., Erlandsson, A. and Västfjäll, D. (2022) Norm avoiders: the effect of optional descriptive norms on charitable donations, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(1): e2244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bardsley, N. (2008) Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?, Experimental Economics, 11(2): 122–33. doi: 10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2011a) A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5): 924–73. doi: 10.1177/0899764010380927

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. (2011b) Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part One: religion, education, age and socialization, Voluntary Sector Review, 2(3): 337–65. doi: 10.1332/204080511X6087712

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bergquist, M. and Nilsson, A. (2019) The DOs and DON’Ts in social norms: a descriptive Don’t‐norm increases conformity, Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(3): 158–66. doi: 10.1002/jts5.43

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bicchieri, C. (2005) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bicchieri, C. and Dimant, E. (2019) Nudging with care: the risks and benefits of social information, Public Choice: 1–30.

  • Brown, S., Srivastava, P. and Taylor, K. (2012) Preach what you Practice? Donating Behaviour of Parents and their Offspring, Working Paper, Sheffield: University of Sheffield.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cestac, J., Paran, F. and Delhomme, P. (2014) Drive as I say, not as I drive: influence of injunctive and descriptive norms on speeding intentions among young drivers, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23: 44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Charities Aid Foundation (2020) UK giving and Covid-19, https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/caf-uk-giving-2020-covid-19.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, Y., Zhu, L. and Chen, Z. (2013) Family income affects children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game, PloS One, 8(11): e80419. doi: 10.1371/annotation/dd945f7c-c50b-461d-ab38-15e8b0966458

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G.L. and Prinstein, M.J. (2015) Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: an experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents’ intentions to volunteer, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12): 2197–210. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0373-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cialdini, R.B. and Goldstein, N.J. (2004) Social influence: compliance and conformity, Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R. and Kallgren, C.A. (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6): 1015–26. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Colliander, J. and Marder, B. (2018) ‘Snap happy’ brands: Increasing publicity effectiveness through a snapshot aesthetic when marketing a brand on Instagram. Computers in Human Behavior, 78: 34–43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Craig, C.M., Brooks, M.E. and Bichard, S. (2021) Prosocial consumer socialization: how socialization agents impact prosocial attitudes and behavior, Atlantic Journal of Communication, 29(3): 136–50. doi: 10.1080/15456870.2020.1751627

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Croson, R., Handy, F. and Shang, J. (2009) Keeping up with the Joneses: the relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(4): 467–89. doi: 10.1002/nml.232

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies, J., Foxall, G.R. and Pallister, J. (2002) Beyond the intention–behaviour mythology: an integrated model of recycling, Marketing Theory, 2(1): 29–113. doi: 10.1177/1470593102002001645

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davis, R.E., Couper, M.P., Janz, N.K., Caldwell, C.H. and Resnicow, K. (2010) Interviewer effects in public health surveys, Health Education Research, 25(1): 14–26. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp046

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Festinger, L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2): 117–40.

  • Frey, B.S. and Meier, S. (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment, American Economic Review, 94(5): 1717–22. doi: 10.1257/0002828043052187

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gibson, C.B. (1999) Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures, Academy of Management Journal, 42(2): 138–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Göckeritz, S., Schultz, P.W., Rendón, T., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J. and Griskevicius, V. (2010) Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: the moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs, European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3): 514–23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Habib, R., White, K. and Hoegg, J. (2021) Everybody thinks we should but nobody does: how combined injunctive and descriptive norms motivate organ donor registration, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3): 621–30. doi: 10.1002/jcpy.1220

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hayes, A.F. (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach, 2nd edn, New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hornikx, J., Hendriks, B. and Thijzen, D. (2010) The effects of cultural adaptation in fundraising letters: the case of Help-self and Help-others appeals in a feminine culture, Communications, 35(1): 93–110. doi: 10.1515/comm.2010.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hysenbelli, D., Rubaltelli, E. and Rumiati, R. (2013) Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving, Judgment & Decision Making, 8(6): 678–90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Internal Revenue Service (2021) Tax-exempt status for your organization, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p557.pdf.

  • Jones, E. E. and Gerard, H. B. (1967) Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.

  • Lapinski, M.K. and Rimal, R.N. (2005) An explication of social norms, Communication Theory, 15(2): 127–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lindersson, L., Guntell, L., Carlsson, R. and Agerström, J. (2019) Reassessing the impact of descriptive norms on charitable giving, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(1): e1617. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.1617

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Maccoby, E.E. (2014) Historical overview of socialization research and theory, in J.E. Grusec and P.D. Hastings (eds) Handbook of Socialization, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp 1–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Martin, R. and Randal, J. (2008) How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(1): 228–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McAuliffe, K., Raihani, N.J. and Dunham, Y. (2017) Children are sensitive to norms of giving, Cognition, 167: 151–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McDonald, R.I., Fielding, K.S. and Louis, W.R. (2014) Conflicting norms highlight the need for action, Environment and Behavior, 46(2): 139–62. doi: 10.1177/0013916512453992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mesch, D.J., Dwyer, P.C., Sherrin, S., Osili, U., Bergdoll, J., Pactor, A. and Ackerman, J. (2018) Encouraging giving to women’s & girls’ causes: the role of social norms, https://givingcompass.org/partners/gender-and-giving/report-social-norms.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nadler, J. (2017) Expressive law, social norms, and social groups, Law & Social Inquiry, 42(1): 60–75.

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) The measurement of meaning, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

  • Olson, M. (2009) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, second printing with a new preface and appendix, Vol. 124, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ottoni-Wilhelm, M., Zhang, Y., Estell, D.B. and Perdue, N.H. (2017) Raising charitable children: the effects of verbal socialization and role-modeling on children’s giving, Journal of Population Economics, 30(1): 189–224. doi: 10.1007/s00148-016-0604-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Raihani, N.J. and McAuliffe, K. (2014) Dictator game giving: the importance of descriptive versus injunctive norms, PloS One, 9(12): e113826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113826

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Reyniers, D. and Bhalla, R. (2013) Reluctant altruism and peer pressure in charitable giving, Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1): 7–15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rimal, R.N. and Real, K. (2003) Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors, Communication Theory, 13(2): 184–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00288.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Salamon, L. M. and Anheier, H. K. (1996) The emerging nonprofit sector: An overview, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Salamon, L. M., Hems, L. C. and Chinnock, K. (2000) The nonprofit sector: For what and for whom? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shang, J. and Croson, R. (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods, The Economic Journal, 119(540): 1422–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02267.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, J.R. and Louis, W.R. (2008) Do as we say and as we do: the interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship, British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4): 647–66. doi: 10.1348/014466607X269748

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, J.R., Louis, W.R., Terry, D.J., Greenaway, K.H., Clarke, M.R. and Cheng, X. (2012) Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4): 353–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, J.R. and McSweeney, A. (2007) Charitable giving: the effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behavior, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5): 363–86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stapel, D.A. and Blanton, H. (2007) Social Comparison Theories: Key Readings, Hove: Psychology Press.

  • Thomas, E.F., McGarty, C., Reese, G., Berndsen, M. and Bliuc, A.M. (2016) Where there is a (collective) will, there are (effective) ways: integrating individual- and group-level factors in explaining humanitarian collective action, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12): 1678–92. doi: 10.1177/0146167216669134

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, K. (2017) An introduction to culture, socialisation, and social norms, https://revisesociology.com/2017/08/04/culture-socialisation-social-norms-introduction.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C. and Crone, E.A. (2016) Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(1): 90–100. doi: 10.1111/jora.12173

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vargas, P.T., Duff, B.R. and Faber, R.J. (2017) A practical guide to experimental advertising research, Journal of Advertising, 46(1): 101–14. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2017.1281779

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wiepking, P. and Bekkers, R. (2012) Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part Two: Gender, family composition and income, Voluntary Sector Review, 3(2): 217–45. doi: 10.1332/204080512X649379

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Ilia Gugenishvilihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7657-91491 and Jonas Colliander2
  • 1 Åbo Akademi University, , Finland
  • | 2 Stockholm School of Economics, , Sweden

jonas.colliander@hhs.se

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 35 35 35
Full Text Views 36 36 2
PDF Downloads 31 31 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions