PART III: How Comparisons Reshape Competitive Dynamics

Publication Date:
26 Sep 2024
Pages:
193–194
Open access
Download PDF
Rights and permissions Cite this chapter

  • Admiralty (ed) (1906) Fleets. Great Britain and Foreign Countries, London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

  • Albert, M. and Langer, K. (2020) ‘Die Geschichte des Streitkräftevergleichs in der internationalen Politik: Machtvergleiche und die Macht des Vergleichens’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 27(2): 34–64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alfaro-Zaforteza, C. (2019) ‘The age of empire, 1870–1914’, in A. James, C. Alfaro-Zaforteza and M.H. Murfett (eds) European Navies and the Conduct of War, Abingdon, New York, NY: Routledge, pp 130–56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ashmead-Bartlett, E. (1889) Speech, 6 May, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] III/335.

  • Bell, C.M. (2000) The Royal Navy, Seapower and Strategy between the Wars, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Bell, C.M. (2012) Churchill and Sea Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Beresford, C. (1910) Speech, 14 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/15.

  • Bernstein, E. (1914) Speech, 15 May, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 295.

  • Bienaimé, A. (1909) Speech, 6 July, Journal officiel de la République française [Débats Parlementaires/Chambre] 1909.

  • Bönker, D. (2012) Militarism in a Global Age. Naval Ambitions in Germany and the United States before World War I, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bos, C. (1904) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission du budget chargée d’examiner le projet de loi portant fixation du budget général de l’exercice 1905 (Ministère de la marine)’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1904, Annexe No. 1951.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bos, C. (1905) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission du budget chargée d’examiner le projet de loi portant fixation du budget général de l’exercice 1906 (Ministère de la marine)’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1905, Annexe No. 2666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brailsford, H.N. (1918) The War of Steel and Gold. A Study of the Armed Peace (10th edn), London: G. Bell & Sons, Ltd.

  • Brankovic, J., Ringel, L. and Werron, T. (2018) ‘How rankings produce competition: the case of global university rankings’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 47(4): 270–88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Buchanan, T. (1904) Speech, 29 February, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/130.

  • Buzan, B. and Herring, E. (1998) The Arms Dynamic in World Politics, London: Lynne Rienner.

  • Carnegie, A. (1909) The Path to Peace. Reprinted from the London “Times” of June 19, 1909 (slightly revised), New York, NY: The Peace Society of the City of New York.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chamberlain, J. (1893) Speech, 19 December, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/19.

  • Chaumet, C. (1907) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission du budget chargée d’examiner le projet de loi portant fixation du budget général de l’exercice 1908 (Ministère de la marine)’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1907, Annexe No. 1235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chaumet, C. (1908) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission du budget chargée d’examiner le projet de loi portant fixation du budget général de l’exercice 1909 (Ministère de la marine)’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1908, Annexe No. 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chautemps, E. (1891) Speech, 7 December, Journal officiel de la République française [Débats Parlementaires/Chambre], 1891.

  • Chicago Daily Tribune (1899) ‘Comparative Naval Strength of Nations’, Chicago Daily Tribune, 29 January, p 37.

  • Cremer, W. (1893) Speech, 19 December, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/19.

  • Daily News (1898) ‘Judged by results. Lord Salisbury’s foreign policy. Speech by Sir W. Harcourt’, Daily News, 9 May, p 8.

  • De Dompierre d’Hornoy, C. (1889) Speech, 17 June, Journal officiel de la République française [Débats Parlementaires/Chambre] 1889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Delbrück, H. (1899 [1902]) ‘Zukunftskrieg und Zukunftsfriede’, in H. Delbrück (ed) Erinnerungen. Aufsätze und Reden, Berlin: Georg Stilke, pp 498–525.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dülffer, J. (2003) ‘Vom europäischen Mächtesystem zum Weltstaatensystem um die Jahrhundertwende’, in J. Dülffer Im Zeichen der Gewalt. Frieden und Krieg im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert (edited by M. Kröger, U. Soénius and S. Wunsch), Köln: Böhlau, pp 49–65.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Epkenhans, M. (1991) Die wilhelminische Flottenrüstung 1908–1914. Weltmachtstreben, industrieller Fortschritt, soziale Integration, München: Oldenbourg.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Epkenhans, M. (1992) ‘Seemacht = Weltmacht. Alfred T. Mahan und sein Einfluß auf die Seestrategie des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts’, in J. Elvert, J. Jensen and M. Salewski (eds) Kiel, die Deutschen und die See, Stuttgart: Steiner, pp 35–47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Epkenhans, M. (2007) ‘Was a peaceful outcome thinkable? The naval race before 1914’, in H. Afflerbach and D. Stevenson (eds) An Improbable War. The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914, New York, NY: Berghahn, pp 113–29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • EMG (État-Major Général) (1909) ‘Quelle doit être la composition de la flotte en cuirassés, croiseurs-cuirassés, croiseurs protégés, contre-torpilleurs, torpilleurs, sous-marins et autres bâtiments?’, in SHD, MV [Marine Vincennes], BB8 2424/13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goschen, G. (1889) Speech, 07 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] III/333.

  • Grant, J.A. (2007) Rulers, Guns, and Money. The Global Arms Trade in the Age of Imperialism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hahn, O. (1892) Speech, 29 February, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 120.

  • Hamilton, G. (1889) Speech, 07 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] III/333.

  • Haußmann, C. (1891) Speech, 09 March, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 116.

  • HC Deb (1909a) 16 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/2.

  • HC Deb (1909b) 17 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/2.

  • HC Deb (1909c) 18 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/2.

  • Hobson, R. (2002) Imperialism at Sea. Naval Strategic Thought, the Ideology of Sea Power, and the Tirpitz Plan, 1875–1914, Boston, MA: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hollweg, C. (1921) ‘Seemacht’, Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 November, p 1.

  • Hythe, V. (1912) ‘Comparative strength/Comparative tables’, The Naval Annual, (1912): 69–90.

  • Hythe, V. (1913) ‘Comparative strength/Comparative tables’, The Naval Annual, (1913): 76–96.

  • Jaschob, L. (2018) Status im internationalen System. Das Deutsche Reich und sein Statusstreben in Europa 1890–1914, Baden-Baden: Tectum Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Johnson, M. (2011) ‘The liberal party and the navy league in Britain before the great war’, Twentieth Century British History, 22(2): 137–63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keefer, S.A. (2016) The Law of Nations and Britain’s Quest for Naval Security. International Law and Arms Control, 1898–1914, Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kennedy, P.M. (1980) The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914, London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Labouchere, H. (1889) Speech, 06 May, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] III/335.

  • Labouchere, H. (1895) Speech, 18 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/31.

  • Labouchere, H. (1896) Speech, 09 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/38.

  • Lambert, A.D. (2018) Seapower States. Maritime Culture, Continental Empires and the Conflict That Made the Modern World, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Larson, D., Paul, T.V. and Wohlforth, W.C. (2014) ‘Status and world order’, in T.V. Paul, D. Larson and W.C. Wohlforth (eds) Status in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 3–29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Le Moigne, A. (1900) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission de la marine chargée d’examiner: 1° le projet de loi relatif à l’augmentation de la flotte; 2° la proposition de loi de M. Fleury-Ravaria sur le même objet’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1900, Annexe No. 1599.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lebow, R.N. (2008) A Cultural Theory of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lee, A. (1912) Speech, 22 July, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/41.

  • Mackinder, H. (1912) Speech, 22 July, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/41.

  • Mahan, A. (1910) ‘Britain and the world’s peace’, Daily Mail, 31 October, p 8.

  • Marder, A. (1940) The Anatomy of British Sea Power. A History of British Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era, 1880–1905, New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marder, A. (2013) From the Dreadnought to Scapa Flow. The Royal Navy in the Fisher Era 1904–1919 (1st vol), Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing Pen & Sword Books Ltd.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Masson, P. (2002) La Puissance Maritime et Navale au XXe Siècle, Paris: Le Grand livre du mois.

  • Maurer, J.H. (2021) ‘David Lloyd George and the American naval challenge: Great Britain and the Washington Conference’, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 32(2): 310–29.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCranie, K.D. (2021) Mahan, Corbett, and the Foundations of Naval Strategic Thought, La Vergne, TN: Naval Institute Press.

  • Middlemore, J. (1912) Speech, 24 July, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/41.

  • Morgan-Owen, D. (2021) ‘Strategy, rationality, and the idea of public opinion in Britain, 1870–1914’, Historical Research, 94(264): 397–418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mullins, R.E. (2016) The Transformation of British and American Naval Policy in the Pre-Dreadnought Era. Ideas, Culture and Strategy, edited by J. Beeler, Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murray, M. (2019) The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nauticus (ed) (1899) Jahrbuch für Deutschlands Seeinteressen, Berlin: Mittler und Sohn.

  • Nauticus (ed) (1907) Jahrbuch für Deutschlands Seeinteressen, Berlin: Mittler und Sohn.

  • Neuhaus-Wilmersdorf, E. (1906) ‘Die Seeinteressen des Deutschen Reiches’, Illustrierte Zeitung, 08 February, pp 208–11.

  • Office of Naval Intelligence (ed) (1909) Information Concerning Some of the Principal Navies of the World: A Series of Tables Compiled to Answer Popular Inquiry, Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Osterhammel, J. (2009) Die Verwandlung der Welt. Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, München: Beck.

  • Painlevé, P. (1911) ‘Rapport fait au nom de la commission du budget chargée d’examiner le projet de loi pourtant fixation du budget générale de l’exercice 1912 (ministère de la marine)’, Journal officiel de la République française [Documents Parlementaires/Chambre] 1911, Annexe No. 1244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parkinson, R. (2008) Late Victorian Navy. The Pre-Dreadnought Era and the Origins of the First World War, Suffolk: Boydell Press.

  • Pouliot, V. (2016) International Pecking Orders. The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pretyman, E. (1904) Speech, 04 August, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/139.

  • Ranft, B. (ed) (1986) Ironclad to Trident. 100 Years of Defence Commentary, Brassey’s 1886–1986. Centenary Vol. of Brassey’s Naval Annual, London: Brassey’s Defence Publishers

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rassow, H. (1901) Deutschlands Seemacht (10th edn), Elberfeld: Baedeker’sche Buch- und Kunsthandlung u. Buchdruckerei, in Bundesarchiv RM 3/9816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Renshon, J. (2017) Fighting for Status. Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Richter, E. (1899) Speech, 14 December, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 168.

  • Rickert, H. (1890a) Speech, 10 January, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 112.

  • Rickert, H. (1890b) Speech, 9 January, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 112.

  • Robertson, E. (1899) Speech, 16 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] IV/68.

  • Ropp, T. (1987) The Development of a Modern Navy. French Naval Policy, 1871–1904, edited by S. Roberts, Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rose, A. (2011) Zwischen Empire und Kontinent. Britische Außenpolitik vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg, München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rousseau, A. (1908) ‘Enquête Maritime. La situation navale’, Le Temps, 13 May, p. 1.

  • Rowlands, K. (2019 )Naval Diplomacy for the 21st Century. A Model for the Post-Cold War Global Order, London: Routledge.

  • Rüger, J. (2007) The Great Naval Game. Britain and Germany in the Age of Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schake, K. (2017) Safe Passage. The Transition from British to American Hegemony, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Snowden, P. (1914) Speech, 18 March, Hansard [Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons] V/59.

  • Sondhaus, L. (1997) Preparing for Weltpolitik. German Sea Power before the Tirpitz Era, Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.

  • Stein, O. (2007) Die deutsche Heeresrüstungspolitik 1890–1914. Das Militär und der Primat der Politik, Paderborn: Schöningh.

  • Steinmetz, W. (2019) ‘Introduction. Concepts and practices of comparison in modern history’, in W. Steinmetz (ed) The Force of Comparison. A New Perspective on Modern European History and the Contemporary World, New York: Berghahn, pp 1–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thomson, G. (1906) Speech, 22 November, Journal officiel de la République française [Débats Parlementaires/Chambre] 1906.

  • Thomson, G. (1909) Speech, 16 July, Journal officiel de la République française [Débats Parlementaires/Chambre] 1909.

  • Tooze, J.A. (2014) The Deluge. The Great War, America and the Remaking of the Global Order, 1916–1931, London: Lane.

  • von Bennigsen, R. (1891) Speech, 07 March, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 116.

  • von Hollmann, F. (1891) Speech, 07 March, Stenographische Berichte des Reichstags 116.

  • von Tirpitz, A. (1896) Letter to Albrecht von Stosch, 13 February, in V. Berghahn and W. Deist (eds) (1988) Rüstung im Zeichen der wilhelminischen Weltpolitik. Grundlegende Dokumente 1890–1914, Düsseldorf: Droste, pp 114–17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Walser, R. (1992) France’s Search for a Battle Fleet. Naval Policy and Naval Power 1898–1914, New York, NY: Garland.

  • Bonn International Center for Conversion (ed) (1995) Conversion Survey 1996. Global Disarmament, Demilitarization and Demobilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boysen, S. (1986) ‘Der Beitrag der Rüstungskontrolle zur Stabilität in Europa’, in E. Forndran and H. Schmidt (eds) Konventionelle Rüstung im Ost-West-Vergleich: Zur Beurteilung militärischer Potentiale und Fähigkeiten, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp 473–501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crawford, D. (2001) Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE). A Review and Update of Key Treaty Elements, Washington DC: US Department of State.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dunay, P. (1991) The CFE Treaty: History, Achievements and Shortcomings, PRIF-Report 24, Frankfurt am Main: PRIF.

  • Hartmann, R., Heydrich, W. and Meyer-Landrut, N. (1994) Der Vertrag über die konventionellen Streitkräfte in Europa. Vertragswerk, Verhandlungsgeschichte, Kommentar, Dokumentation, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1989) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 6/1989, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1990a) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 5/1990, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1990b) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 7/1990, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1990c) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 9/1990, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1990d) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 11/1990, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1991) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 1/1991, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Institute for Defense and Disarmament Studies (1992) The Arms Control Reporter. A Chronicle of Treaties, Negotiations, Proposals, Weapons and Policy, 2/1992, Brookline, MA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kohl, H. (1990) ‘Kohl on his Caucasus meeting with Gorbachev, 17 July 1990’, in K.H. Jarausch and V. Gransow (eds) Uniting Germany: Documents and Debates, 1944–1993, translated by A. Brown and B. Cooper, Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp 175–8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Madejka, Z. (1997) ‘How the Warsaw Pact was dissolved’, Perspectives, 8: 55–65.

  • NATO (2023) ‘North Atlantic Council statement on the Allied response to Russia’s withdrawal from the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, Brussels’, 7 November, Available from www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_219811.htm [Accessed 28 November 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) (1990) Treaty on Conventional Arms in Europe, 19 November, www.osce.org/files/f/documents/4/9/14087.pdf [Accessed 28 November 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • OSCE (1992a) Agreement on the Principles and Procedures for the Implementation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, 15 May, https://nuke.fas.org/control/cfe/text/tashka.htm [Accessed 28 November 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • OSCE (1992b) Final Document of the Extraordinary Conference of the States Parties to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, 5 June, https://nuke.fas.org/control/cfe/text/osloa.htm [Accessed 28 November 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Russia (2023) ‘Foreign Ministry statement on the completion of the procedure for the Russian Federation’s withdrawal from the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty)’, Moscow, 7 November, https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/1913546/ [Accessed 28 November 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Soviet Union Ministry of Defence (1987) Whence the Threat to Peace (4th edn), Moscow: Military Publishing House.

  • Baum, M.A. and Potter, P.K. (2019) ‘Media, public opinion, and foreign policy in the age of social media’, The Journal of Politics, 81(2): 747–56.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Berenskötter, F. (2011) ‘Reclaiming the vision thing: constructivists as students of the future’, International Studies Quarterly, 55(3): 647–68.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cave, S., Dihal, K. and Dillon, S. (2020) ‘Introduction: Imagining AI’, in S. Cave, K. Dihal and S. Dillon (eds) AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 1–22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cleveland, H.M. (1963) ‘Memorandum from the assistant secretary of state for international organization affairs (Cleveland) to acting secretary of state ball, Washington, 20 November 1963’, in P. Claussen, E.M. Duncan and J.A. Soukup (eds) (2001) Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume XXV, Organization of Foreign Policy; Information Policy; United Nations; Scientific Matters, Document 411, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Department of State (1966) ‘Department of state policy paper, Washington, October 1966’, in S.K. Holly (ed) (1999) Foreign Relations of The United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXXIV, Energy Diplomacy and Global Issues, Document 55, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Drezner, D. (2019) ‘Technological change and international relations’, International Relations, 33(2): 286–303.

  • Feenberg, A. (1991) Critical Theory of Technology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Gadinger, F., Jarzebski, S. and Yildiz, T. (2014a) ‘Politische Narrative. Konturen einer politikwissenschaftlichen Erzähltheorie’, in F. Gadinger, S. Jarzebski and T. Yildiz (eds) Politische Narrative, Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, pp 3–39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gadinger, F., Jarzebski, S. and Yildiz, T. (2014b) ‘Vom Diskurs zur Erzählung. Möglichkeiten einer politikwissenschaftlichen Narrativanalyse’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 55(1): 67–93.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gerakas, E., Mabon, D.W., Patterson, D.S., Sanford, W.F. Jr., and Yee C.B. (eds) (1997) ‘National Intelligence Estimate, NIE 11–9–63’, Washington, 15 July 1963, Document 295, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volumes VII, VIII, IX, Arms Control; National Security Policy; Foreign Economic Policy, Microfiche Supplement, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gerakas, E., Patterson, D.S. and Yee, C.B. (eds) (1997) ‘Record of Meeting of the Executive Committee of the Committee of Principals’, Washington, 8 July 1968, Document 252, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XI, Arms Control and Disarmament, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v11/d252

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Guzzini, S. (2009) On the Measure of Power and the Power of Measure in International Relations, DIIS Working Paper, 28. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hagström, L. and Gustafsson, K. (2019) ‘Narrative power: how storytelling shapes East Asian international politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(4): 387–406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Homolar, A. (2022) ‘A call to arms: hero–villain narratives in US security discourse’, Security Dialogue, 53(4): 324–41.

  • Horowitz, M.C. (2018) ‘Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power’, Texas National Security Review, 1(3): 36–57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hudson, D., Finn, E. and Wylie, R. (2023) ‘What can science fiction tell us about the future of artificial intelligence policy?’, AI & Society, 38: 197–211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kaminski, A. (2010) Technik als Erwartung. Grundzüge einer allgemeinen Technikphilosophie, Bielefeld: Transcript.

  • Krebs, R.R. (2015) Narrative and the Making of US National Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lindsay, J.R. (2020) Information Technology and Military Power, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Mabon, D.W. and Patterson, D.S. (eds) (1995) ‘Memorandum of Conversation, Washington, 10 January 1963’, Document 256, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1961–1963, Volume VII, Arms Control and Disarmament, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v07/d256

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Manjikian, M. (2018) ‘Social construction of technology. How objects acquire meaning in society’, in D.R. McCarthy (ed) Technology and World Politics. An Introduction, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, pp 25–41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCarthy, D.R. (2015) Power, Information Technology, and International Relations Theory. The Power and Politics of US Foreign Policy and the Internet, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCarthy, D.R. (2018) ‘Introduction: technology in world politics’, in D.R. McCarthy (ed) Technology and World Politics. An Introduction, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, pp 1–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miskimmon, A. and O’Loughlin, B. (2017) ‘Understanding international order and power transition. A strategic narrative approach’, in A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin and L. Roselle (eds) Forging the World. Strategic Narratives and International Relations, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp 276–310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NAIRR Task Force (2023) Strengthening and Democratizing the U.S. Artificial Intelligence Innovation Ecosystem. An Implementation Plan for a National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource, 13 January, www.ai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NAIRR-TF-Final-Report-2023.pdf [Accessed 2 March 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NIC (National Intelligence Council) (2008) Global Trends 2025. A Transformed World, November, www.dni.gov/index.php/gt2040-home/gt2040-media-and-downloads [Accessed 10 October 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NIC (2012) Global Trends 2030. Alternative Worlds, December, www.dni.gov/index.php/gt2040-home/gt2040-media-and-downloads [Accessed 10 October 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NIC (2017) Global Trends. Paradox of Progress, January, www.dni.gov/index.php/gt2040-home/gt2040-media-and-downloads [Accessed 10 October 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NIC (2021) Global Trends 2040. A More Contested World, March, www.dni.gov/index.php/gt2040-home/gt2040-media-and-downloads [Accessed 10 October 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NSCAI (National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence) (2019) Interim Report, November, www.nscai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NSCAI-Interim-Report-for-Congress_201911.pdf [Accessed 27 June 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NSCAI (2020a) First Quarter Recommendations, March, www.nscai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NSCAI-First-Quarter-Recommendations.pdf [Accessed 27 June 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NSCAI (2020b) Interim Report and Third Quarter Recommendations, October, www.nscai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NSCAI-Interim-Report-and-Third-Quarter-Recommendations.pdf [Accessed 27 June 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NSCAI (2020c) Second Quarter Recommendations, 23 January, www.nscai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NSCAI-Q2-Memo_20200722.pdf [Accessed 27 June 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NSCAI (2021) Final Report, March, https://reports.nscai.gov/final-report/table-of-contents/ [Accessed 27 June 2022].

  • Oppermann, K. and Spencer, A. (2018) ‘Narrating success and failure. Congressional debates on the “Iran Nuclear Deal”’, European Journal of International Relations, 24(2): 268–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pinch, T. and Bijker, W.E. (1989) ‘The social construction of facts and artefacts. How the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other’, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp 17–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sismondo, S. (2010) An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies (2nd edn), Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Spencer, A. (2016) Romantic Narratives in International Politics. Pirates, Rebels, and Mercenaries, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stevens, T. (2018) ‘Cyberweapons: power and the governance of the invisible’, International Politics, 55(3–4): 482–505.

  • US Congress (2018) John McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. 115–232, 13 August, www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5515 [Accessed 5 April 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • US Congress (2021a) National Digital Reserve Corps Act, H. R. 4818, 117th Cong., 29 July, www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4818?s=1&r=99 [Accessed 5 April 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • US Congress (2021b) United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021, S. 1260, 117th Cong., 8 June, www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1260 [Accessed 5 April 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • US Congress (2021c) William M. Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, Pub. L. 116–283, Division E, 1 January, www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6395 [Accessed 6 April 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • US Congress (2022) CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, Pub. L. 117–167, 9 August, www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346/text [Accessed 15 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Viehöver, W. (2012) ‘“Menschen lesbarer Machen”: Narration, Diskurs, Referenz’, in M. Arnold, G. Dressel and W. Viehöver (eds) Erzählungen im Öffentlichen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp 65–132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2017) National Security Strategy of the United States of America, December, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf [Accessed 2 March 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2021a) ‘Remarks by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan at the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence Global Emerging Technology Summit’, 13 July, www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/briefing-room/2021/07/13/remarks-by-national-security-advisor-jake-sullivan-at-the-national-security-commission-on-artificial-intelligence-global-emerging-technology-summit/ [Accessed 17 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2021b) ‘Statement of President Joe Biden on Senate Passage of the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act’, 8 June, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/08/statement-of-president-joe-biden-on-senate-passage-of-the-u-s-innovation-and-competition-act/ [Accessed 17 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2021c) ‘The Biden Administration Launches the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force’, 10 June, www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2021/06/10/the-biden-administration-launches-the-national-artificial-intelligence-research-resource-task-force/ [Accessed 17 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2022a) ‘Remarks by President Biden at Signing of H.R. 4346, “The CHIPS and Science Act of 2022”’, 9 August, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/08/09/remarks-by-president-biden-at-signing-of-h-r-4346-the-chips-and-science-act-of-2022/ [Accessed 17 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2022b) ‘State of the Union Address 2022’, 1 March, www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2022/ [Accessed 17 August 2022].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • White House (2023) ‘State of the Union Address 2023’, 7 February, www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2023/ [Accessed 2 March 2023].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, C.E. (1955) ‘Memorandum from the Secretary of Defense (Wilson) to the President, Washington, 28 June 1955’, in D.S. Patterson (ed) (1990) Foreign Relations of the United States, 1955–1957, Regulation of Armaments; Atomic Energy, Volume XX, Document 42, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, J.G. (ed.) (2001) ‘“Memorandum of Conversation”, Moscow, 12 August 1986’, Document 144, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1981–1988, Volume XI, Start I, Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1981-88v11/d144 [Accessed 30 January 2024].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Yildiz, T., Gadinger, F. and Jarzebski, S. (2015) ‘Das narrative Element des Politischen: Überlegungen zu einer Poetologie des Wissens in der Politikwissenschaft’, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 25(3): 421–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Broome, A. and Quirk, J. (2015) ‘Governing the world at a distance: the practice of global benchmarking’, Review of International Studies, 41(5): 819–41.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Edwards, P.N. (2010) A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Friedberg, A.L. (1988) The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kelley, J.G. and Simmons, B.A. (2019) ‘Introduction: the power of global performance indicators’, International Organization, 73(3): 491–510.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kelley, J.G. and Simmons, B.A. (eds) (2020) The Power of Global Performance Indicators, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Louis, M. and Maertens, L. (2021) Why International Organizations Hate Politics: Depoliticizing the World, London: Routledge.

  • MacDonald, P.K. and Parent, J.M. (2021) ‘The status of status in world politics’, World Politics, 73(2): 358–91.

  • Müller, T. and Albert, M. (2021) ‘Whose balance? A constructivist approach to balance of power politics’, European Journal of International Security, 6(1): 109–28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rumelili, B. and Towns, A.E. (2022) ‘Driving liberal change? Global performance indices as a system of normative stratification in liberal international order’, Cooperation and Conflict, 57(2): 152–70.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sauder, M. and Espeland, W.N. (2006) ‘Strength in numbers? The advantages of multiple rankings’, Indiana Law Journal, 81(1): 205–27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tichenor, M., Merry, S.E., Grek, S. and Bandola-Gill, J. (2022) ‘Global public policy in a quantified world: sustainable development goals as epistemic infrastructures’, Policy and Society, 41(4): 431–44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Towns, A.E. and Rumelili, B. (2017) ‘Taking the pressure: unpacking the relation between norms, social hierarchies, and social pressures on states’, European Journal of International Relations, 23(4): 756–79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wohlforth, W.C. (1993) The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 61 61 28
PDF Downloads 24 24 3

Altmetrics