ONE: Introduction

Authors:
Jennifer Leigh
,
Jennifer Hiscock
,
Anna McConnell
,
Cally Haynes
,
Claudia Caltagirone
,
Marion Kieffer
,
Emily Draper
,
Anna Slater
,
Larissa von Krbek
,
Kristin Hutchins
,
Davita Watkins
, and
Nathalie Busschaert
Publication Date:
31 May 2022
Pages:
1–15
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447362395.ch001
Open access
Download PDF
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter

Introductions commonly set the scene for a book, and let the reader know what they can look forward to, what will be included in the content, what the book is and who it is aimed at. Before starting that more conventional introduction, however, first we want to set out what this book is not. This book is not an account of how hard women and other marginalised groups have it in science. It does not contain victim stories or whistleblowing from women in supramolecular chemistry who have an axe to grind and want to call out all the men who have been mean to them. We should note at this point that in this chapter we do discuss sexual harassment and this may be distressing for those who have experienced it. We recognise that whistleblowing is a courageous act done often by those who have been subjected to trauma, and we respect, support, and thank all those who share their often difficult and traumatic stories. However, we wanted to go about things differently.

Introductions commonly set the scene for a book, and let the reader know what they can look forward to, what will be included in the content, what the book is and who it is aimed at. Before starting that more conventional introduction, however, first we want to set out what this book is not. This book is not an account of how hard women and other marginalised groups have it in science. It does not contain victim stories or whistleblowing from women in supramolecular chemistry who have an axe to grind and want to call out all the men who have been mean to them. We should note at this point that in this chapter we do discuss sexual harassment and this may be distressing for those who have experienced it. We recognise that whistleblowing is a courageous act done often by those who have been subjected to trauma, and we respect, support, and thank all those who share their often difficult and traumatic stories. However, we wanted to go about things differently. A book of victim stories might gain traction, it might be ‘clickbait’ for those who want to read a tell-all about life in science, but it would do nothing for the careers of those who wrote it and those it seeks to help. Confessional books such as that, stories such as those, tend to be shared by women towards the end of their careers, when they have left science, or when they have retired – see, for example, work by Rita Colwell1, Ellen Daniell2, Sue Rosser3–5, and Vivian Gornick6. These stories are important and very much need to be told. However, women at that point in their life have little to lose by calling out sexual harassment, recounting tales of being ignored, overlooked, and disregarded. In contrast, the authors here are all women in their early-to-mid career stages, who are working (with the one exception of our social scientist) to establish themselves as researchers and leaders in their field of supramolecular chemistry. They are women who are committed to changing things, to making things better for themselves and those women who will follow them, and whose time is spent doing and researching science in laboratories and in their discipline. We ‘call in’ the community to support those who are marginalised,7 and share how this might bring about positive change. This is not to say we are whitewashing the very real challenges faced by women and other marginalised genders.* Drawing on the example of Black feminist researchers: ‘To only focus on the strengths, accomplishments and victories does not give sufficient attention to the system of domination’.8(pxii) We want to walk in the footsteps of the women who have walked before us,9 be agents of change, and continue to bring awareness to the idea of gender and other marginalisations within science.

Who this book is for and why it matters

This book is for everyone who works in supramolecular chemistry, chemistry, and science. It is for the university and research administrators, the funders, the reviewers, and all the people who make the decisions that are responsible for marginalising women and others. As the majority of these people are still men, this book is for those men, so that they can change the balance of gender in science.

Why do we need to talk about gender in relation to science? Why do we still need to talk about gender in relation to science? Isn’t this old hat now? Sara Ahmed wrote, ‘it can be deemed more old-fashioned to point out that only white men are speaking at an event than to have only white men speaking at an event’.10(p155) Similarly, is it more old-fashioned to point out that there is a need to talk about the lack of gender balance and diversity than it is to just carry on as we are? To an extent this is true. It can seem old-fashioned and regressive to keep banging on about gender. But there is a need for change. In 2019, the Royal Society of Chemistry wrote that at the current rate of change we would never reach gender parity in the chemical sciences.11 There has been progress since the 1960s when ‘chemistry department heads said as openly as they had in 1940: “we don’t hire women”’.6(p88) By the 1980s in the same department they said: ‘The chemistry department here doesn’t advertise. It’s illegal now, but they still do it that way. Somehow, they consider it a “shame” to advertise. They write to their friends. And of course their friends are men who have only male graduate students’.6(p88) Things have definitely moved on from then; numbers of women undergraduates, postgraduates, and faculty have increased since the 1970s,5 although ‘the cutting edge of science and engineering remain out of the reach of the vast majority if not all women’.5(p49) In 2008, Aviva Brecher looked back over her career and expressed shock about the women starting their scientific careers: ‘it is astonishing that they are asking today the same questions about how to successfully manage and blend careers in science with the demands of motherhood and family life we struggled to solve thirty years ago’.12(p25) However, choices and challenges balancing life are not the only ones that a woman working in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) will encounter.

The struggles faced by women and other marginalised genders are not new, and many of these struggles are based around how their bodies are seen and treated in the world. In 2006, Tarana Burke initiated the #MeToo movement on social media. Its original intention was to empower women with a sense of solidarity and through strength in numbers. In 2017, this hashtag was adopted by Alyssa Milano in response to the allegations of sexual misconduct by Harvey Weinstein. She wrote on Twitter: ‘If all the women who have been sexually harassed or assaulted wrote “Me too” as a status, we might give people a sense of the magnitude of the problem’.13 Women began using it to talk about experiences of sexual assault, including high-profile women across a multitude of sectors. The hashtag trended in over 85 countries. In 2021, the website Everyone’s Invited14 caught the attention of the media in the UK.15–17 A place where women were asked to share testimonials of abuse they had experienced within institutions of education and/or work, dedicated to eradicating rape culture through conversation, the site had attracted 14,000 testimonies by the end of March 2021, and 51,000 by the middle of July 2021.

Women are not generally encouraged to speak out about their experiences. According to Rape Crisis 20% of women have been assaulted since the age of 16,18 but conviction rates are shockingly low when compared to other crimes.19 Dame Vera Baird, Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, said: ‘We have seen a seismic collapse in rape charging and prosecutions’, with only 1.6% of reported rapes resulting in a charge or summons for the perpetrator.20 However, as might be gathered from the response to #MeToo and www.EveryonesInvited.uk, it is likely that even these official statistics underplay the situation. According to the Brennan Centre for Justice, in the US up to 80%21 of rapes may go unreported, and in the UK up to 85%.20 Sexual assault and sexual harassment cover a wide gambit of crimes, including rape and much, much more. In a context where women are routinely blamed for ‘asking for trouble’ or putting themselves into dangerous situations such as walking outside in the dark, wearing clothes that are too revealing, or drinking too much, lived experiences of harassment and abuse are endemic, and this as true for women who work in STEM as in any other field.

Women are used to being blamed, being questioned, having their legitimacy, their choices, and their authority interrogated in many aspects of their day-to-day lives. Many have internalised misogyny, in the same way that many disabled people internalise ableism22 and people of colour internalise racism.23 Since classical times, there has been a tacit acceptance that public spaces belong to men.24 The very suggestion, made by Jenny Jones in the House of Lords, that men should have a curfew as they are responsible for 97% of all violent attacks resulted in ‘a massive misogynistic hissy fit of outrage. Most were completely blind to the ways that women have to constantly adapt their lives in reaction to male violence’.25 Women, on the other hand, belong in the private spaces, the domesticated spaces. And there they should stay. They are wives, mothers, sisters, daughters. Their worth is determined by their relationship to the men around them. Women and feminism have done much to challenge this culture, but at the time of writing the patriarchy and male violence towards women remain a pervading and pervasive truth which impacts how women live their lives.

Women in STEM, women in science, and women in chemistry are still women. When we talk about numbers of women in scientific disciplines, when we talk about neoliberal cultures of overwork and hyperproductivity, when we talk about isolation and the loneliness of women working within environments that are dominated by men, we cannot ignore that these women are still women, whether they have a womb or not. When a woman is choosing whether to work late in the lab, she has to do so with the knowledge that it is not just about a choice to work late. It is a choice to work late in a room or building where there is minimal presence of others (and those who are there are likely to be male). It is about the choice to walk from that building alone, and to make her way home alone, walking, on public transport, or in a car, and then to enter her home, alone. These choices will be mediated by her identity, and whether in addition to being a woman she is trans, neurodivergent, a woman of colour, or has a disability, for example. Each of these intersecting identities present additional risk, additional factors that may balance her choice to work late, or leave while it is still light, or when others are leaving. This train of thought may seem trivial to any man who only has to weigh up the choice of working late or not despite the vast majority of violent attacks being male-on-male violence. However, as events such as those of the week of 15 March 2021 in the UK highlighted,26 together with ongoing campaigns such as #ReclaimThe Street, for a woman they can be a matter of life and death, or at least a life free from the threat of rape or sexual assault (this particular week included International Women’s Day; a highly publicised interview with a former princess revealing mental health issues; the discovery of the body of a white woman murdered in London by a serving Metropolitan Police officer; victim-blaming in the media; disruption of peaceful vigils by the Metropolitan Police; and Mother’s Day). When we look at the history of women in science, and we look at the perspectives on why there is a lack of gender balance, as well as discounting outmoded beliefs that women just are not capable of cutting-edge research,6 we also need to address the context within which women in science operate. If we are to look comprehensively at the experiences of women in science, then we need to foreground their experiences as women.

Women in science

The numbers show that there has been bias and marginalisation of many different groups in science; this is indisputable.5,11,27,28 This is not due to lack of scientific interest by women: ‘women have always been interested in science. The fact is, women have been actively excluded from science’.1(p182) Since Victorian times, attitudes and beliefs that women were inferior to men made it more difficult to pursue a career in science.29 Once thought of as a profession for the ‘sons of educated men’, now it is widely recognised that science needs to be diversified because:

the best of 100 percent of the population will always be better than the best of 50 percent of the population. Once all the talent in our country can compete on a level playing field, decisions about who to hire and who to support can be made on the basis of brains and ability, not gender, ethnicity, or national origin.1(p194)

In order to get the very best and brightest working on the huge problems that face our world today – global warming, global pandemics, hunger, poverty, and health to name a few – then we need to be fishing in a pool that includes everyone. This book goes beyond these numbers that demonstrate so clearly that there is a problem in science. Those numbers have been recorded and reported at least since the 1970s, and yet the pace of change has slowed and stalled:

The percentage of women on the faculty of MIT’s [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] School of Science went from zero in 1963 to 8 percent in 1995 to 19.2 percent in 2014. But since then, the drive toward equality has stalled. There were fourteen women faculty members in MIT’s biology department in 2009 – and there were still fourteen ten years later in 2019. The proportion of women faculty in biology and chemistry actually decreased during that time.1(p75)

Gender equality has been identified as a goal worthy of global challenge by the United Nations.30 The need to address equality diversity and inclusion in science has been foregrounded by the NSA (National Science Academy), UKRI (UK Research & Innovation), and professional bodies, even before the 2020 pandemic and its impact on gender balance.31,32

This book seeks to humanise the experiences of those women in STEM, reaching out with embodied stories to evoke responses as to why this lack of gender balance and diversity matters, why it is important, and what impact it has on those who are affected by it. We are all, as authors, passionate about this topic. Throughout, we keep ‘a strong presence of emotional investment visible’.33(p23) In order to do this, we include images created during and for our research along with vignettes throughout each chapter. The vignettes are fictionalised composite stories that have been written in response to the findings of WISC’s ongoing research (see Chapter Five for the story of WISC and its current projects and Chapter Two for an exploration of the methods and approach used). They are used to highlight the personal stories and lived experiences of women in supramolecular chemistry in a way that does not allow individuals to be scapegoated, blamed, or identified in any way. This is an effort to avoid the repercussions on individuals as a result of ‘whistleblowing’ or complaining.34 None of the stories told in the vignettes are ‘real’, but all are true, and draw on lived experiences.

The stories of women in STEM have been a subject of interest for a long time, from women scientists in the First World War,29 to reminiscences from women looking back at their careers in science in the 1980s.6 This book adds to that literature, and differs from it in two important ways. First, it takes a field-specific approach. While the issues and experiences that we highlight here are common to many women in STEM, STEM is not a monolith: it comprises/represents many different disciplines. Any conclusions drawn from data collected will depend upon the agency collating it and which disciplines are included in that agency’s investigation. Some disciplines and fields have made much more progress towards equality, diversity, and inclusion than others in the last 50 years, and therefore the discrimination faced by women and other marginalised groups is not the same in each discipline. For example, some studies include the physical sciences, others separate out psychology, and yet others include psychology and medicine, which both have a good representation of women. The discrimination faced by women and other marginalised groups is not the same in each discipline. This book focuses in on one field of chemistry – supramolecular chemistry – and the perceptions and experiences of those who work within it (see Figure 1.1, which shows one author’s response to the prompt ‘who are you as a chemist?’).

Figure 1.1:
Figure 1.1:

What is a chemist?

All of the images in this book are the authors’ own.

Second, this book is not written about women in STEM. It is written by and with them. The authors all took part in work that set out to use creative and embodied approaches to capture stories, build community, and identify a toolkit for women who want to progress in the field. The timing of this project coincided with the 2020/21 COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, and as such records the experiences of women scientists as they navigated through life inside and outside laboratories. The authors range in age from their 20s to mid-40s, and represent the range of early, mid, and senior career scientists with and without children. The topics that they discussed and explored led to themes that are included in this book: the reality of being a woman in a male-dominated sphere; the fight for lab space; the pressure and responsibility towards their teams. They represent a diversity of race, ethnicity, religion, nationality, and disability. They include those who chose to leave the chemical sciences and academia in addition to those who chose to remain. This work was supported through WISC, an international network for Women in Supramolecular Chemistry, with the aim to support equality and diversity.

WISC aspires to be an agent of change. It launched in November 2019. Since its launch the network has created a website and resource bank35 (www.womeninsuprachem.com), conducted a survey of the supramolecular community, initiated small-group mentoring, and published a paper outlining the ethos of ‘calling in’ the community and the network’s approach to combining qualitative research methods and expertise in EDI (equality/equity, diversity, and inclusion), together with findings from the first survey of the supramolecular chemistry community in Angewandte Chemie, a leading international chemistry journal,7 and from a second survey on lived experiences through COVID-19 in CHEM.36 The network has set up an international board and advisory board. It has led a series of panel events (in-person pre-COVID and online) in collaboration with MASC (the Royal Society of Chemistry special interest group for Macrocyclic and Supramolecular Chemistry) and virtual MASC (the online, early-career arm of MASC). WISC’s first skills workshop for early-career researchers was originally organised in September 2020, but was postponed to September 2021 in Cagliari.37 The WISC has set up support clusters – groups where individuals can share experiences and support and learn more about supporting others. These include a parenting cluster, a disability, chronic illness, and neurodivergence cluster, and one for first-generation chemists. These clusters are all open to new people joining them – they are not limited to women only, although women have been the primary members to date. WISC is always interested to hear about ideas for new clusters, and from people wanting to be part of WISC and to help out. The network has an inclusive approach, with the majority of resources open to anyone, regardless of gender, location, or career stage. It tries to identify issues that affect women within the community, then create resources that are open to anyone experiencing those issues. A key example of this is the parenting cluster. Caring responsibilities disproportionately fall to women, but parents of any gender are welcome in the cluster because the issues can affect them too. This was demonstrated through the pandemic.36,38 WISC is actively researching into how teams can communicate, collaborate, and be more effective by incorporating creative and reflective processes into teamwork, and it is exploring the particular challenges that face women who are Principal Investigators (PIs) and lead teams, and how these findings might be used within public engagement. WISC is passionate about creating a sense of kinship and community, and spaces where women and those who are marginalised can share their experiences and learn from others.

Those who are involved in running WISC are all early-to-mid career scientists, with support from more senior colleagues. They have all invested time and energy in WISC because they believe that there is work to be done to ensure the retention, progression, and support of women in the field, and because they believe in the ethos WISC has taken to bring about positive change. The two factors that make the work WISC does stand out from the more general efforts to support women in science are their commitments to a field-specific approach that calls in the community, and the inclusion of a reflective, qualitative, social science approach at every step. WISC would like to think that its work might act as a model to those in other fields and disciplines who are keen to address EDI issues, and are happy to talk to and collaborate with others who would be interested to learn more.

Building community

One of WISC’s aims is to build community and create a sense of kinship for women and those who are marginalised. This book is for all those who work in supramolecular chemistry, in chemistry, in science, and who need to know that they are not alone. While academia remains ‘the (stereotypically) masculine and isolated place it was designed to be – a place free from children, romantic relationships, and personal problems and lives’,39(p160) it can be intimidating for women to talk openly about their personal lives. Sue Rosser wrote: ‘No one likes to feel as if they must give up their femininity, motherhood, or another characteristic they view as core to their identity in order to fit into their profession’.4(p78) Things have come a long way since 1988, when Traweek described the laboratory as ‘a man’s world’.3(p46) Women and those from minority backgrounds are still underrepresented, particularly at the more senior levels, making the journey towards full professorship appear daunting. For those who persevere, it can be hard to find success due to conscious, unconscious or systemic bias. It can be isolating as a member of a minority group; ‘storming the tower is a lonely business, as any academic woman who has tried can tell you’.40(p1) Marginalisation in higher education (HE) is often thought to correlate with characteristics of the individual, such as colour, ethnicity, disability, class, and access. In terms of gender, we know that women in academia are disproportionately affected by funding structures, academic culture, research environment, and caring responsibilities. A body of work exists on academic identity and women’s lived experiences as they negotiate and resist structural inequalities. However, the voices of women in STEM and their embodied stories are largely absent.

In WISC we found a group willing to trust, to innovate, and to step out of their disciplinary norms and play with qualitative research and new ideas. In doing so, the group found support and connection to understand their experiences at work, with their research teams, and to reflect on how they wanted to progress in their careers. There is an assumption within science (particularly supramolecular chemistry) that corresponding authors and team leaders are men, or women without caring responsibilities. During lockdown in the UK, one supramolecular chemist with a young child received a reviewer comment on a journal article: ‘this team likely has time on their hands in the light of current in-lab restrictions’. She told us that while reading it she was literally trying to keep her daughter out of the cat food: “I feel physically sick at the thought of work right now.” This book is not a collection of victim stories, it does not call out, name, and shame the senior men and institutions that perpetuate a culture of discrimination and harassment towards women. Instead it highlights the importance of community and how scientists can utilise social science methodologies for processing, sharing, and learning from experiences.

This book is uniquely positioned to set out the context for women and other marginalised groups in the field, and to share the invisible, embodied, emotional experiences of women in supramolecular chemistry, particularly as they navigate through and beyond Covid-19 and its effects on the higher education sector. It brings together findings from WISC and reflective narratives on the embodied and emotional experiences of academic work in a field dominated by white men. It is a significant contribution to work on academic identity and gender because it captures the embodied voices of women in STEM.

What’s in the book

In Chapter Two we explain the reasoning and approach behind embedding a qualitative approach into our research, and why we believe it is necessary to use methods such as collaborative autoethnography and Embodied Inquiry. We discuss the meanings of these terms, explain what this equates to in terms of doing research, and how we set about creating the fictional vignettes that are included in the next six chapters.

Chapter Three explores the process of building an academic identity in STEM as a woman, and what is valued and rewarded in an academic career. We consider the idea of wellbeing and overwork in academia, and take a close look at how choices around motherhood can impact a scientific career. Finally, we look at options for those who choose to leave academia.

Chapter Four examines the challenges faced by women and other marginalised groups, and the lack of diversity in STEM as a whole. We consider the discrimination that results from sexism, racism, and ableism, some of the institutional drivers that are being put in place to address this, and how community and mentoring can play a part to offset the isolation and negative career impacts of being marginalised.

Chapter Five sets out the history of WISC, its ethos of ‘calling in’ and not ‘calling out’ the supramolecular community. We share the projects and initiatives we have worked on to date, including our first survey, our mentoring programme, support clusters, skills workshop, and ongoing research. We also share the publications that have resulted from our work so far, and our aspirations and plans for the future.

Chapter Six draws strongly on the collaborative autoethnography project to create stories from STEM which demonstrate a reflection of life as women principal investigators. The themes that resonated with us as a group were around overwork, self-care and community, femininity, and the emotional toll of working through this period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Finally, Chapter Seven looks towards the future. We share findings from WISC’s second survey, and show how we triangulated the data from that survey together with data from the collaborative autoethnography and the reflective work with individual research groups, to throw light on experiences of researchers and research leaders through COVID-19. We discuss the importance of community in creating change, and how WISC’s work fits into wider, intersectional feminist goals. We end by thinking of the inclusive future that we would like to help create in science.

*

Our use of ‘women’ includes trans women. We use ‘marginalised genders’ to also include non-binary people and trans men.

Figure 1.1:

What is a chemist?
  • 1.

    R. Colwell and S. Bertsch McGrayne, A lab of one’s own: One woman’s personal journey through sexism in science, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    E. Daniell, Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful women scientists, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006.

  • 3.

    S. Rosser, The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed, Routledge, New York, 2004.

  • 4.

    S. Rosser, Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science, New York University Press, New York, 2012.

  • 5.

    S. Rosser, Academic women in STEM faculty, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2017.

  • 6.

    V. Gornick, Women in science: Then and now, The Feminist Press, New York, NY, 25th Anniversary, 2009.

  • 7.

    C. Caltagirone, E. Draper, C. Haynes, M. Hardie, J. Hiscock, K. Jolliffe, M. Kieffer, A. McConnell and J. Leigh, An area specific, international community-led approach to understanding and addressing EDI issues within supramolecular chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60, 11572–11579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    L. Mullings, On our own terms: Race, class, and gender in the lives of African American women, Routledge, New York, 1997.

  • 9.

    E. Monosson, Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008.

  • 10.

    S. Ahmed, Living a feminist life, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2017.

  • 11.

    RSC, Breaking the barriers: Women’s retention and progression in the chemical sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2019.

  • 12.

    A. Brecher, Balancing family and career demands with 20/20 hindsight, in Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, ed E. Monosson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008, pp 25–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    E. Chuck, Alyssa Milano promotes hashtag that becomes anti-harassment rallying cry, NBC News, 2017, https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/sexual-misconduct/metoo-hashtag-becomes-anti-sexual-harassment-assault-rallying-cry-n810986 (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 14.

    Everyones Invited, Everyone’s Invited, www.everyonesinvited.uk (accessed 15 July 2021).

  • 15.

    R. Younger, Everyone’s Invited names almost 3,000 schools following claims of sexual assault, rape and harassment, ITV News, 9 June 2021, https://www.itv.com/news/2021-06-09/everyones-invited-names-almost-3000-schools-following-claims-of-sexual-assault-rape-and-harassment (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    S. Osbourne, Everyone’s Invited: What is the website with 10,000 sexual abuse complaints and will there be an inquiry? 30 March 2021. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/everyones-invited-school-sexual-abuse-what-b1824332.html (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 17.

    S. Elliott, 30 schools in Edinburgh and Lothians named in Everyone’s Invited sexual assault testimonies, Edinburgh Evening News, 12 July 2021, https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/education/30-schools-in-edinburgh-and-lothians-named-in-everyones-invited-sexual-assault-testimonies-3303141 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Rape Crisis England & Wales: Statistics on sexual violence, https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/about-sexual-violence/statistics-sexual-violence/ (accessed 15 July 2021).

  • 19.

    UK. Parliament, Serious fall in rape prosecutions examined with Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/83/home-affairs-committee/news/156062/serious-fall-in-rape-prosecutions-examined-with-victims-commissioner-for-england-and-wales/ (accessed 20 July 2021).

  • 20.

    C. Barr and A. Topping, Fewer than one in 60 rape cases lead to charge in England and Wales, The Guardian, 23 May 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/may/23/fewer-than-one-in-60-cases-lead-to-charge-in-england-and-wales (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Cameron Kimble, Sexual assault remains dramatically underreported, Brennan Centre for Justice, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/sexual-assault-remains-dramatically-underreported (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 22.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, UCL Press, London, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    S. Ahmed, On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2012.

  • 24.

    M. Beard, Women & power: A manifesto, Profile Books, London, 2017.

  • 25.

    Jenny Jones, The outrage at my suggestion of a 6pm curfew for men exposes a depressing reality about violence against women, iNews, 15 March 2021, https://inews.co.uk/opinion/the-outrage-at-my-suggestion-of-a-6pm-curfew-for-men-exposes-a-depressing-reality-about-violence-against-women-914567 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    G. MacInes, I went to Sarah Everard’s vigil to pay my respects to a woman who could have been any of us, Global Citizen, 19 March 2021, https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/sarah-everard-vigil-clapham-gender-violence-uk/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 27.

    RSC, Diversity landscape of the chemical sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2018.

  • 28.

    W. Joice and A. Tetlow, Disability STEM data for students and academic staff in higher education 2007/08 to 2018/19, Royal Society, London, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    P. Fara, A lab of one’s own: Science and suffrage in the first world war, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.

  • 30.

    United Nations: Sustainable development goals, www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed 15 July 2021).

  • 32.

    B.P. Gabster, K. van Daalen, R. Dhatt and M. Barry, Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic, Lancet (London, England), 2020, 395, 1968–1970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    V. Evans-Winters, Black feminism in qualitative inquiry, Routledge, Abingdon, 2019.

  • 34.

    S. Ahmed, Complaint!, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2021.

  • 35.

    WISC, The International Women in Supramolecular Chemistry Network.

  • 36.

    J.S. Leigh, J.R. Hiscock, S. Koops, A.J. McConnell, C.J.E. Haynes, C. Caltagirone, M. Kieffer, E.R. Draper, A.G. Slater, K.M. Hutchins, D. Watkins, N. Busschaert, L.K.S. von Krbek, K.A. Jolliffe and M.J. Hardie, Managing research throughout COVID-19: Lived experiences of the supramolecular chemistry community managing their research through COVID-19, CHEM, 2022, 8(2), 299–311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    WISC, WISC 1st Skills Workshop, 2021, https://d017147e-00c2-4e9e-88fd-affbf75f13ce.filesusr.com/ugd/e3c05f_ef7a72f4eaeb4dc58f83e3c84dee4f36.pdf (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    J. Blanden, C. Crawford, L. Fumagalli and B. Rabe, School closures and parents’ mental health, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    M. Barnes, You can’t un-see colour, a PhD, a divorce, and the Wizard of Oz, in Feminism and intersectionality in academia: Women’s narratives and experiences in higher education, ed S. Shelton, J. Flynn and T. Grosland, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2018, pp 155–166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    S. Stiver Lie and V. O’Leary, Storming the tower: Women in the academic world, Kogan Page, London, 1990.

  • 1.

    S. Rosser, Feminism within the science and health care professions: Overcoming resistance, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988.

  • 2.

    S. Rosser, Academic women in STEM faculty, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2017.

  • 3.

    M.A. Mason and E.M. Ekman, Mothers on the fast track: How a new generation can balance family and careers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    V. Gornick, Women in science: Then and now, The Feminist Press, New York, 25th Anniversary, 2009.

  • 5.

    N. Denzin, The qualitative manifesto, Routledge, Abingdon, 2010.

  • 6.

    J.H.I. Stanfield, The possible restorative justice functions of qualitative research, Interntation Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2006, 19, 673–684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    C. Caltagirone, E. Draper, C. Haynes, M. Hardie, J. Hiscock, K. Jolliffe, M. Kieffer, A. McConnell and J. Leigh, An area specific, international community-led approach to understanding and addressing EDI issues within supramolecular chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60, 11572–11579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    U. Flick, The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, Sage, London, 2018.

  • 9.

    D. Silverman, Interpreting qualitative data, Sage Publications, London, 3rd edn, 2006.

  • 10.

    H. Chang, F. Ngunjiri and K.-A. Hernandez, Collaborative autoethnography, Routledge, Abingdon, 2016.

  • 11.

    R. Kennelly and C. McCormack, Creating more ‘elbow room’ for collaborative reflective practice in the competitive, performance culture of today’s university, Higher Education Research & Development, 2015, 34, 942–956.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    J. Leigh and N. Brown, Embodied inquiry: Research methods, Bloomsbury, London, 2021.

  • 13.

    V. Evans-Winters, Black feminism in qualitative inquiry, Routledge, Abingdon, 2019.

  • 14.

    S. Wilson, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, 2008.

  • 15.

    H. Kara, Research ethics in the real world: Euro-Western and indigenous perspectives, Policy Press, Bristol, 2018.

  • 16.

    A. Clark and P. Moss, Listening to young children: The mosaic approach, National Children’s Bureau for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, London, 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    A. Clark and P. Moss, Spaces to play more listening to young children using the mosaic approach, National Children’s Bureau, London, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    H. Kara, Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide, Policy Press, Bristol, 2015.

  • 19.

    P. Leavy, Method meets art: Arts-based research practice, Guildford, New York, 2nd edn, 2015.

  • 20.

    R. Coleman, Glitterworlds: The future politics of a ubiquitous thing, Goldsmiths Press, London, 2020.

  • 21.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, in Theory and method in higher education research, eds J. Huisman and M. Tight, Emerald, Bingley, 2018, vol 4.

  • 22.

    V. Braun and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3, 77–101.

  • 23.

    M. MacLure, Discourse in educational and social research, Open University Press, Buckingham, 2003.

  • 24.

    P. Leavy, Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels, Routledge, Abingdon, 2016.

  • 25.

    P. Clough, Narratives and fictions in educational research, Open University Press, Maidenhead, 2002.

  • 26.

    B. Bjørkelo, Workplace bullying after whistleblowing: future research and implications, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2013, 28, 306–323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    R. Philips and H. Kara, Creative writing for social research: A practical guide, Bristol University Press, Bristol, 2021.

  • 28.

    M. Hammersly, Ethnography: Problems and prospects, Ethnography and Education, 2006, 1, 3–14.

  • 29.

    S. Pink, Doing sensory ethnography, Sage, London, 2009.

  • 30.

    A. Bochner and C. Ellis, Evocative autoethnography: Writing lives and telling stories, Routledge, London, 2016.

  • 31.

    A. Bleakley, From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity, Studies in Higher Education, 1999, 24, 315–330.

  • 32.

    J. Leigh and R. Bailey, Reflection, reflective practice and embodied reflective practice, Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 2013, 8(3), 160–171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    J. Leigh, Conversations on embodiment across higher education: Teaching, practice and research, Routledge, Abingdon, 2018.

  • 34.

    C. Ellis, Fighting back or moving on: An autoethnographic response to critics, International Review of Qualitative Research, 2009, 2, 371–378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    I. Wellard, Researching embodied sport: Exploring movement cultures, Routledge, London, 2015.

  • 36.

    R. Merton, On social structure and science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1996.

  • 37.

    L. Dubois Baber, Color-blind liberalism in postsecondary STEM education, in Diversifying STEM: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race and gender, ed E. McGee and W. Robinson, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2020, pp 19–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    S.A. Southerland, G.M. Sinatra and M.R. Matthews, Belief, knowledge, and science education, Educational Psychology Review, 2001, 13, 325–351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    B. Latour, Pandora’s hope: Essays on the realities of science studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

  • 40.

    K. Barad, Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    T. Shin, Real-life examples of discriminating artificial intelligence, https://towardsdatascience.com/real-life-examples-of-discriminating-artificial-intelligence-cae395a90070 (accessed 1 November 2021).

  • 42.

    G.S. Aikenhead and M. Ogawa, Indigenous knowledge and science revisited, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2007, 2, 539–620.

  • 43.

    BWoY, The British wheel of yoga, 2010, http://www.bwy.org.uk/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 44.

    International Somatic Movement Educators and Therapists Association, http://www.ismeta.org/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 45.

    B.K. Iyengar, Light on yoga, HarperCollins, London, 1966.

  • 46.

    D. Swenson, Ashtanga yoga ‘The practice manual ’, Ashtanga Yoga Productions, Houaton, TX, 1999.

  • 47.

    S.K. Pattabhi Jois, Yoga Mala, North Point Press, New York, 1999.

  • 48.

    J. Adler, Offering from the conscious body: The discipline of authentic movement, Inner Traditions, Rochester, VT, 2002.

  • 49.

    L. Hartley, Wisdom of the body moving, North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, CA, 1989.

  • 50.

    L. Hartley, Somatic psychology: Body, mind and meaning, Whurr Publishers, London, 2004.

  • 51.

    J. Leigh, Embodiment and authenticity, in Lived experiences of ableism in academia: Strategies for inclusion in higher education, ed N. Brown, Policy Press, Bristol, 2021, pp 53–72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    J. Leigh, Exploring multiple identities: An embodied perspective on academic development and higher education research, Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices, 2019, 11(1), 99–114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    J. Leigh, Exploring multiple identities: An embodied perspective on academic development and higher education research, Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices, 2019, 11(1), 99–114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    J. Leigh, An embodied approach in a cognitive discipline, in Educational futures and fractures, Palgrave, London, 2019, pp 221–248.

  • 55.

    J. Leigh, What would a longitudinal rhythmanalysis of a qualitative researcher’s life look like? in Temporality in qualitative inquiry: Theory, methods, and practices, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, pp 72–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    H. Lefevbre, Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life, Continuum, London, 2004.

  • 57.

    D. Lyon, What is rhythmanalysis?, Bloomsbury, London, 2019.

  • 58.

    J. Leigh, Exploring multiple identities: An embodied perspective on academic development and higher education research, Journal of Dance and Somatic Practices, 2019, 11(1), 99–114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    J. Leigh and N. Brown, Internalised ableism: Of the political and the personal, in Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, ed N. Brown and J. Leigh, UCL Press, London, 2020, pp 164–181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Withdrawal: T. Hudlicky, ‘Organic synthesis – Where now?’ Is thirty years old. A reflection on the current state of affair, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/anie.202006717?af=R (accessed 21 July 2021).

  • 61.

    Withdrawal: T. Hudlicky, ‘Organic synthesis – Where now?’ Is thirty years old. A reflection on the current state of affair.

  • 62.

    N. Compton, T. Kueckmann, F. MaaB, X. Su, S. Tobey and N. Weickgennannt, Angewandte Chemie’s redefined international advisory board: Strengthening connections between the journal and its community, Angewandte Chemie, 2021, 60(33), 17752–17754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    C.A. Urbina-Blanco, S.Z. Jilani, I.R. Speight, M.J. Bojdys, T. Friščić, J.F. Stoddart, T.L. Nelson, J. Mack, R.A.S. Robinson, E.A. Waddell, J.L. Lutkenhaus, M. Godfrey, M.I. Abboud, S.O. Aderinto, D. Aderohunmu, L. Bibič, J. Borges, V.M. Dong, L. Ferrins, F.M. Fung, T. John, F.P.L. Lim, S.L. Masters, D. Mambwe, P. Thordarson, M.-M. Titirici, G.D. Tormet-González, M.M. Unterlass, A. Wadle, V.W.-W. Yam and Y.-W. Yang, A diverse view of science to catalyse change, Nature Chemistry, 2020, 12, 773–776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    S.C.L. Kamerlin and P. Wittung-Stafshede, Female faculty: Why so few and why care?, Chemistry: A European Journal, 2020, 26, 8319–8323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    C.J. Burrows, J. Huang, S. Wang, H.J. Kim, G.J. Meyer, K. Schanze, T.R. Lee, J.L. Lutkenhaus, D. Kaplan, C. Jones, C. Bertozzi, L. Kiessling, M.B. Mulcahy, C.W. Lindsley, M.G. Finn, J.D. Blum, P. Kamat, W. Choi, S. Snyder, C.C. Aldrich, S. Rowan, B. Liu, D. Liotta, P.S. Weiss, D. Zhang, K.N. Ganesh, H.A. Atwater, J.J. Gooding, D.T. Allen, C.A. Voigt, J. Sweedler, A. Schepartz, V. Rotello, S. Lecommandoux, S.J. Sturla, S. Hammes-Schiffer, J. Buriak, J.W. Steed, H. Wu, J. Zimmerman, B. Brooks, P. Savage, W. Tolman, T.F. Hofmann, J.F. Brennecke, T.A. Holme, K.M. Merz, G. Scuseria, W. Jorgensen, G.I. Georg, S. Wang, P. Proteau, J.R. Yates, P. Stang, G.C. Walker, M. Hillmyer, L.S. Taylor, T.W. Odom, E. Carreira, K. Rossen, P. Chirik, S.J. Miller, J.-E. Shea, A. McCoy, M. Zanni, G. Hartland, G. Scholes, J.A. Loo, J. Milne, S.B. Tegen, D.T. Kulp and J. Laskin, Confronting racism in chemistry journals, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12, 28925–28927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    S.E. Reisman, R. Sarpong, M.S. Sigman and T.P. Yoon, Organic chemistry: A call to action for diversity and inclusion, Organic Letters, 2020, 22, 6223–6228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    J. Stockard, J. Greene, G. Richmond and P. Lewis, Is the gender climate in chemistry still chilly? Changes in the last decade and the long-term impact of COACh-sponsored workshops, Journal of Chemical Education, 2018, 95, 1492–1499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, UCL Press, London, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    N. Brown, Ed, Lived experiences of ableism in academia: Strategies for inclusion in higher education, Policy Press, Bristol, 2021.

  • 70.

    K. Sutherland, Constructions of success in academia: An early career perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 2017, 42, 743–759.

  • 71.

    A. Slater, C. Caltagirone, E. Draper, N. Busschaert, K. Hutchins and L. Leigh, J. Pregnancy in the lab, Nat Rev Chem, 2022,6, 163–164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    R. Colwell and S. Bertsch McGrayne, A lab of one’s own: One woman’s personal journey through sexism in science, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    S. Rosser, Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science, New York University Press, New York, 2012.

  • 74.

    E. Daniell, Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful women scientists, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006.

  • 75.

    A. McConnell, C. Haynes, C. Caltagirone and J. Hiscock, Editorial for the supramolecular chemistry: Young talents and their mentors special collection, Chempluschem, 2020, 85, 2544–2545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    A.K. Scaffidi and J.E. Berman, A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment, Higher Education, 2011, 62, 685–698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    B.M. Cossairt, J.L. Dempsey and E.R. Young, The Chemistry Women Mentorship Network (ChemWMN): A tool for creating critical mass in academic chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, 2019, 58, 12493–12496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    H. Laube, Building connections across differences: Faculty mentoring as institutional change, in Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy: Higher education, gender and intersectionality, ed G. Crimmins, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019, pp 95–113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    K. Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, 1989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    J.S. Leigh, J.R. Hiscock, S. Koops, A.J. McConnell, C.J.E. Haynes, C. Caltagirone, M. Kieffer, A.G. Slater, E.R. Draper, K.M. Hutchins, D. Watkins, N. Busschaert, L.K.S. von Krbek, K.A. Jolliffe and M.J. Hardie, Lived experiences of the supramolecular chemistry community managing their research through COVID-19, CHEM, 2022, 8, 299–311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    L. Back, Academic diary: Or why higher education still matters, Goldsmiths Press, London, 2016.

  • 2.

    J. Fanghanel, Being an academic, Routledge, Abingdon, 2012.

  • 3.

    F. Prondzynski, A university blog: A diary of life and strategy inside and outside the university, 2014, https://universitydiary.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/do-we-recognise-good-teaching-in-our-universities/#comment-30053 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    F. Vostal, Accelerating academia: The changing structure of academic time, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2016.

  • 5.

    H. Rosa, Full speed burnout? From the pleasures of the motorcycle to the bleakness of the treadmill: The dual face of social acceleration, International Journal of Motorcycle Studies, 2010, 6(1), np.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    R. Gill, Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia, in Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed R. Flood and R. Gill, Routledge, London, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    S. Acker and C. Armenti, Sleepless in academia, Gender and Education, 2004, 16, 3–24.

  • 8.

    J. Williams, Consuming higher education: Why education can’t be bought, Bloomsbury, London, 2013.

  • 9.

    P. Bourdieu, On television, The New Press, New York, 1998.

  • 10.

    R. Murray and D. Mifsud, The positioning and making of female professors, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019.

  • 11.

    J. Malcolm and M. Zukas, Making a mess of academic work: experience, purpose and identity, Teaching in Higher Education, 2009, 14, 495–506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    J. Leigh, An embodied approach in a cognitive discipline, in Educational futures and fractures, Palgrave, London, 2019.

  • 13.

    P. Boynton, Being well in academia, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020.

  • 14.

    B. Clark and A. Sousa, How to be a happy academic, Sage, London, 2018.

  • 15.

    K. Kelsky, The professor is in, Three Rivers Press, New York, 2015.

  • 16.

    UK National Account of Wellbeing, What is wellbeing, 2012, http://www.nationalaccountsofwellbeing.org/learn/what-is-well-being.html (accessed 22 June 2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    R. Bailey, Wellbeing, happiness and education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2009, 30, 795–802.

  • 18.

    J. Griffin, Well-being, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996.

  • 19.

    R. Barrow, Happiness, Martin Robinson, Oxford, 1980.

  • 20.

    D. Parfit, Reasons and persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

  • 21.

    M. Nussbaum, Women and human development: The capabilities approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.

  • 22.

    A. Sen, Commodities and capabilities, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1999.

  • 23.

    R. Dodge, A. Daly, J. Huyton and L. Sanders, The challenge of defining wellbeing, International Journal of Wellbeing, 2012, 2, 222–235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    K. W. Brown and R. Ryan, The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84, 822–848.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    J. Adler, Offering from the conscious body: The discipline of authentic movement, Inner Traditions, Rochester, VT, 2002.

  • 26.

    J. Bacon, Authentic movement as well-being practice, in Oxford handbook for dance and well-being, ed V. Karkou, S. Lycouris and S. Oliver, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    S. Stiver Lie and V. O’Leary, Storming the tower: Women in the academic world, Kogan Page, London, 1990.

  • 28.

    G. Crimmins, A structural account of inequality in the international academy: Why resistance to sexism remains urgent and necessary, in Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy: Higher education, gender and intersectionality, ed G. Crimmins, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019, pp 3–16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    C. Mazak, Babies taught me how to ‘do’ academia: Crafting a career in an institution that was not built for mothers, in The positioning and making of female professors: Pushing career advancement open, ed R. Murray and D. Mifsud, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019, pp 75–88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    E. Yarrow, The power of networks in the gendered academy, in Women thriving in academia, ed M. Mahat, Emerald, Bingley, 2021, pp 89–108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    S. Rosser, Academic women in STEM faculty, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2017.

  • 32.

    K. Powell, The parenting penalties faced by scientist mothers, Nature, 20 July 2021, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01993-x?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20210722&utm_source=nature_etoc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210722&sap-outbound-id=45211DAC4F7B6D10B49010EEB1374001DB14AEE2 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    E. Evans, Fitting in, in Mama PhD: Women write about motherhood and academic life, ed E. Evans and C. Grant, Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJ, 2018, pp 49–54.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    E. Evans and C. Grant, Mama PhD: Women write about motherhood and academic life, Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, NJ, 2008.

  • 35.

    S.A. Shelton, J.E. Flynn and T.J. Grosland, Eds, Feminism and intersectionality in academia: Women’s narratives and experiences in higher education, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    P. Agarwal, (M)otherhood: On the choices of being a woman, Canongate Books, Edinburgh, 2021.

  • 37.

    M.A. Mason and E.M. Ekman, Mothers on the fast track: How a new generation can balance family and careers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    A. Douglass, Three sides of the balance, in Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, ed E. Monosson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    S. Ahmed, Living a feminist life, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2017.

  • 40.

    V. Gornick, Women in science: Then and now, The Feminist Press, New York, 25th Anniversary, 2009.

  • 41.

    C. Seroogy, Reflections of a female scientist with outside interests, in Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, ed E. Monosson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    S. Rosser, Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science, New York University Press, New York, 2012.

  • 43.

    S. Rosser, The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed, Routledge, New York, 2004.

  • 44.

    R. Colwell and S. Bertsch McGrayne, A lab of one’s own: One woman’s personal journey through sexism in science, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    A. Oakley, From here to maternity: Becoming a mother, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1981.

  • 46.

    A. Brecher, Balancing family and career demands with 20/20 hindsight, in Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, ed E. Monosson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008, pp 25–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    A. P. Abola, Finding my way back to the bench, in Motherhood, the elephant in the laboratory: Women scientists speak out, ed E. Monosson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2008, pp 125–129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    T. Estermann, E. Bennetot Pruvot, V. Kupriyanova and H. Stoyanova, The impact of the Covid-19 crisis on university funding in Europe: Lessons learnt from the 2008 global financial crisis, European University Association, Geneva, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Anon, ‘I have been cowed into silence’: An academic speaks out against redundancy, 2020, https://universitybusiness.co.uk/comment/covid-19-redundancies-in-higher-education-an-academic-speaks-out/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 50.

    J. Butler and G. Yancy, Mourning is a political act amid the pandemic and its disparities, 2020, https://discoversociety.org/2020/04/10/covid-19-what-it-means-to-think-violently/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    I. Dougall, M. Weick and M. Vasiljevic, Inside UK universities: Staff mental health and wellbeing during the coronavirus pandemic, Durham University, Durham, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    C. Flaherty, Inside higher education, www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/21/early-journal-submission-data-suggest-covid-19-tanking-womens-research-productivity (accessed 10 November 2020).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    J.S. Leigh, J.R. Hiscock, S. Koops, A.J. McConnell, C.J.E. Haynes, C. Caltagirone, M. Kieffer, A.G. Slater, E.R. Draper, K.M. Hutchins, D. Watkins, N. Busschaert, L.K.S. von Krbek, K.A. Jolliffe and M.J. Hardie, Lived experiences of the supramolecular chemistry community managing their research through COVID-19, CHEM, 2022, 8, 299–311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    J. Gans, Joshua Gans, 2020, https://www.joshuagans.com/economics-in-the-age-of-covid19 (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 55.

    J. Blanden, C. Crawford, L. Fumagalli and B. Rabe, School closures and parents’ mental health, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    B.P. Gabster, K. van Daalen, R. Dhatt and M. Barry, Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic, Lancet (London, England), 2020, 395, 1968–1970.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    A. O’Reilly and F.J. Green, Eds, Mothers, mothering, and COVID-19: Dispatches from a pandemic, Demeter, Bradford, Ontario, 2021.

  • 58.

    K. ‘Fire’ Kovarovic, M. Dixon, K. Hall and N. Westmarland, The impact of Covid-19 on mothers working in UK higher education institutions, Durham University, Durham, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    K. Kramer, Chemistry World, 2020, https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/uk-chemistry-pipeline-loses-almost-all-of-its-black-asian-and-other-ethnic-minority-chemists-after-undergraduate-studies/4012258.article#/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    L. Svinth, Leaky pipeline – to be or not to be a useful metaphor in understanding why women to a disproportional degree exit from scientific careers, The Danish University of Education, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Leaky-pipeline-”-–-to-be-or-not-to-be-a-useful-in-a-Svinth/866433f8414924ac699733dcf1047700d3818c39 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    B. Cornell, PhD students and their careers, HEPI, London, 2021.

  • 62.

    RSC, Breaking the barriers: Women’s retention and progression in the chemical sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2019.

  • 63.

    E. Daniell, Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful women scientists, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006.

  • 64.

    D. Kalekin-Fishman, Mis-making an academic career: Power, discipline, structures, and practices, in The positioning and making of female professors: Pushing career advancement open, ed R. Murray and D. Mifsud, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019, pp 177–200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    I. Oluo, So you want to talk about race, Hatchett Press Group, New York, 2020.

  • 2.

    R. Eddo-Lodge, Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race, Bloomsbury, London, 2017.

  • 3.

    MaNishtana, Thoughts from a unicorn: 100% Black. 100% Jewish. 0% safe., Multikosheral Press, New York, 2012.

  • 4.

    L. Saad, Me and white supremacy: How to recognise your privilege, combat racism and change the world, Quercus, London, 2020.

  • 5.

    A. Lorde, The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house, Penguin Random House, Milton Keynes, 2017.

  • 6.

    S. Ahmed, On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2012.

  • 7.

    S. Fryberg and E. Martinez, Eds, The truly diverse faculty: New dialogues in American higher education, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    W.H. McGee and E.O. Robinson, Eds, Diversifying STEM: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race and gender, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    W.H. Robinson, E.O. McGee, L.C. Bentley, S.L. Houston and P.K. Botchway, Addressing negative racial and gendered experiences that discourage academic careers in engineering, Computing in Science & Engineering, 2016, 18(2), 29–39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    B. Yoder, Engineering by the numbers, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2015.

  • 11.

    National Science Foundation, https://nsf.gov/statistics/reports.cfm (accessed 1 November 2021).

  • 12.

    R. Merton, On social structure and science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1996.

  • 13.

    L. Dubois Baber, Color-blind liberalism in postsecondary STEM education, in Diversifying STEM: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race and gender, ed E. McGee and W. Robinson, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2020, pp 19–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    V. Gornick, Women in science: Then and now, The Feminist Press, New York, 25th Anniversary, 2009.

  • 15.

    HESA, Academic staff by ethnicity and occupation 2019/2020, www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/staff/working-in-he/characteristics#acempfunchar (accessed 2 July 2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    S. Coughlan, Only 1% of UK university professors are black, BBC, 19 January 2021, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-55723120 (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    A. Vaughan, Only 10 senior Black researchers awarded UK science funding last year, www.newscientist.com/article/2262849-only-10-senior-black-researchers-awarded-uk-science-funding-last-year/ (accessed 2 July 2021).

  • 19.

    A. Prasad, Why are there still so few Black scientists in the UK, The Observer, 10 April 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/apr/10/why-are-there-still-so-few-black-scientists-in-the-uk (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    M. Makgoba, Black scientists matter, Science (80-), 2020, 369, 884.

  • 21.

    K. Laland, Racism in academia, and why the ‘little things’ matter, Nature, 2020, 584, 653–654.

  • 22.

    T. Heffernan, Sexism, racism, prejudice, and bias: A literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021, 47(1), 144–154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    L. Ackerman-Biegasiewicz, D. Rias-Rotondo and D. Biegasiewicz, Organic chemistry: A retrosynthetic approach to a diverse field, ACS Central Science, 2020, 6, 1845–1850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    B. Menon, The missing colours of chemistry, Nature Chemistry, 2021, 13, 101–106.

  • 25.

    S.E. Reisman, R. Sarpong, M.S. Sigman and T.P. Yoon, Organic chemistry: A call to action for diversity and inclusion, Organic Letters, 2020, 22, 6223–6228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    C.A. Urbina-Blanco, S.Z. Jilani, I.R. Speight, M.J. Bojdys, T. Friščić, J.F. Stoddart, T.L. Nelson, J. Mack, R.A.S. Robinson, E.A. Waddell, J.L. Lutkenhaus, M. Godfrey, M.I. Abboud, S.O. Aderinto, D. Aderohunmu, L. Bibič, J. Borges, V.M. Dong, L. Ferrins, F.M. Fung, T. John, F.P.L. Lim, S. L. Masters, D. Mambwe, P. Thordarson, M.-M. Titirici, G.D. Tormet-González, M.M. Unterlass, A. Wadle, V.W.-W. Yam and Y.-W. Yang, A diverse view of science to catalyse change, Nature Chemistry, 2020, 12, 773–776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    RSC, Diversity landscape of the chemical sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2018.

  • 28.

    C.J. Burrows, J. Huang, S. Wang, H.J. Kim, G.J. Meyer, K. Schanze, T.R. Lee, J.L. Lutkenhaus, D. Kaplan, C. Jones, C. Bertozzi, L. Kiessling, M.B. Mulcahy, C.W. Lindsley, M.G. Finn, J.D. Blum, P. Kamat, W. Choi, S. Snyder, C.C. Aldrich, S. Rowan, B. Liu, D. Liotta, P.S. Weiss, D. Zhang, K. N. Ganesh, H.A. Atwater, J.J. Gooding, D.T. Allen, C.A. Voigt, J. Sweedler, A. Schepartz, V. Rotello, S. Lecommandoux, S.J. Sturla, S. Hammes-Schiffer, J. Buriak, J.W. Steed, H. Wu, J. Zimmerman, B. Brooks, P. Savage, W. Tolman, T.F. Hofmann, J.F. Brennecke, T.A. Holme, K.M. Merz, G. Scuseria, W. Jorgensen, G.I. Georg, S. Wang, P. Proteau, J.R. Yates, P. Stang, G.C. Walker, M. Hillmyer, L.S. Taylor, T.W. Odom, E. Carreira, K. Rossen, P. Chirik, S.J. Miller, J.-E. Shea, A. McCoy, M. Zanni, G. Hartland, G. Scholes, J.A. Loo, J. Milne, S.B. Tegen, D.T. Kulp and J. Laskin, Confronting racism in chemistry journals, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12, 28925–28927.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    K. Kramer, UK chemistry pipeline loses almost all of its BAME students after undergraduate studies, Chemistry World, 10 August 2020, https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/uk-chemistry-pipeline-loses-almost-all-of-its-black-asian-and-other-ethnic-minority-chemists-after-undergraduate-studies/4012258.article#/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    S. Iyer, D. Stallings and R. Hernandez, National Diversity Equity Workshop 2011: Lowering barriers for all underrepresented chemistry professors, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    K. Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, IL, 139–167, 1989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    M. Cox, in Diversifying STEM: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race and gender2, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2020, pp 53–66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    W. Joice and A. Tetlow, Disability STEM data for students and academic staff in higher education 2007/08 to 2018/19, Royal Society, London, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    GOV UK, UK Government Legislation, 2010, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 35.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: Where are the disabled and ill academics?, Disability & Society, 2018, 33(6), 985–989.

  • 36.

    HESA, Who’s working in HE?, 2020, https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/staff/working-in-he (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 37.

    CRAC, Qualitative research on barriers to progression of disabled scientists, Royal Society, London, 2020.

  • 38.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, UCL Press, London, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    N. Brown, Ed, Lived experiences of ableism in academia: Strategies for inclusion in higher education, Policy Press, Bristol, 2021.

  • 40.

    J. Leigh and N. Brown, Internalised ableism: Of the political and the personal, in Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, ed N. Brown and J. Leigh, UCL Press, London, 2020, pp 164–181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    C. Finesilver, J. Leigh and N. Brown, Invisible disability, unacknowledged diversity, in Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, ed N. Brown and J. Leigh, UCL Press, London, 2020, pp 143–160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    D. Turner, Super humans or scroungers, 2012, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/opinion-articles/articles/superhumans-or-scroungers-disability-past-and-present (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    K. Rummery, From the personal to the political: Ableism, activism and academia, in Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, ed N. Brown and J. Leigh, UCL Press, London, 2020, pp 182–201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    L. Harris, Exploring the effect of disability microaggressions on sense of belonging and participation in college classrooms, School of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    M. Leicester and T. Lovell, Disability voice: Educational experience and disability, Disability & Society, 1997, 12, 111–118.

  • 46.

    A. Mackleden, Being disabled is exhausting, 2019, https://clarissaexplainsfa.com/blog/2019/2/1/being-disabled-is-exhausting (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 47.

    J. Brock, ‘Textbook case’ of disability discrimination in grant applications, Nature Index, January 2021, https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/textbook-case-of-disability-discrimination-in-research-grant-applications (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 48.

    M. Leonardi, J. Bickenbach, T. Ustun, N. Kostanjsek and S. Chatterji, The definition of disability: what is in a name?, Lancet, 2006, 368, 1219–1221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    M. Oliver, The social model of disability: Thirty years on, Disability & Society, 2013, 28, 1024–1026.

  • 50.

    R. Colwell and S. Bertsch McGrayne, A lab of one’s own: One woman’s personal journey through sexism in science, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    M. Shildrick, Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics, Routledge, Abingdon, 1997.

  • 52.

    Aristotle, De natura animalium, De partibus animalium, De generatione animalium, Venetiis: Impressum mandato & expensis nobilis uiri Domini Octauiani Scoti ciuis Modoeti esis per Bartholameum de Zanis de Portesio, Venice.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Galen, de usu partium, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1968.

  • 54.

    P. Fara, A lab of one’s own: Science and suffrage in the first world war, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.

  • 55.

    E. Daniell, Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful women scientists, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2006.

  • 56.

    S. Rosser, Breaking into the lab: Engineering progress for women in science, New York University Press, New York, 2012.

  • 57.

    Y. Xie and K. Shauman, Women in science, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 2003.

  • 58.

    HESA, HE student enrolments by subject area and sex 2014/15 to 2018/19, 2019, https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/sb255/figure-13 (accessed 1 March 2022).

  • 59.

    S. Rosser, Academic women in STEM faculty, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2017.

  • 60.

    Women in STEM, Women in STEM statistics – General outlook for female students, https://www.stemwomen.com/blog/2021/01/women-in-stem-percentages-of-women-in-stem-statistics#:~:text=On%20the%20surface%20this%20would,up%20to%2026%25%20in%202018 (accessed 2 March 2022).

  • 61.

    HESA, HE student enrolments, www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/sb255/figure-13 (accessed 11 November 2020).

  • 62.

    B. Thege, S. Popescue-Willigmann, R. Pioch and S. Badri-Hoher, Eds, Paths to career and success for women in science: Findings from international research, Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    M.L. Dion, J.L. Sumner and S.M. Mitchell, Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields, Political Analysis, 2018, 26, 312–327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    F. Squazzoni, G. Bravo, P. Dondio, M. Farjam, A. Marusic, B. Mehmani, M. Willis, A. Birukou and F. Grimaldo, No evidence of any systemic bias against manuscripts by women in the peer review process of 145 scholarly journals, SocArXiv, 2020, https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/gh4rv/ (accessed 2 March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    K. Hyland and F. Jiang, ‘This work is antithetical to the spirit of research’: An anatomy of harsh peer reviews, Journal for English for Academic Purposes, 2020, 46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    G. Bravo, F. Grimaldo, E. Lopez-Inesta, B. Mehmani and F. Squazzoni, The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals, Nature Communications, 2019, 10, 322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    RSC, Breaking the barriers: Women’s retention and progression in the chemical sciences, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2019.

  • 68.

    RSC, Is publishing in the chemical sciences gender biased? Driving change in research culture, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    NSF, ADVANCE: Organizational Change for Gender Equity in STEM Academic Professions (ADVANCE), www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5383 (accessed 24 July 2021).

  • 70.

    M. Tsouroufli, An examination of the Athena SWAN initiatives in the UK: A critical reflection, in Strategies for resisting sexism in the academy: Higher education, gender and intersectionality, ed G. Crimmins, Palgrave Macmillan, Chaim, 2019, pp 35–54.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71.

    K. Campion and K. Clark, Revitalising race equality policy? Assessing the impact of the Race Equality Charter mark for British universities, Race, Ethnicity and Education, 2021, 25(1), 18–37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    M.A. Mason and E.M. Ekman, Mothers on the fast track: How a new generation can balance family and careers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    S. Rosser, Feminism within the science and health care professions: Overcoming resistance, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988.

  • 74.

    S. Rosser, The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed, Routledge, New York, 2004.

  • 75.

    E. Yarrow, The power of networks in the gendered academy, in Women thriving in academia, ed M. Mahat, Emerald, Bingley, 2021, pp 89–108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76.

    M. Mahat, R. Hardiman, K. Howell and I. Mateo-Babiano, Women leading in academia, in Women thriving in academia, ed M. Mahat, Emerald, Bingley, 2021, pp 51–69.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    R. Murray and D. Mifsud, The positioning and making of female professors, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2019.

  • 78.

    S.A. Shelton, J.E. Flynn and T.J. Grosland, Eds, Feminism and intersectionality in academia: Women’s narratives and experiences in higher education, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    Intrac, Action learning sets: A guide for small and diaspora NGOs, www.intrac.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Action-Learning-Sets-An-INTRAC-guide-1.pdf (accessed 30 June 2021).

  • 1.

    J.M. Lehn, Toward complex matter: Supramolecular chemistry and self-organization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, 99, 4763–4768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Special issue honouring Professor Rocco Ungaro, Supramolecular Chemistry, www.tandfonline.com/toc/gsch20/25/9-11?nav=tocList (accessed 21 July 2021).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    ISMSC, ISMSC prizes, www.chem.byu.edu/alumni/ismsc/awards/ (accessed 21 July 2021).

  • 4.

    J. Leigh, What would a longitudinal rhythmanalysis of a qualitative researcher’s life look like? in Temporality in qualitative inquiry: Theory, methods, and practices, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    J. Leigh and N. Brown, Embodied inquiry: Research methods, Bloomsbury, London, 2021.

  • 6.

    V. Braun and V. Clarke, To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 2021, 13, 201–216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: where are the disabled and ill academics?, Disability & Society, 2018, 33(6), 985–989.

  • 8.

    N. Brown and J. Leigh, Ableism in academia: Theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education, UCL Press, London, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    J. Hiscock and J. Leigh, Exploring perceptions of and supporting dyslexia in teachers in higher education in STEM, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2020, 57, 714–723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    J. Hiscock and J. Leigh, Teaching with and supporting teachers with dyslexia in higher education, in Lived experiences of ableism in academia: Strategies for inclusion in higher education, ed N. Brown, Policy Press, Bristol, 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    NADSN, NADSN, www.nadsn-uk.org (accessed 7 June 2021).

  • 12.

    J. Sarju, Nothing about us without us – Towards genuine inclusion of disabled scientists and science students post pandemic, Chemistry: A European Journal, 2021, 27(41), 10489–10494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    A. Standlee, On the borders of the academy: Challenges and strategies for first-generation graduate students and faculty, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    P. Bourdieu, Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977.

  • 15.

    P. Bourdieu R., The logic of practice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1990.

  • 16.

    C. Caltagirone, E. Draper, C. Haynes, M. Hardie, J. Hiscock, K. Jolliffe, M. Kieffer, A. McConnell and J. Leigh, An area specific, international community-le