Labour platforms as mechanisms of class reproduction: middle-class interests as the basis of worker consent

Authors:
Steven P. Vallas Northeastern University, USA

Search for other papers by Steven P. Vallas in
Current site
Google Scholar Close
and
Juliet B. Schor Boston College, USA

Search for other papers by Juliet B. Schor in
Current site
Google Scholar Close
Article Category:
Research Article
Copyright:
© Authors 2024
Online Publication Date:
13 Sep 2024
Pages:
1–24
Publisher:
Bristol University Press
Volume/Issue:
Early View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1332/27324176Y2024D000000023
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article
Buy article/chapter (
GBP  £25.00
)

Expansion of the platform economy has given rise to a paradox in the literature on gig work: Given capital’s imposition of algorithmic controls, why do so many platform workers express support and appreciation for gig work, viewing it as enhancing their autonomy? Approaches toward this question have advanced numerous explanations, such as gamification, neoliberal norms, and entrepreneurial culture. We find these efforts only partially successful, as they fail to explain why ideological incorporation so readily succeeds. We argue that responses to gig work are a function of the class positions that gig workers hold in the wider society, which lead to distinct orientations that they bring to gig work. For workers with a foothold in the middle class, gig work provides access to job rewards that may no longer be available via the conventional economy alone. They consequently experience gig work as a labour of affirmation – a stark contrast with the experience of those gig workers who hold subordinate positions in the class structure. Interview data with 70 respondents in the ride-hail, grocery-shopping and food-delivery sectors supports this approach. Consent to gig work is strongest among our better-off respondents, who hold more secure positions in the conventional economy and use gig work as a culturally-sanctioned mechanism of class reproduction. The implication is that class-based divisions among the platform workforce warrant greater attention than labour process theory has allowed.

  • Atkinson, W. (2007) Beck, individualization and the death of class: a critique, British Journal of Sociology, 58(3): 349–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00155.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Auguste, D., Roll, S. and Despard, M. (2023) Democratizing the economy or introducing economic risk? Gig work during the COVID-19 pandemic, Work and Occupations. doi: 10.1177/07308884231202032

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital, in J. G. Richardson (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood, pp 241–58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Braverman, H. (1974) Labour and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review.

  • Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent: The Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

  • Burawoy, M. (1985) The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism, London: Verso.

  • Burawoy, M. (2018) Making sense of Bourdieu, Catalyst: A Journal of Theory & Strategy, 2(1).

  • Cameron, L. (2024) The making of the ‘good bad’ job: how algorithmic management manufactures consent through constant and confined choices, Administrative Science Quarterly, 69(2). doi: 10.1177/00018392241236163

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cant, C. (2019) Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the New Economy, Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Chen, M.K., Chevalier, J.A., Rossi, P.E. and Oehlsen, E. (2017) The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 23296.

  • Davis, G. (2016) The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy, Oakland, CA: Berrett-Kohler.

  • Dubal, V. (2017) Wage-slave or entrepreneur? Contesting the dualism of legal worker categories, California Law Review, 105(1): 65–126. doi: 10.15779/Z38M84X

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dubal, V. (2019) An Uber ambivalence: employee status, worker perspectives, & regulation in the gig economy, UC Hastings Research Paper, 381. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3488009

  • Dubal, V. (2021) The new racial wage code, Harvard Law and Policy Review, 15: 511. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3855094

  • Dunn, M. (2020) Making gigs work: digital platforms, job quality and worker motivations, New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(2): 232–49. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12167

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Edwards, P.K. (1990) Understanding conflict in the labour process: the logic and autonomy of struggle, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds) Labour Process Theory, London: Macmillan, pp 125–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Faraj, S., Pachidi, S. and Sayegh, K. (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm, Information and Organization, 28(1): 62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Forde, C., Stuart, M., Joyce, S., Oliver, L., Valizade, D., Alberti, G., et al (2017) The Social Protection of Workers in the Platform Economy. Rep. PE 614.184, Brussels: European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/614184/IPOL_STU(2017)614184_EN.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Galière, S. (2020) When food-delivery platform workers consent to algorithmic management: a Foucauldian perspective, New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(3): 357–70. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12177

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gandini, A. (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy, Human Relations, 72(6): 1039–56. doi: 10.1177/0018726718790002

  • Goggin, J. (2011) Playbour, farming and leisure, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 11(4): 357–58, https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/11-4goggin.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L. and Milkman, R. (2019) Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5: 1–15. doi: 10.1177/2378023119870041

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jackson, E. (2022) Availability of the gig economy and long run labor supply effects for the unemployed, in 2021 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Fall Research Conference. March.

  • Johnston, H., Ergun, O., Schor, J. and Chen, L. (2023a) Employment status and the on-demand economy: a natural experiment on reclassification, Socio-Economic Review, 22(1): 169–94. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwad047

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Josserand, E. and Kaine, S. (2019) Different directions or the same route? The varied identities of ride-share drivers, Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4): 549–73. doi: 10.1177/0022185619848461

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Joyce, S. (2020) Rediscovering the cash nexus, again: subsumption and the labour–capital relation in platform work, Capital & Class, 44(4): 541–52. doi: 10.1177/0309816820906356

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Joyce, S. and Stuart, M. (2021) Digitalised management, control and resistance in platform work: a labour process analysis, in J. Haidar and M. Keune (eds) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp 158–84.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kellogg, K.C., Valentine, M.A. and Christin, A. (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control, Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 366–410. doi: 10.5465/annals.2018.0174

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kenney, M. and Zysman, J. (2016) The rise of the platform economy, Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3): 61–69.

  • Lehdonverta, V. (2018) Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms, New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1): 13–29. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12102

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lei, Y.W. (2021) Delivering solidarity: platform architecture and collective contention in China’s platform economy, American Sociological Review, 86(2): 279–309. doi: 10.1177/0003122420979980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Longhurst, B. and Savage, M. (1997) Social class, consumption and the influence of Bourdieu: some critical issues, Sociological Review, 44(1_suppl): 274–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1996.tb03445.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marshall, G. (1997) Repositioning Class: Social Inequality in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Marx, K. (1990) Capital, vol 1, B. Fowkes (trans) New York: Penguin Books.

  • Mommadova, Y. (2024) A tale of two platforms: habitus as the structuring force of gig workers’ experience, New Technology, Work and Employment. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12304

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morales, K. and Stecher, A. (2023) Platform capitalism and neo‐normative control: ‘autonomy’ as a digital platform control strategy in neoliberal Chile, New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2): 230–51. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12258

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Poulantzas, N. (1975) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London: Verso Books.

  • Pulignano, V. and Franke, M. (2022) Control and consent regime dynamics within labour platforms, Work in the Global Economy, 2(2): 149–75. doi: 10.1332/273241721x16654825793852

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Purcell, C. and Brook, P. (2022) At least I’m my own boss! Explaining consent, coercion and resistance in platform work, Work, Employment and Society, 36(3): 391–406. doi: 10.1177/0950017020952661

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rachman, H.A. (2024) Inside the Invisible Cage: How Algorithms Control Workers, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

  • Ravenelle, A.J. (2019) Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Rochet, J.C. and Tirole, J. (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4): 990–1029. doi: 10.1162/154247603322493212

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rosenblat, A. and Stark, L. (2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of Uber’s drivers, International Journal of Communication, 10: 3758–84, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4892/1739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sayer, A. (2005) The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488863

  • Schneider, D. and Harknett, K. (2019) Consequences of routine work-schedule instability for worker health and well-being, American Sociological Review, 84(1): 82–114. doi: 10.1177/0003122418823184

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schor, J.B. (2017) Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent? Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2): 263–79. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsw047

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schor, J.B. (2020) After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schor, J.B., Tirrell, C. and Vallas, S.P. (2023) Consent and contestation: how platform workers reckon with the risks of gig labor, Work, Employment and Society. doi: 10.1177/09500170231199404

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shibata, S. (2019) Gig work and the discourse of autonomy: fictitious freedom in Japan’s digital economy, New Political Economy, 25(4): 535–51. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1613351

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Smith, A. (2016) Gig Work, Online Selling and Home Sharing, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/17/gig-work-online-selling-and-home-sharing/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Srnicek, N. (2016) Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.

  • Sundararajan, A. (2016) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Tassinari, A. and Maccarrone, V. (2020) Riders on the storm: workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK, Work, Employment and Society, 34(1): 35–54. doi: 10.1177/0950017019862954

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, P. (1990) Crawling from the wreckage: the labour process and the politics of production, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds) Labour Process Theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 95–124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, P. and Newsome, K. (2004) Labor process theory, work and the employment relation, in B.E. Kaufman (ed) Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp 133–62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tirrell, C. (2023) Labor Control and the Experience of Work in the Platform Economy, PhD dissertation, Northeastern University.

  • Vallas, S.P. (1993) Power in the Workplace: The Politics of Production at AT&T, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Vallas, S.P. (2019) Platform capitalism: what’s at stake for workers? New Labor Forum, 28(1): 48–59. doi: 10.1177/1095796018817059

  • Vallas, S.P. and Hill, A. (2012) Conceptualizing power in organizations, in D. Courpasson, D. Golsorkhi and J.J. Sallaz (eds) Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets, Bingley: Emerald, pp 165–97. doi: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000034009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vallas, S. and Schor, J.B. (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy, Annual Review of Sociology, 46: 273–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Veen, A., Barratt, T. and Goods, C. (2019) Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’ for control: a labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia, Work, Employment and Society, 34(3): 388–406. doi: 10.1177/0950017019836911

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vieira, T. (2023) Platform couriers’ self‐exploitation: the case study of Glovo, New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(3): 493–512. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12272

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weeks, K. (2011) The Problem With Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weininger, E.B. (2005) Foundations of Pierre Bourdieu’s class analysis, in E.O. Wright (ed) Approaches to Class Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 82–118. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511488900.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Westergaard, J. (1970) The rediscovery of the cash nexus, Socialist Register, 7, https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wiener, M., Cram, W.A. and Benlian, A. (2023) Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers, European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3): 485–507. doi: 10.1080/0960085x.2021.1977729

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wood, A.J. (2021) Workplace regimes: a sociological defence and elaboration, Work in the Global Economy, 1(1–2): 119–38. doi: 10.1332/273241721x16286069087710

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wood, A.J. and Lehdonverta, M.G.V. (2021) Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy, Socio-Economic Review, 19(4): 1369–96. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwab016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wood, A.J., Lehdonverta, M.G.V. and Hjorth, I. (2019) Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy, Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 56–75. doi: 10.1177/0950017018785616

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wright, E.O. (1985) Classes, London: Verso.

  • Wright, E.O., Costello, C., Hachen, D. and Sprague, J. (1982) The American class structure, American Sociological Review, 47(6): 709–26. doi: 10.2307/2095208

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Steven P. Vallas Northeastern University, USA

Search for other papers by Steven P. Vallas in
Current site
Google Scholar Close
and
Juliet B. Schor Boston College, USA

Search for other papers by Juliet B. Schor in
Current site
Google Scholar Close

s.vallas@northeastern.edu
schorj@bc.edu

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 697 697 697
Full Text Views 25 25 25
PDF Downloads 37 37 37

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Cover Work in the Global Economy
Work in the Global Economy