/img/Blank.svg)
Appendix II:
-
Figure AII.1: Lundy’s conceptual model of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, article 12 inclusion
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Al-Alosi, H. (2018) ‘Will somebody please think of the children?! Child focused and child inclusive models in family dispute resolution’, Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 29(1): 8–20.
-
Aldridge, J. (2017) ‘Introduction to the issue: “Promoting children’s participation in research, policy and practice”’, Social Inclusion, 5(3): 89–92.
-
Allport, L. (2020) ‘The voice of the child in family mediation’, in M. Roberts and M. Moscati (eds) Family Mediation: Contemporary Issues, London: Bloomsbury, pp 181–202.
-
Barlow, A. (2017) ‘Rising to the post-LASPO challenge: How should mediation respond?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(2): 203–22.
-
Barlow, A. and Ewing, J. (2020) An Evaluation of ‘Mediation in Mind’: Final Report, Exeter: University of Exeter.
-
Barlow, A., Ewing, J., Hunter, R. and Smithson, J. (2017a) Creating Paths to Family Justice Briefing Paper and Report on Key Findings, Exeter: University of Exeter.
-
Barlow, A., Hunter, R., Smithson, J. and Ewing, J. (2017b) Mapping Paths to Family Justice: Resolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times, London: Palgrave.
-
Barlow, A., Ewing, J., Benham-Clarke, S. and Newlove-Delgado, T. (2022) Transforming Relationships and Relationship Transitions with and for the Next Generation: The Healthy Relationship Education (HeaRE) and Healthy Relationship Transitions (HeaRT) Project Report and Key Findings, Exeter: University of Exeter.
-
Barlow, A., Hunter, R. and Ewing, J. (2024) ‘Mapping paths to family justice: Resolving family disputes involving children in neoliberal times’, in A. Hellner, A. Kaldal and T. Mattsson (eds) Children in Custody Conflicts Disputes: Matching Legal Proceedings to the Problem, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 107–27.
-
Bell, F. (2016) ‘Barriers to empowering children in private family law proceedings’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 30(3): 225–47.
-
Bell, F., Cashmore, J., Parkinson, P. and Single, J. (2012) ‘Choosing child-inclusive mediation’, Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 23(4): 253–64.
-
Bell, F., Cashmore, J., Parkinson, P. and Single, J. (2013) ‘Outcomes of child-inclusive mediation’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 27(1): 116–42.
-
Bell, F., Cashmore, J. and Harman, J. (2021) ‘Australia’, in W. Sharma, M. Freeman, N. Taylor and M. Bruning (eds) International Handbook on Child Participation in Family Law, Cambridge: Intersentia, pp 89–102.
-
Benham-Clarke, S., Ewing, J., Barlow, A. and Newlove-Delgado, T. (2022a) ‘Learning how relationships work: A thematic analysis of young people and relationship professionals’ perspectives on relationships and relationship education’, BMC Public Health, 22(2322): 1–11.
-
Benham-Clarke, S., Roberts, G., Janssens, A. and Newlove-Delgado, T. (2022b) ‘Healthy relationship education programmes for young people: Systematic review of outcomes’, Pastoral Care in Education, 1–23.
-
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.
-
British Academy (2022) Reframing Childhood: Final Report of the Childhood Policy Programme, July 2022, London: British Academy.
-
Brown, T. and Campbell, A. (2013) ‘Parents, children and family relationship centres: what’s working?’, Children Australia, 38(4): 192–7.
-
Brown, W. (2006) ‘American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism and de-democratization’, Political Theory, 34(6): 690–714.
-
Butler, I., Scanlan, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G. and Murch, M. (2002) ‘Children’s involvement in their parents’ divorce: Implications for practice’, Children and Society, 16(2): 89–102.
-
Butler-Sloss, E. (1988) Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland 1987, London: HMSO.
-
Carson, R., Dunstan, E., Dunstan, J. and Roopani, D. (2018) Children and Young People in Separated Families: Family Law System Experiences and Needs, Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
-
Cashmore, J. and Parkinson, P. (2008) ‘Children’s and parents’ perceptions on children’s participation in decision making after parental separation and divorce’, Family Court Review, 46(1): 91–104.
-
Cashmore, J., Parkinson, P., Weston, R., Patulny, R.,Redmond, G., Qu, L., Baxter, J., Rajkovic, M., Sitek, T. and Katz, I. (2010) Shared Care Parenting Arrangements since the 2006 Family Law Reforms: Report to the Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
-
Council of Europe Recommendation (2003) Family Mediation and Gender Equality No. 1639.
-
Daly, A. (2018a) Children, Autonomy and the Courts: Beyond the Right to be Heard, Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff.
-
Daly, A. (2018b) ‘No weight for due weight: Children’s autonomy principle in best interest proceedings’, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 26(1): 61–92.
-
Dennison, G. (2010) ‘Is mediation compatible with children’s rights?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 32(2): 169–82.
-
Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth (2021) Participation Framework: National Framework for Children and Young People’s Participation in Decision-making, Dublin: Government Publications.
-
Department of Children and Youth Affairs (2015) National Strategy on Children and Young People’s Participation in Decision-making, 2015–2020, Dublin: Government Publications.
-
DfE (Department for Education) (2019) Relationships Education, Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) and Health Education Statutory Guidance for Governing Bodies, Proprietors, Head Teachers, Principals, Senior Leadership Teams, Teachers, London: Department for Education.
-
Diduck, A. (2014) ‘Justice by ADR in private family matters: Is it fair and is it possible?’, Family Law, 44: 616–19.
-
Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F. (2012) Family Law, Gender and the State (3rd edn), Oxford: Hart.
-
Dimopoulos, G. (2021) ‘A theory of children’s decisional privacy’, Legal Studies, 41(3): 430–53.
-
Dimopoulos, G. (2022) Decisional Privacy and the Rights of the Child, Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Douglas, G., Murch, M., Scanlan, L. and Perry, A. (2000) ‘Safeguarding children’s welfare in non-contentious divorce: Towards a new conception of the legal process?’, The Modern Law Review, 63(2): 177–96.
-
Doyle, M., Harris, J., Millership, L. and Shepherd, J. (2017) State of Children’s Rights in Scotland, 2017, Scotland: Together (Scottish Alliance for Children’s Rights).
-
Dunn, J. and Deater-Deckard, K. (2001) Children’s Views of Their Changing Families, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
-
Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M. (2013) Family Justice: The Work of Family Judges in Uncertain Times, Oxford: Hart.
-
Ewing, J., Hunter, R., Barlow, A. and Smithson, J. (2015) ‘Children’s voices: Centre-stage or side-lined in out-of-court dispute resolution in England and Wales?’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 27(1): 43–61.
-
Family Solutions Children’s Group (2023) What about Me? A Child’s Right to Matter: Report of a Multi-Disciplinary Consultation Exploring the Needs of Children When Parents Separate. UK: Family Solutions Group. Available at: https://www.familysolutionsgroup.co.uk/a-childs-right-to-matter-2/
-
Family Solutions Group (2020) ‘What about Me?’ Reframing Support for Families Following Parental Separation, Judiciary UK, 12 November. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/FamilySolutionsGroupReport_WhatAboutMe_12November2020-2-final-2.pdf
-
Ferguson, L. (2013) ‘Not merely rights for children but children’s rights: The theory gap and the assumption of the importance of children’s rights’, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21: 177–208.
-
Fineman, M. (2004) The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency, New York: New Press.
-
Fineman, M. (2013) ‘Equality, autonomy, and the vulnerable subject in law and politics’, in M. Fineman and A. Grear (eds) Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp 13–28.
-
Fineman, M. (2019) ‘Vulnerability and social justice’, Valparaiso University Law Review, 53(2): 341–70.
-
Fleiss, J., Levin, B. and Paik, M. (2003) ‘The measurement of interrater agreement’, in W. Shewart, S. Wilks, J. Fleiss, B. Levin and M. Paik (eds) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd edn), New York: Wiley, pp 598–626.
-
FMC (Family Mediation Council) (2014) FMC Manual Professional Standards and Self-Regulatory Framework, Family Mediation Council, September 2014 (last updated 1 March 2022). Available at: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FMC-Manual-of-Professonal-Standards-Regulatory-Framework-v1.4.1-Updated-1-March-2022.pdf
-
FMC (Family Mediation Council) (2016) Code of Practice for Family Mediators, Family Mediation Council (September 2016). Available at: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/FMC-Code-of-Practice-September-2016-2.pdf
-
FMC (Family Mediation Council) (2018) Code of Practice for Family Mediators, Family Mediation Council (v.1.3, November 2018). Available at: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/FMC-Code-of-Practice-v1.3-November-2018.pdf
-
FMC (Family Mediation Council) (2017) Family Mediation Survey, Autumn 2017. Available at: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Family-Mediation-Survey-Autumn-2017.pdf
-
FMC (Family Mediation Council) (2019) Family Mediation Survey, 2019. Available at: https://www.familymediationcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Family-Mediation-Survey-Autumn-2019-Results.pdf
-
Forde, L. and Kilkelly, U. (2021) ‘Incorporating the CRC in Ireland’, in U. Kilkelly, L. Lundy and B. Byrne (eds) Incorporating the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into National Law, Cambridge: Intersentia, pp 177–202.
-
Fortin, J., Hunt, J. and Scanlan, L. (2012) Taking a Longer View of Contact: The Perspectives of Young Adults Who Experience Parental Separation in Their Youth. Project report, School of Law, Brighton.
-
Freeman, M. (2007) ‘Why it remains important to take children’s rights seriously’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(1): 5–23.
-
Freeman, M. (2010) ‘The human rights of children’, Current Legal Problems, 63(1): 1–44.
-
Freeman, M. and Lowe, N. (2021) ‘England and Wales’, in W. Sharma, M. Freeman, N. Taylor and M. Bruning (eds) International Handbook on Child Participation in Family Law, Cambridge: Intersentia, pp 171–84.
-
Fuller, T., Hendrick, J. and Beck, A. (2022) ‘Fast fact and concepts #439: Undue influence vs relational autonomy in clinical decision- making’, Journal of Palliative Medicine, 25(6): 996–7.
-
Gilmore, S. (2017) ‘Use of the UNCRC in family law cases in England and Wales’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 25(2): 500–18.
-
Guggenheim, M. (2007) What’s Wrong with Children’s Rights, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
-
Hanna, A. and Lundy, L. (2021) ‘Children’s voices’, in C. Tomas, G. Trevisan, M. Leote de Carvalho and N. Fernandes (eds) Key Concepts on Sociology of Childhood, Braga: Uminho Editora, pp 465–8.
-
Herring, J. (1999) ‘The Human Rights Act and the welfare principle in family law: Conflicting or complementary?’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11(3): 223–36.
-
Herring, J. (2017) ‘Commentary on Re A (Conjoined Twins)’, in H. Stalford, K. Hollingsworth and S. Gilmore (eds) Rewriting Children’s Judgements: From Academic Vision to New Practice, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp 257–63.
-
Hollingsworth, K. and Stalford, H. (2017) ‘Towards children’s rights judgements’, in H. Stalford, K. Hollingsworth and S. Gilmore (eds) Rewriting Children’s Judgements: From Academic Vision to New Practice, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp 53–85.
-
Hunter, R. (2017) ‘Inducing demand for family mediation – before and after LASPO’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(2): 189–202.
-
JUSTICE (2022) Improving Access to Justice for Separating Families, London: JUSTICE.
-
Kaganas, F. (2017) ‘Justifying the LASPO Act: Authenticity, necessity, suitability, responsibility and autonomy’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(2): 168–88.
-
Kay-Flowers, S. (2019) Childhood Experiences of Separation and Divorce: Reflections from Young Adults, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
-
Lansdown, G. (2001) Promoting Children’s Participation in Democratic Decision-Making, Innocenti Insights no. 6. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
-
Lansdown, G. (2005) The Evolving Capacities of the Child, Innocenti Insights no. 11. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
-
Lansdown, G. (2011) Every Child’s Right to be Heard: A Resource Guide on the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment No.12, London: Save the Children UK on behalf of Save the Children and UNICEF.
-
Lansdown, G. (2019) Conceptual Framework for Measuring Outcomes of Adolescent Participation, New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
-
Lansdown, G. (2022) ‘Article 5: The right to parental guidance consistent with the evolving capacity of the child’, in Z. Vaghri, J. Zermatten, G. Lansdown and R. Ruggiero (eds) Monitoring State Compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 25, Cham: Springer, pp 117–24.
-
Law Society (2010) Family Law Protocol (3rd edn), London: Law Society Publishing.
-
Law Society (2023) ‘Children left in limbo by family courts crisis’, press release, The Law Society, 1 August.
-
Lee, N. (2001) Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty, Buckingham: Open University Press.
-
Lundy, L. (2007) ‘“Voice” is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’, British Educational Research Journal, 33(6): 927–42.
-
Lundy, L.,Kilkelly, U. and Byrne, B. (2012) ‘Incorporation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Law: A comparative review’, International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21(3): 442–63.
-
Lundy, L., Kilkelly, U., Byrne, B. and Kang, J. (2013) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Study of Legal Implementation in 12 Countries, Belfast: UNICEF and Queens University.
-
Lundy, L., Tobin, J. and Parkes, A. (2019) ‘Article 12: The right to respect for the views of the child’, in J. Tobin (ed) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 397–434.
-
Maclean, M. and Eekelaar, J. (2016) Lawyers and Mediators: The Brave New World of Services for Separating Families, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
-
Mant, J. (2022) Litigants in Person and the Family Justice System, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
-
McCall-Smith, K. (2021) ‘Entrenching children’s participation through UNCRC incorporation in Scotland’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(8): 1–24.
-
McIntosh, J. and Long, C. (2006) Children Beyond Dispute: A Prospective Study of Outcomes from Child Focused and Child Inclusive Post-Separation Family Dispute Resolution, Final Report, Melbourne: Family Transitions Pty Ltd/La Trobe University.
-
McIntosh, J., Wells, Y., Smyth, B. and Long, C. (2008) ‘Child-focused and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of postseparation adjustment’, Family Court Review, 46(1): 105–24.
-
MoJ (Ministry of Justice) (2015) Final Report of the Voice of the Child Dispute Resolution Advisory Group, London: Ministry of Justice.
-
MoJ (Ministry of Justice) (2020) Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law Children Cases Final Report, London: Ministry of Justice.
-
MoJ (Ministry of Justice) (2023) Family Court Statistics Quarterly: October to December 2022, GOV.UK, 30 March 2023.
-
MoJ (Ministry of Justice) and DfE (Department for Education) (2012a) The Government Response to the Family Justice Review: A System with Children and Families at its Heart, February 2012, Cm 8273.
-
MoJ (Ministry of Justice) and DfE (Department for Education) (2012b) The Government Response to the Family Justice Review: A Guide for Children and Young People, June 2012. Cm 8273, Norwich: TSO (The Stationery Office).
-
Murch, M. (2018) Supporting Children when Parents Separate: Embedding a Crisis Intervention Approach within Family Justice, Education and Mental Health Policy, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
-
Neale, B. (2002) ‘Dialogues with children: Children, divorce and citizenship’, Childhood, 9(4): 455–75.
-
Neale, B. and Flowerdew, J. (2007) ‘New structures, new agency: The dynamics of child-parent relationships after divorce’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(1): 25–42.
-
Norgrove, D. (2011) Family Justice Review, London: Ministry of Justice, the Department for Education and Welsh Government.
-
O’Quigley, A. (2000) Listening to Children’s Views: The Findings and Recommendations of Recent Research, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York Publishing Services Ltd.
-
Parkinson, L. (2020) Family Mediation (4th edn), Bristol: Jordan Publishing.
-
Parkinson, P. and Cashmore, J. (2008) The Voice of a Child in Family Law Disputes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Reece, H. (2003) Divorcing Responsibly, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
-
Roberts, M. (2014) Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice (4th edn), London: Routledge.
-
Roberts, M. and Moscati, M. (2020) ‘Introduction’, in M. Roberts and M. Moscati (eds) Family Mediation: Contemporary Issues, London: Bloomsbury, pp 1–10.
-
Rudd, B., Ogle, R., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A. and D’Onofrio, B. (2015) ‘Child-informed mediation study follow-up: Comparing the frequency of relitigation following different types of family mediation’, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(4): 452–7.
-
Saini, M. (2019) The Voice of the Child in Family Law: Exploring Strategies, Challenges, and Best Practices for Canada, Ottawa: Department of Justice.
-
Sikveland, R. and Stokoe, E. (2016) ‘Dealing with resistance in initial intake and inquiry calls to mediation: the power of “willing”’, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33(3): 235–54.
-
Smart, C. (2004) ‘Equal shares: rights for fathers or recognition for children?’, Critical Social Policy, 24(4): 484–503.
-
Smart, C. and Neale, B. (1999) Family Fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Smithson, J., Barlow, A.,Hunter, R. and Ewing, J. (2015) ‘The “child’s best interests” as an argumentative resource in family mediation sessions’, Discourse Studies 17(5): 609–23.
-
Stalford, H. and Hollingsworth, K. (2020) ‘“This case is about you and your future”: Towards judgments for children’, Modern Law Review, 83(5): 1030–58.
-
Stalford, H., Cairns, L. and Marshall, J. (2017) ‘Achieving child friendly justice through child friendly methods: Let’s start with the right to information’, Social Inclusion, 5(3): 207–18.
-
Stewart, J. (2007) ‘The mixed economy of welfare in historical context’, in M. Powell (ed) Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press, pp 23–40.
-
Symonds, J., Dermott, E., Hitchings, E. and Staples, E. (2022) Separating Families: Experiences of Separation and Support, London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
-
Tobin, J. (2013) ‘Justifying children’s rights’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21: 395–441.
-
Tobin, J. (2015) ‘Understanding children’s rights: A vision beyond vulnerability’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 84(2): 155–82.
-
Tobin, J. and Varadan, S. (2019) ‘Article 5: The right to parental direction and guidance and consistent with a child’s evolving capacities’, in J. Tobin and P. Alston (eds) The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 159–85.
-
Tolich, M. (2004) ‘Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants’, Qualitative Sociology, 27(1): 101–6.
-
UNCRC Committee (2021) List of Issues prior to Submission of the Combined Sixth and Seventh Reports of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. CRC/C/GBR/QPR/6-7. Published 04 March 2021.
-
UNCRC Committee (2023) Concluding Observations on the Combined Sixth and Seventh Periodic Reports of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, adopted by the Committee at its ninety-third session (8–26 May 2023). Published 22 June 2023.
-
UNCRC General Comment No. 12 (2009) The Right of the Child to be Heard, CRC/C/GC/12. Fifty-first session, UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
-
UNCRC General Comment No. 14 (2013) On the Right of the Child to Have His or Her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration (art. 3, para. 1 ), CRC/C/GC/14. Sixty-second session, UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
-
Varadan, S. (2019) ‘The principle of evolving capacities under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child’, The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 27(2): 306–38.
-
Voice of the Child Advisory Group (2015) Final Report, March 2015. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f96cced915d74e33f75c9/voice-of-the-child-advisory-group-report.pdf
-
Walker, J. and Lake-Carroll, A. (2014) ‘Hearing the voices of children and young people in dispute resolution processes’ in Report of the Mediation Task Force, June 2014. Available at: https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/family-mediation-task-force-report.pdf
-
Wallbank, J. and Herring, J. (2014) ‘Vulnerabilities, care and family law’, in J. Wallbank and J. Herring (eds) Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law, London: Routledge, pp 1–21.
-
Walter, J. and Ross, L. (2014) ‘Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism’, Paediatrics, 133(Supplement 1): 16–23.
-
Zhang, A. and Siminoff, L. (2003) ‘The role of the family in treatment decision making by patients with cancer’, Oncology Nursing Forum, 30(6): 1022–8.
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 43 | 33 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 42 | 35 | 0 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk
Powered by PubFactory