Using evidence in shaping disability policy in Romania: the case of sheltered workshops
Background:
The importance of using evidence to inform the policymaking process has been well established in the literature and practice. In Western countries evidence-based policy (EBP) is already accepted and implemented in many policy areas, including disability policy. In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) the interest in EBP (evidence-based policy) is new and limited, hampered in many aspects by the regional specificity of the public administration and welfare services reform.
Aims and objectives:
The present article aims to explore the development of evidence-based disability employment policy in Romania, in a specific area of work integration: sheltered workshops.
Methods:
The article draws on the findings of extensive research on sheltered workshops that included multiple research methods, such as public policy analysis, social documents analysis, and secondary data analysis of quantitative and qualitative data.
Findings:
A number of issues concerning the implementation of evidence-based disability policy in Romania have been identified. Some of these issues are related to the administrative and policy capacity of the government. Others are linked to the limitation of the advocacy capacity of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) active in the disability area, or to the weak presence of the academic/research community in the disability policy forum.
Discussion and conclusions:
There is a limited knowledge of how evidence-based disability policy is developed in CEE countries. This article will emphasise the role of the sheltered workshops in shaping the policy solutions in the area of work integration for persons with disabilities. The article will contribute to better understanding of the disability policy reform, looking closely at how the evidence is built and used within the disability policy process.
-
Achitei, A., Munteanu, M., Marian, R., Iftimoaiei, M. and Drelea, A. (2014) Social Economy Development Through Accredited Protected Units (Dezvoltarea Economiei Sociale Prin Unitati Protejate Autorizate), Iasi: Alaturi de Voi Foundation.
-
Amin, A. (ed) (2009) The Social Economy: International Perspectives on Economic Solidarity, London and New York: Zed Books.
-
ANPD (Autoritatea Nationala pentru Persoanele cu Dizabilitati) (2018) Raport de Activitate cu Privire la Unităţile Protejate Autorizate în Perioada 03.05.2007 – 31.12.2018 Aferent Anului 2018, Bucharest: Autoritatea Nationala pentru Persoanele cu Dizabilitati, http://anpd.gov.ro/web/informatii-utile/unitati-protejate-autorizate/rapoarte-de-activitate/
-
ANPD (Autoritatea Nationala pentru Persoanele cu Dizabilitati) (2020) Statistics on persons with disabilities, http://anpd.gov.ro/web/transparenta/statistici/trimestriale/
-
Banks, G. (2009) Evidence-based policy making: What is it? How do we get it? ANU Public Lecture Series, 4 February, Productivity Commission, Canberra, https://www.pc.gov.au/news-media/speeches/cs20090204/20090204-evidence-based-policy.pdf (Accessed 17 August 2020)
-
Boruch, R. and Ning, R. (2008) From randomized controlled trials to evidence grading schemes: current state of evidence-based practice in social sciences, Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 1(1): 41–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2008.00004.x
-
Borzaga, C. and Defourny, J. (eds) (2001) The Emergence of Social Enterprise, London: Routledge.
-
Bouckaert, G. (1993) Measurement and meaningful management, Public Productivity and Management Review, 17(1): 31–43. doi: 10.2307/3381047
-
Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J., Nakrošis, V., Hajnal, G. and Tõnnisson, K. (eds) (2008) Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava: Nispacee Press.
-
CDS T & CO (Centrul de Dezvoltare Socială T & CO) (2019) Ocuparea persoanelor cu dizabilităţi: un răspuns la deficitul forţei de muncă, https://www.pro-pact.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PRO-PACT-POLITICA-PUBLICA-AUGUST-2019.pdf
-
Dan, S. and Pollitt, C. (2014) NPM can work: an optimistic review of the impact of new public management reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Public Management Review, 17(9): 1305–32. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.908662
-
Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (eds) (2008) Social Enterprise in Europe: Recent Trends and Developments, EMES Working Papers 08/01, Liège: European Research Network.
-
Donaldson, S.I., Christina, A.C. and Melvin, M.M. (eds) (2009) What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice?, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Drechsler, W. (2009) The rise and demise of the new public management: lessons and opportunities for South East Europe, Central European Public Administration Review, 7(3): 7–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v7i3.131
-
Gidron, B. and Monnickendam-Givon, Y. (2016) A social welfare perspective of market-oriented social enterprises, International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(2): 127–40, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12232
-
Greve, B. (2009) The labour market situation of disabled people in European countries and implementation of employment policies: a summary of evidence from country reports and research studies, Leeds, UK: Academic Network of European Disability Experts (ANED). Available at: https://www.disability-europe.net/downloads/276-aned-task-6-final-report-final-version-17-04-09.
-
Hatry, H. (1999) Performance Management: Getting Results, Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
-
Head, B.W. (2008) Three lenses of evidence-based policy, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
-
Head, B.W. (2015) Towards more ‘evidence-informed’ policymaking?, Public Administration Review, 76(3): 472–84. doi: 10.1111/puar.12475
-
Heinrich, C.J. (2002) Outcome based performance management in the public sector: implications for government accountability and effectiveness, Public Administration Review, 62(6): 712–25. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00253
-
Heinrich, C.J. (2007) Evidence-based policy and performance management: challenges and prospects in two parallel movements, American Review of Public Administration, 37(3): 255–77. doi: 10.1177/0275074007301957
-
Hintea, C. (2008) Public management reforms: Romania, in G. Bouckaert, J. Nemec, V. Nakrosis, G. Hajnal, and K. Tonnisson (eds) Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava, Slovakia: Nispacee Press, pp 271–86.
-
Jennings Jr., E.T. and Hall, J.L. (2012) Evidence-based practice and the use of information in state agency decision making, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2): 245–66. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur040
-
Lambru, M. and Petrescu, C. (2019) Social Enterprises and Their Ecosystems in Europe. Updated Country Report: Romania, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?advSearchKey=socnteco&mode=advancedSubmit&catId=22&doc_submit=&policyArea=0&policyAreaSub=0&country=0&year=0.
-
Lawson, A. and Beckett, A.E. (2020) The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis, International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2): 348–79. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533.
-
Lindblom, C. (1979) Still muddling, not yet through, Public Administration Review, 39(6): 517–26.
-
Lunt, N. and Thorton, P. (1994) Disability and employment: towards an understanding of discourse and policy, Disability and Society, 9(2): 223–38. doi: 10.1080/09687599466780231
-
Majone, G. (1989) Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Matei, L. (2009) Romanian Public Management Reform, vol. 1: Administration and Public Services, Bucharest: Editura Economica.
-
Nemec, J. and de Vries, M.S. (2012) Public Sector Dynamics in Central and Eastern Europe, Bratislava: Nispacee Press.
-
Nesta (2011) Evidence for Social Policy and Practice. Perspectives on How Research and Evidence Can Influence Decision Making in Public Services, London: Nesta, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/evidence_for_social_policy_and_practice.pdf, (Accessed 18 August 2020).
-
Oliver, K., Lorenc, T. and Innvaer, S. (2014) New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature, Health Research Policy and Systems, 12(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-34
-
Pandelea, S. and Mieczkowski, R. (2015) From local clientelism to populism: the case of Radu Mazăre, Annales UMCS, Politologia, 22(1): 23–29, http://dlibra.umcs.lublin.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=26603&from=publication, (Accessed 23 August 2020)
-
Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
-
Peters, G.B. (2008) (ed) Mixes, Matches and Mistakes: New Public Management in Russia and the Former Soviet Republics, Budapest: Open Society Institute.
-
Petrescu, C. (2019) Achiziții rezervate: provocări, tendințe, oportunități, https://www.clnr.ro/raport-achizitii-rezervate-provocari-tendinte-oportunitati/
-
Phillips, S.D. (2012) EU disability policy and implications of EU accession for disability rights in education and employment in Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and the former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22(4): 208–19. doi: 10.1177/1044207311414710
-
Profiroiu, A., Andrei, T., Nica, M. and Ștefănescu, E.D. (2010) Analysis of the national modernizers network for the support of the public administration reform from Romania, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 31E: 114–32.
-
Radin, B. (2006) Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
-
Sanderson, I. (2002) Evaluation, policy learning, and evidence-based policymaking, Public Administration, 80(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292
-
Sanderson, I. (2003) Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policymaking, Research Papers in Education, 18(4): 331–45. doi: 10.1080/0267152032000176846
-
SAR (Romanian Academic Society) (2009) Diagnosis: Excluded from the Labor Market: Barriers to Employment for People with Disabilities in Romania (Diagnostic: Exclus de pe piata muncii. Piedici în ocuparea persoanelor cu dizabilitati în România), Bucharest: Alpha Media Print.
-
SAR (Romanian Academic Society) and Motivation Foundation Romania (2010) Accesul la Piata Muncii Redus Pentru Persoanele cu Dizabilitati, Buzau: Alpha MDN.
-
Sepulveda, L. (2015) Social enterprise: a new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare?, Social Policy and Administration, 49(7): 842–61, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12106
-
Shima, I. and Rodrigues, R. (2009) The Implementation of EU Social Inclusion and Social Protection Strategies in European Countries with Reference to Equality for Disabled People: Leeds, UK: Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED). Available at: https://www.disability-europe.net/downloads/277-aned-task-7-report-social-inclusion-final-20-05-09.
-
Sinecka, J. (2009) The Czech Republic: report on the current state of disability law and policy, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19(4): 195–203. doi: 10.1177/1044207308314947
-
Stark, D. and Bruszt, L. (1998) Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Teasdale, S. (2012) What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses, Public Policy and Administration, 27(2): 99–115. doi: 10.1177/0952076711401466
-
Thijs, N. and Hammerschmid, G. (2018) Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Romania, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
-
Verheijen, A.J.G. (2000) Administrative capacity building for EU membership: a race against time? Scientific Council for Government Policy Working Documents 107, The Hague: WRR.
-
Verheijen, A.J.G. (2003) Public administration in post-communist states, in G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds) Handbook of Public Administration, London: Sage, pp 489–98.
-
Verheijen, T. and Dobrolyubova, Y. (2007) Performance management in the Baltic States and Russia: success against the odds?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2): 205–21. doi: 10.1177/0020852307077966
-
Waddington, L. and Priestley, M. (2020) A human rights approach to disability assessment, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(1): 1–15, doi: 10.1017/ics.2020.21
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 394 | 394 | 36 |
| Full Text Views | 59 | 58 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 19 | 18 | 0 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk