Is it time to drop the term ‘prostitution’ from policy discourse?
In this paper, I wish to explore whether it is time to drop the use of the term ‘prostitution’ in English policy discourse. I argue here that ‘prostitution’ is a culturally loaded term and is insufficiently precise in describing the different contexts in which the exchange of sex for money or other resources between adults takes place. This lack of clarity has implications for policy action, which in turn materially affects the lives of those involved in the sex industry. I draw on thesis of the eroticisation of dominance as a productive framework for explaining why violence, harm and coercion are possible within the exchange of sex for money (or other resource), though not inevitable. I propose that we distinguish four categories: sex entrepreneurship, sex work, survival sex and sexual exploitation. For some scholars, such categorisations overlook how disparate practices are connected (), most obviously by patriarchy or economic inequality. However, I believe we need to see both the connections and the distinctions: if we conflate different practices, we lose the particularity of the contexts of practice and weaken the rationale for policy action. Worse, policy interventions may be harmful. I suggest these four categories can help us identify and distinguish between structural and interpersonal harm and structural and interpersonal coercion and help to formulate attendant criminal justice and social justice measures.
-
Coy, M. (2017) Prostitution in (and out of) policy on violence against women and girls in the UK, Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1): 117–26. doi: 10.1332/239868017X14896674831478
-
Hester, M., Natasha, M., Matolcsi, A., Lana Sanchez, A. and Walker, S.-J. (2019) The nature and prevalence of prostitution and sex work in England and Wales today, London: Home Office.
-
Hughes, D.M. (1999) Pimps and predators on the internet: Globalizing the sexual exploitation of women and children, Kingston, R.I.: The Coalition Against Trafficking in Women.
-
Jeffreys, S. (2009) The industrial vagina (RIPE Series in global political economy), Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Kelly, L. (1987) The continuum of sexual violence, In J. Hanmer, M. Maynard (eds), Women, violence and social control: explorations in sociology (British Sociological Association Conference Volume series), London: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Lanau Sanchez, A. and Matolcsi, A. (under review) Sex work and prostitution: Who counts?
-
Lister, K. (2017) Sex workers or prostitutes? Why words matter, [online] London: iNews, https://inews.co.uk/opinion/columnists/sex-workers-prostitutes-words-matter/
-
MacKinnon, C. (1989) Toward a feminist theory of state, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Mulvihill, N. (2018) The criminalisation of paying for sex in England and Wales: how gender and power are implicated in the making of policy, Journal of Public Policy, 38(2): 165–189. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X16000295
-
Mulvihill, N. (forthcoming) Should real love hurt? The eroticisation of dominance, submission and coercive control in contemporary pop music, In G. Fosbraey, N. Puckey (eds), Misogyny, toxic masculinity, and heteronormativity in post-2000 popular music, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Niemi, J. (2010) What we talk about when we talk about buying sex, Violence Against Women, 16(2): 159–72. doi: 10.1177/1077801209355239
| May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 157 | 157 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 26 | 26 | 3 |
| PDF Downloads | 29 | 29 | 2 |
We are a leading social science publisher
committed to making a difference.
Bristol University Press and
Policy Press
bristoluniversitypress.co.uk