Relationship priorities and the Australian marriage divide

Author:
Liz van Acker Griffith University, Australia

Search for other papers by Liz van Acker in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Full Access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Policymakers tackle the ‘problem’ end of the relationship spectrum, but avoid investing much in early prevention programmes, thereby contributing to a ‘marriage divide’. Although it is reasonable that distressed or divorcing couples receive more policy attention than intact families, preventative measures should be reconsidered. Addressing socioeconomic inequality, evaluating whether programmes can enhance relationship quality and acknowledging that couples – especially those at-risk – are unaware of, or uninterested in participating in preventative programmes would help.

Liz van Acker Griffith University, Australia

Search for other papers by Liz van Acker in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 142 113 4
PDF Downloads 41 26 2

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Families, Relationships and Societies
An international journal of research and debate