Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Disability and family violence prevention: a case study on participation in evidence making

Authors:
Sally RobinsonFlinders University, Australia

Search for other papers by Sally Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
kylie valentineUniversity of New South Wales, Australia

Search for other papers by kylie valentine in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Jan IdleFlinders University, Australia

Search for other papers by Jan Idle in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Background:

The paper draws on empirical evidence from a project investigating service responses to disabled women and children experiencing domestic and family violence (DFV). Service provision in these sectors is often rationed due to resource constraints, and increasingly marketised, and disabled people often do not have their needs met. Their opportunities for participation in policy and practice are also constrained.

Aims and objectives:

Our aim is to bring critical studies of intersectionality into dialogue with ‘evidence-making’ scholarship on policy implementation, to allow for new analyses of the inclusion of lived experience expertise in policy.

We ask:

What are the potential drivers for new forms of practice and evidence making in policy and service settings?

Methods:

The multi-method study comprised literature and policy review and qualitative research about the experience and implementation of an early intervention violence prevention support programme. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with mothers (n=27) and children (n=7), and service providers (n=28).

Findings:

Many mothers did not identify as disabled, although they discussed the effects of impairment. However, children were all diagnosed, and diagnosis was a means of accessing funding and services. The service was focused on brokering responses to family needs, and formal participation mechanisms for clients were not prioritised.

Discussion and conclusion:

Resource constraints and workforce capacity are ongoing concerns in the disability and violence prevention sectors. Relationships that facilitate trust, agency and choice remain key. Insights from critical policy scholarship suggest opportunities to recognise existing relationships as participation, with implications for policy and practice.

  • Abrams, T. and Gibson, B.E. (2017) Putting Gino’s lesson to work: actor–network theory, enacted humanity, and rehabilitation, Health, 21(4): 42540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arnstein, S.R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 21624. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DSS (Australian Government Department of Social Security) (nd) National disability representative organizations, https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/disability-and-carers/program-services/consultation-and-advocacy/national-disability-peak-bodies#:~:text=The%20disability%20peak%20bodies%20are,range%20of%20ministers%20and%20portfolios.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2019) Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia: continuing the national story, (Cat. no. DFV 3), https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/b0037b2d-a651-4abf-9f7b-00a85e3de528/aihw-DFV3-FDSV-in-Australia-2019.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Avery, S. (2018) Culture is Inclusion: A Narrative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People with Disability, Sydney: First Peoples Disability Network.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bloomkamp, E. (2018) The promise of co-design for public policy, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4): 72943. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12310

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowen, E. and Swift, C. (2019) The prevalence and correlates of partner violence used and experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and call to action, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 20(5): 693705. doi: 10.1177/1524838017728707

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Breckenridge, J. and Huppert, S. (2010) Keeping Children with A Disability Safely in Their Families: Intensive Family Support Programs, Sydney: UNSW Centre for Gender-Related Violence Studies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castrolade, M.A. (2018) Mobilizing dis/ability research: a critical discussion of qualitative go-along interviews in practice, Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1): 4555. doi: 10.1177/1077800417727765

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K.W. and McCall, L. (2013) Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4): 785810. doi: 10.1086/669608

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collings, S., Strnadová, I., Loblinzk, J. and Danker, J. (2019) Benefits and limits of peer support for mothers with intellectual disability affected by domestic violence and child protection, Disability and Society, 35(3): 41334. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1647150

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Council of Australian Governments (2009) National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children 2010–2022 https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/08_2014/national_plan1.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 124199. doi: 10.2307/1229039

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De’Ath, S., Flynn, C. and Field-Pimm, M. (2018) Building knowledge of consumer participation in criminal justice in Australia: a case study, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 7(1): 7690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dean, R.J. (2017) Beyond radicalism and resignation: the competing logics for public participation in policy decisions, Policy & Politics, 45(2): 21330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dobson, R. (2020) Local government and practice ontologies: agency, resistance and sector speaks in homelessness services, Local Government Studies, 46(4): 583603. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1729748

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dyson, S., Frawley, P. and Robinson, S. (2017) ‘Whatever it Takes’: Access for Women with Disabilities to Domestic and Domestic Violence Services, Final Report, Sydney: ANROWS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feely, M. (2016) Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism, Disability and Society, 31(7): 86383. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fraser-Barbour, E., Crocker, R. and Walker, R. (2018) Barriers and facilitators in supporting people with intellectual disability to report sexual violence: perspectives of Australian disability and mainstream support providers, Journal of Adult Protection, 20(1): 516. doi: 10.1108/JAP-08-2017-0031

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G. and Iversen, O.S. (2014) In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design, International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 74: 93106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hammock, J. (2019) The practice of participation and the capability approach, in D.A. Clark, M. Biggeri and A.A. Frediani (eds) The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation Concepts, Methods and Applications, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Howe, K. and Hargrave, J. (2016) Choice, control and safety: the Royal Commission sends the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) a message on violence, Parity, 29(4): 2021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, L., Bellis, M.A., Wood, S., Hughes, K., McCoy, E., Eckley, L., Bates, G., Mikton, C., Shakespeare, T. and Officer, A. (2012) Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, The Lancet, 380(9845): 899907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60692-8

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kayess, R., Sands, T. and Fisher, K.R. (2014) International power and local action: implications for the intersectionality of the rights of women with disability, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(3): 38396. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12092

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lancaster, K., Seear, K., Treloar, C. and Ritter, A. (2017) The productive techniques and constitutive effects of ‘evidence-based policy’ and ‘consumer participation’ discourses in health policy processes, Social Science and Medicine, 176: 608. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.031

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nind, M. and Vinha, H. (2014) Doing research inclusively: bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2): 1029. doi: 10.1111/bld.12013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olney, S. and Dickinson, H. (2019) Australia’s new national disability insurance scheme: implications for policy and practice, Policy Design and Practice, 2(3): 27590. doi: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1586083

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ottman, G.F. and Laragy, C. (2010) Developing consumer-directed care for people with a disability: 10 lessons for user participation in health and community care policy and program development, Australian Health Review, 34(4): 39094. doi: 10.1071/AH09759

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rhodes, T. and Lancaster, K. (2019) Evidence-making interventions in health: a conceptual framing, Social Science and Medicine, 238: 212. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112488

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richards, L. and Morse, J.M. (2013) A User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Robinson, S., valentine, k., Newton, B.J., Smyth, C. and Parmenter, N. (2020) Violence prevention and early intervention for mothers and children with disability: building promising practice (978-1-925925-46-3), https://www.anrows.org.au/project/mothers-and-children-with-disability-using-early-intervention-services-identifying-and-sharing-promising-practice/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017) A brief guide to the Final Report: Disability, https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/a_brief_guide_to_the_final_report_-_disability.pdfAugust 5, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shakespeare, T. (2013) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited, London: Routledge.

  • Shaw, L.R., Chan, F. and McMahon, B.T. (2012) Intersectionality and disability harassment: the interactive effects of disability, race, age, gender, Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 55(2): 8291. doi: 10.1177/0034355211431167

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shier, H. (2006) Models for youth participation, Connect, 160(18).

  • Stubbs, J. (2015) Gendered violence, intersectionalities and resisting gender neutrality, Onati Socio-Legal Studies, 5(6): 143345.

  • Tayton, S., Moore, S., Campo, M. and Kaspiew, R. (2014) Groups and communities at risk of domestic and family violence: a review and evaluation of domestic and family violence prevention and early intervention services focusing on at-risk groups and communities, https://aifs.gov.au/publications/groups-and-communities-risk-domestic-and-family-violence.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thill, C. (2019) Listening for intersectionality: how disabled persons’ organisations have improved recognition of difference in Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme, in O. Hankivsky and J.S. Jordan-Zachery (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy, Cham: Springer International, pp 689704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, C. (2004) Rescuing a social relational understanding of disability, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1): 2236. doi: 10.1080/15017410409512637

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tisdall, E.K.M. (2017) Conceptualising children and young people’s participation: examining vulnerability, social accountability and co-production, International Journal of Human Rights, 21(1): 5975. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2016.1248125

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.

  • UN (United Nations) (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol, https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.

  • valentine, K., Persson, A., Newman, C. E., Hamilton, M., Bryant, J. and Wallace, J. (2020) ‘Experience as evidence: the prospects for biographical narratives in drug policy’, Contemporary Drug Problems, 47(3): 191209. doi: 10.1177/0091450920916244

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Sally RobinsonFlinders University, Australia

Search for other papers by Sally Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
kylie valentineUniversity of New South Wales, Australia

Search for other papers by kylie valentine in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Jan IdleFlinders University, Australia

Search for other papers by Jan Idle in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 647 649 52
Full Text Views 116 116 3
PDF Downloads 79 79 4

Altmetrics

Dimensions