Global Discourse
An interdisciplinary journal of current affairs

Promoting genital autonomy by exploring commonalities between male, female, intersex, and cosmetic female genital cutting

View author details View Less
  • 1 Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, Berkeley, CA, USA
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

All forms of genital cutting – female genital cutting (FGC), intersex genital cutting, male genital cutting (MGC), and even cosmetic forms of FGC – are performed in a belief that they will improve the subject’s life. Genital autonomy is a unified principle that children should be protected from genital cutting that is not medically necessary. Safeguarding genital autonomy encompasses helping societies and individuals to explore wounds common across different forms of genital cutting regarding gender, power, the quest for cultural belonging, and social and sexual control. A desire to prevent alternative sexualities helps explain the origins of MGC’s medicalization starting in the nineteenth century, as well as the roots of the failed attempt to similarly medicalize FGC. The child with ‘ambiguous’ genitalia brings us face to face with the failure of the attempted alignment of sex and gender. Medical ethics, law, and human rights suggest a path forward toward genital autonomy.

  • 1 Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, Berkeley, CA, USA

An earlier and subsatantially different version of this article was presented on 1 September 2011 at a conference entitled ‘Law, Human Rights, and Non-Therapeutic Interventions on Children’ held at the University of Keele, UK.

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 122 122 29
Full Text Views 72 72 0
PDF Downloads 14 14 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions