If evidence-informed policy works in practice, does it matter if it doesn’t work in theory?

Author:
Iain Chalmers James Lind Library, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Iain Chalmers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

English

Professionals and policy makers sometimes do more harm than good when they intervene in the lives of other people. This should prompt humility and efforts to ensure that policies and practices are informed by rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations of relevant empirical evidence. Systematic reviews of relevant evidence must be designed to minimise the likelihood of confusing the effects of interventions with the effects of biases and chance. Systematic reviews are essential, although insufficient, for informing policies and practice. Critiques of this approach based solely on theory are unhelpful in efforts to protect the public from harmful and useless interventions.

Iain Chalmers James Lind Library, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Iain Chalmers in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2273 960 93
Full Text Views 183 32 3
PDF Downloads 216 58 7

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice