Knowing what we are talking about: why evidence doesn't always travel

Author:
Nancy Cartwright Department of Philosophy, Durham University, UK

Search for other papers by Nancy Cartwright in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

When is a well-established study result that a given policy/programme/treatment produced a given outcome in a particular study setting (‘there’) evidence that that policy/programme/ treatment will produce that outcome in a new setting (‘here’)? This paper insists that ‘there’ and ‘here’ be firmly distinguished and offers in answer that we must have evidence that two further facts obtain: (a) that the policy can play the same causal role widely (widely enough to cover both here and there) and (b) that a complete set of the support factors necessary for the policy to operate here are present in some individuals here.

Nancy Cartwright Department of Philosophy, Durham University, UK

Search for other papers by Nancy Cartwright in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1146 648 24
Full Text Views 219 94 14
PDF Downloads 311 162 24

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice