The evidence-based policy movement and political idealism

Author:
Jesper Ahlin Marceta KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for other papers by Jesper Ahlin Marceta in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

The opposing views in the scholarly debate on evidence-based policy (EBP) have recently been labeled ‘rationalist’ and ‘constructivist’, where the former are positive to EBP and the latter are not. This framing of the debate is suboptimal, as it conflates critical positions that should be kept separate. This article suggests that the debate should be understood as one between idealists, realists, and counter-idealists about EBP. The realist position, that is, that EBP is difficult or impossible to achieve in practice, has already been treated at length in the debate. The conflict between idealism and counter-idealism, to the contrary, has been neglected. This article aims to stimulate the scholarly debate on EBP by initiating a principled discussion between idealism and counter-idealism about EBP, which should motivate proponents of EBP to formulate their ideal with substantial moral arguments. This places the debate on EBP in the context of normative political theory, where it rightfully belongs.

  • Albæk, E. (1995) Between knowledge and power: utilization of social science in public policy making, Policy Sciences, 28(1): 79100.

  • Arvan, M. (2014) First steps toward a nonideal theory of justice, Ethics & Global Politics, 7(3): 95117.

  • Bird, S.M., Goldacre, B. and Strang, J. (2011) We should push for evidence based sentencing in criminal justice, BMJ, 342: d612. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d612

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Botterill, L.C. (2017) Evidence-based policy, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Botterill, L.C. and Hindmoor, A. (2012) Turtles all the way down: bounded rationality in an evidence-based age, Policy Studies, 33(5): 36779. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2011.626315

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cairney, P. (2016) The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Cairney, P. (2017) The politics of evidence-based policymaking, Oxford Research Encyclopedia, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.268

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duncan, S. (2005) Towards evidence-inspired policy making, Social Sciences, 61(1): 1011.

  • Erman, E. and Möller, N. (2019) A world of possibilities: the place of feasibility in political theory, Res Publica, doi: 10.1007/s11158-018-09415-y

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estlund, D. (2014) Utopophobia, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42: 11334. doi: 10.1111/papa.12031

  • Estlund, D. (2016) Reply to Wiens, European Journal of Political Theory, 15(3): 35362. doi: 10.1177/1474885115602369

  • Farrelly, C. (2007) Justice in ideal theory: a refutation, Political Studies, 55(4): 84464.

  • French, R.D. (2018) Lessons from the evidence on evidence-based policy, Canadian Public Administration, 61(3): 42542. doi: 10.1111/capa.12295

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamlin, A. and Stemplowska, Z. (2012) Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals, Political Studies Review, 10: 4862. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00244.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haynes, L., Service, O., Goldacre, B. and Torgerson, D. (2012) Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials, Policy Paper, Cabinet Office, London.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Head, B.W. (2010) Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges, Policy and Society, 29(2): 7794. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jebari, K. (2019) Vad är evidensbaserad policy?, manuscript.

  • Levy, J.T. (2016) There is no such thing as ideal theory, Social Philosophy and Policy, 33(1–2): 31233. doi: 10.1017/S026505251600025X

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Luton, L.S. (2007) Deconstructing public administration empiricism, Administration & Society, 39(4): 52744. doi: 10.1177/0095399707303813

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Migone, A.R. and Brock, K.L. (2017) Canadian Public Administration, 60(3): 36996. doi: 10.1111/capa.12224

  • Mills, C. (2005) ‘Ideal theory’ as ideology, Hypatia, 20(3): 16584.

  • Newman, J. (2017) Deconstructing the debate over evidence-based policy, Critical Policy Studies, 11(2): 21126. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2016.1224724

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nutley, S.M., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007) Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • O’Neill, O. (1987) Abstraction, idealization and ideology in ethics, in J.D.G. Evans (ed) Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 5569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Östbring, B. (2019) Migrationspolitiska Dilemman: Om Idealism Och Realism I Liberal Politisk Teori, PhD thesis, Lund: Lund University.

  • Pearce, W., Wessenlink, A. and Colebatch, H. (2014) Evidence and meaning in policy making, Evidence & Policy, 10(2): 16165.

  • Sanderson, I. (2009) Intelligent policy making for a complex world: pragmatism, evidence and learning, Political Studies, 57(4): 699719. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00791.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sen, A. (2006) What do we want from a theory of justice?, Journal of Philosophy, 103: 21538. doi: 10.5840/jphil2006103517

  • Simmons, J. (2010) Ideal and nonideal theory, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38: 536.

  • Southwood, N. (2016) Does ‘ought’ imply ‘feasible’?, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44: 745.

  • Standring, A. (2017) Evidence-based policymaking and the politics of neoliberal reason: a response to Newman, Critical Policy Studies, 11(2): 22734. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1304226

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stoker, G. and Evans, M. (2016) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences, Bristol: Policy Press.

  • Strassheim, H. (2017) Bringing the political back in: reconstructing the debate over evidence-based policy: a response to Newman, Critical Policy Studies, 11(2): 23545. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1323656

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Valentini, L. (2012) Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: a conceptual map, Philosophy Compass, 7: 65464. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weingart, P. (2003) Paradox of scientific advising, in G. Bechmann and I. Hronszky (eds) Expertise and Its Interfaces: The Tense Relationship of Science and Politics, Berlin: Editions Sigma, pp 5389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiens, D. (2015) Against ideal guidance, Journal of Politics, 77(2): 43346. doi: 10.1086/679495

  • Wiens, D. (2016) Motivational limits on the demands of justice, European Journal of Political Theory, 15(3): 33352. doi: 10.1177/1474885115578446

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wiens, D. (2018) Rejoinder to Estlund, manuscript.

Jesper Ahlin Marceta KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for other papers by Jesper Ahlin Marceta in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 948 552 58
Full Text Views 733 78 1
PDF Downloads 301 38 1

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice