Part I: Labour market insecurity and youth well-being and health

Publication Date:
30 Jul 2021
Pages:
29–30
Open access
Download PDF
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter
  • View in gallery
  • Figure 2.1:
    View in gallery
    Figure 2.1:

    Moderating effects of macroeconomic indicators on well-being in men

  • Figure 2.2:
    View in gallery
    Figure 2.2:

    Moderating effects of macroeconomic indicators on well-being in women

  • View in gallery
  • Hypothesis 1
    View in gallery
    Hypothesis 1

    The functional equivalency hypothesis. There are two functionally equivalent combinations of conditions (routes) associated with a small negative effect of unemployment on well-being. These are:

  • Hypothesis 2
    View in gallery
    Hypothesis 2

    ALMP hypothesis. It is either the generosity of ALMP (AG) or the human capital investment orientation of ALMP (AI) that will be decisive in releasing potential capacitating effects of these policies on alleviation of the loss of well-being in the unemployed

  • Hypothesis 3
    View in gallery
    Hypothesis 3

    UE hypothesis. The higher the overall level of unemployment in a country, the lower the related stigmatisation and the loss of well-being. However, this connection holds only in the case of the extended family model

  • Figure 4.1:
    View in gallery
    Figure 4.1:

    Estimated effect of unemployment on life satisfaction

  • Figure 4.2:
    View in gallery
    Figure 4.2:

    Outcome dimension (LS), explanatory conditions and chosen crossover points

  • Figure 4.3:
    View in gallery
    Figure 4.3:

    Sufficient routes to two alternatively calibrated outcomes and cases that can be explained by these

Figure 2.1:

Moderating effects of macroeconomic indicators on well-being in men
Figure 2.2:

Moderating effects of macroeconomic indicators on well-being in women
Hypothesis 1

The functional equivalency hypothesis. There are two functionally equivalent combinations of conditions (routes) associated with a small negative effect of unemployment on well-being. These are:
Hypothesis 2

ALMP hypothesis. It is either the generosity of ALMP (AG) or the human capital investment orientation of ALMP (AI) that will be decisive in releasing potential capacitating effects of these policies on alleviation of the loss of well-being in the unemployed
Hypothesis 3

UE hypothesis. The higher the overall level of unemployment in a country, the lower the related stigmatisation and the loss of well-being. However, this connection holds only in the case of the extended family model
Figure 4.1:

Estimated effect of unemployment on life satisfaction
Figure 4.2:

Outcome dimension (LS), explanatory conditions and chosen crossover points
Figure 4.3:

Sufficient routes to two alternatively calibrated outcomes and cases that can be explained by these

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 75 57 4
PDF Downloads 104 79 3

Altmetrics