Search Results
The ways in which researchers carry out ethical and inclusive research has been reimagined as a result of COVID-19. The predominant response has been to take research online through a range of methods and technologies. Through reflections on carrying out research during a global pandemic, key issues of digital exclusion have been brought to the fore. In addition to digital exclusion there is the risk that research has changed in a way that positions participants unavoidably as objects of research rather that subjects who can engage with researchers in a transparent and authentic manner. The reflections are based upon researching disability and engaging with disabled participants. There is a recognition that for many disabled participants, engaging in research through digital technologies provides autonomy and control about how and when they can respond. However, this chapter will carry an important message and warning for researchers to be mindful about the ways in which digital methods can be and are exclusionary. Practical examples of seeking to ensure that an authentic relationship can be built with participants through digital methods in a way that leaves them feeling engaged rather than ‘visited’ will be provided.
Within the context of COVID-19, the potential for a reimagining of how we carry out ethical and inclusive research has come to the fore. There is the possibility for widespread use of digital methods of conducting research, however, there are access, inclusivity and ethical issues to be closely considered. This chapter will specifically focus upon how digital methods influence both disabled participant and researcher experiences. Disability will be a key focus throughout; however, the key points could be applied to a variety of projects.
Following a nationwide lockdown in March 2020 as a result of the global pandemic COVID-19, there has been a rise in the use of online spaces and technologies. This time has enabled and, in many cases, enforced innovation as researchers have had to create new ways of engaging with participants. Digital technologies are often assumed to be open and accessible to ‘all’, however, digital inequalities continue to exist and shape people’s lives (Robinson et al., 2015). As researchers, we must avoid falling into the trap of describing online research as solely opportunistic and without potential risk. With the rise in digital methods of data collection, the need to avoid xacerbating inequalities and power imbalances is increasingly salient.
With the use of digital methods, it is essential that participants have a full understanding of who the researcher is and why research is being carried out.
