Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Engineering advice in policy making: a new domain of inquiry in evidence and policy

View author details View Less
  • 1 University College London, UK
  • | 2 Cardiff University, UK
  • | 3 UK National Infrastructure Commission, UK
  • | 4 UK Government Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Background:

Academic research on technical advice to policy commonly focuses on social and related policy areas such as health, education and crime () and disciplinary advice from science disciplines (; ). Little or no prior research in the social sciences have explored engineering expertise in policy domains where such advice is critical (e.g. energy policy).

Aims and objectives:

We aim to establish ‘engineering advice’ as a new domain of inquiry by showing how civil servants view it as distinctive (from ‘science advice’), important and similar to policy making – implying it can clash or complement it.

Methods:

18 qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of officials across a UK ministry were conducted by the authors (all but one of whom were civil servants) in 2012. The qualitative data were thematically coded to address the study aims.

Findings:

A majority of officials spontaneously identified engineering expertise as both distinctive and important for their work. There was clear evidence that it both complemented and clashed with policymaking.

Discussion and conclusions:

We identified a range of interactions that imply a need to consider styles of management internal deployment of experts within policy organisations as well as the implications for policy making and engineering expertise given the way practices overlap. Further research on the ontological, epistemological nature of engineering as it relates to policy making is needed if governments and therefore society are to fully benefit from engineering advice.

  • Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J. and Naef, R. (2008) Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business, R&D Management, 38(4): 37291.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Guston, D.H., Jäger, J. and Mitchell, R.B. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14): 808691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, B. (2013) Engineering policy: evidence, advice and execution, in R. Doubleday and J. Wilsdon (eds) Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall, pp 738, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, A.C. (2016) Exploring the scope of science advice: social sciences in the UK government, Palgrave Communications, 2(16044): 19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, A.C.G. (2017a) Building a socio-technical energy research community: theory, practice and impact, Energy Research & Social Science, 26: 11520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, A. C. G. (2017b) Building physics into the social: enhancing the policy impact of energy studies and energy social science research, Energy Research & Social Science, 26: 806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doubleday, R. and Wilsdon, J. (eds) (2013) Future directions for scientific advice in Whitehall, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/ (Accessed: August 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gluckman, P. (2014) Policy: the art of science advice to government, Nature 507(7491): 1635. doi: 10.1038/507163a

  • Greenhalgh, T. and Russell, J. (2009) Evidence-based policymaking: a critique, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2): 30418. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0085

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Head, B.W. (2010) Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges, Policy and Society, 29(2): 7794. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J. (1995) The Active Interview, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, doi: 10.4135/9781412986120.

  • Irving, G.L., Ayoko, O.B. and Ashkanasy, N.M. (2019) Collaboration, physical proximity and serendipitous encounters: avoiding collaboration in a collaborative building, Organization Studies, 0170840619856913.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jasanoff, S. (1994) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, new edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Jasanoff, S. (2013) The science of science advice, in R. Doubleday and J. Wilsdon (eds), Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall, pp 628, http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/47848/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kabo, F.W. (2016) A model of potential encounters in the workplace: the relationships of homophily, spatial distance, organizational structure, and perceived networks, Environment and Behavior, doi: 10.1177/0013916516658501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kattirtzi, M. (2016) Providing a ‘challenge function’: government social researchers in the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (2010–2015), Palgrave Communications, 2: 16064. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.64

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. and Thomas, C.J. (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges, Sustainability Science, 7(1): 2543. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, W.-M., Zhu, H.-P., Tu, J. and Xia, Y. (2009) Operational bridge responses due to road surface profile spectral excitations, Tumu Jianzhu yu Huanjing Gongcheng/Journal of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 31(1): 7276+88.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowe, P., Phillipson, J. and Wilkinson, K. (2013) Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists, Contemporary Social Science, 8(3): 20722. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2013.769617

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marvulli, L. (2017) Towards sustainable consumption: an ethnographic study of knowledge work and organisational action in public policy development and implementation, PhD thesis, Cardiff University, http://orca.cf.ac.uk/105518/ (Accessed Sep 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maxwell, K.B. (2014) Getting there from here, Nature Climate Change, 4(11): 9367. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2413

  • Millstone, E. and van Zwanenberg, P. (2001) Politics of expert advice: lessons from the early history of the BSE saga, Science and Public Policy, 28(2): 99112. doi: 10.3152/147154301781781543

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009) Policy entrepreneurship and policy change, Policy Studies Journal, 37(4): 64967. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nicolini, D. (2009) Articulating practice through the interview to the double, Management Learning, 40(2): 195212. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101230

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nutley, S.M., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Oliver, K. and Cairney, P. (2019) The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics, Palgrave Communications, 5(1): 111. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0199-0

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J. and Thomas, J. (2014) A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers, BMC Health Services Research, 14(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oreszczyn, S. (2005) GM crops in the United Kingdom: precaution as process, Science and Public Policy, 32(4): 31724. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779434

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Page, E.C. (2003) The civil servant as legislator: law making in British administration, Public Administration, 81(4): 65179. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00366.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Page, E.C. (2010) Bureaucrats and expertise: elucidating a problematic relationship in three tableaux and six jurisdictions, Sociologie du Travail, 52(2): 25573. doi: 10.4000/sdt.13902

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parkhurst, J.O. (2017) The Politics of Evidence: from Evidence-based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pielke, R.A. (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sanderson, I. (2002) Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making, Public Administration, 80(1): 122. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schenkel, R. (2010) The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making, Science 330(6012): 174951. doi: 10.1126/science.1197503

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, J.A. (2014) Engineering as willing, in P.E. Michelfelder, D.E. Goldberg, N. McCarthy, and D.P. Michelfelder (eds) Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwach, V. et al. (2007) Policy and knowledge in fisheries management: a policy brief, ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 64(4): 798803. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsm020

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shove, E. (1998) Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings, Energy Policy, 26(15): 110512. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00065-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sovacool, B.K. (2014) Diversity: energy studies need social science, Nature News 511(7511): 529. doi: 10.1038/511529a

  • Sovacool, B.K., Ryan, S.E., Stern, P.C., Janda, K., Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., Pasqualetti, M., Wilhite, H. and Lutzenhiser, L. (2015) Integrating social science in energy research, Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 959.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spruijt, P., Knol, A.B., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E. and Petersen, A.C. (2014) Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review, Environmental Science & Policy, 40: 1625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stanley, M. (2000) How to be a Civil Servant, London: Politico’s Publishing Ltd.

  • Stevens, A. (2010) Telling policy stories: an ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK, Journal of Social Policy, 40(02): 23755. doi: 10.1017/S0047279410000723

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weale, A. (2001) Science advice, democratic responsiveness and public policy, Science and Public Policy, 28(6): 41321. doi: 10.3152/147154301781781237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whitaker, E.M. and Atkinson, P. (2019) Authenticity and the interview: a positive response to a radical critique, Qualitative Research, 1468794118816885.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilkinson, K. (2011) Organised chaos: an interpretive approach to evidence-based policy making in Defra, Political Studies, 59(4): 95977. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00866.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1 University College London, UK
  • | 2 Cardiff University, UK
  • | 3 UK National Infrastructure Commission, UK
  • | 4 UK Government Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 66 26
Full Text Views 16 16 2
PDF Downloads 14 14 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions