Domestic violence perpetrator programmes are a frequently used intervention to respond to perpetrators of domestic violence. However, there is considerable concern about the use of ‘online’, ‘virtual’, or ‘digital’ programmes delivered remotely. Policy and practice have developed at pace through the COVID-19 pandemic and research is lacking. This exploratory research examined the challenges and opportunities associated with a pilot online programme in Minnesota, US, for court mandated men. It took place before the COVID-19 pandemic, making it the first study to investigate a ‘live’ online programme.
A mixed method design was used, consisting of 40 hours of observational data (covering 25 sessions); four interviews with programme facilitators, 12 interviews with programme observers, and six perpetrators enrolled on the programme. We did not investigate the experiences of partners or ex-partners or of partner organisations, which is a limitation.
We found that while the online format solved some long-established issues with programme delivery (for example, providing an intervention for rural communities, a lack of transport, continuity of intervention for those who travel as part of their job), different issues arose in connection to the online programme. These problems included access to necessary broadband speeds, technical hardware and a private place to participate in the sessions.
Archibald, M.M., Ambagtsheer, R.C. and Casey, M.G. (2019) Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1177/1609406919874596
Bellini, R., Forrest, S., Westmarland, N., Jackson, D. and Smeddinck, J.D. (2020a) Choice-point: fostering awareness and choice with perpetrators in domestic violence interventions, CHI ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu: Association for Computing Machinery: 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376386.
Bellini, R., Forrest, S., Westmarland, N. and Smeddinck, J.D. (2020b) Mechanisms of moral responsibility: rethinking technologies for domestic violence prevention work, CHI ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu: Association for Computing Machinery: 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376693.
Blackburn, S., Brownsell, S. and Hawley, M. S. (2011) A systematic review of digital interactive television systems and their applications in the health and social care fields, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(4): 168–76. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.100610.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. and Hampson, R. (2009) Family Violence Prevention Foundation of Australia, 2009: An Evaluation of Interventions with Domestic Violence Perpetrators, Melbourne: Monash University.
Cannon, C., Hamel, J., Buttell, F. and Ferreira, R.J. (2020) The Pursuit of Research-supported Treatment in Batterer Intervention: The Role of Professional Licensure and Theoretical Orientation for Duluth and CBT Programs, Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 17:4, 469–85. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2020.1775744.
Coy, M., Kelly, L. and Foord, J. (2009) Map of Gaps 2: The Postcode Lottery of Violence Against Women Support Services in Britain, London: End Violence Against Women Coalition.
DeKeseredy, W.S. (2020) Woman Abuse in Rural Places, London: Routledge.
Devaney, J. and Lazenbatt, A. (2016) Domestic Violence Perpetrators - Evidence informed responses, London: Routledge.
Donovan, C. and Griffiths, S. (2015) Domestic violence and voluntary perpetrator programmes: engaging men in the pre-commencement phase, British Journal of Social Work, 45(4): 1155–71. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct182
Drive Partnership (2020) A Domestic Abuse Perpetrator Strategy for England And Wales, London: Respect UK.
Gondolf, E.W. (2012) The Future of Batterer Programs, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R.H., Chang, V. and Morales, M. (2014) Attrition in MOOC: Lessons Learned from Drop-Out Students, in Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, Y.H. and Liberona, D. (eds) Learning Technology for Education in Cloud: MOOC and Big Data, LTEC 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 446: 37–48, Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4.
Hester, M., Eisenstat, N., Ortega-Avila, A., Morgan, K., Walker, S.J. and Bell, J. (2019) Evaluation of the Drive Project: A Three-year Pilot to Address High-risk, High-harm Perpetrators of Domestic Abuse, Bristol: University of Bristol.
Hodder, A. (2020) New technology, work and employment in the era of COVID-19: reflecting on legacies of research, New Technology, Work and Development, 35(3): 262–75. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12173
Hoffman, D., Novak, T. and Schlosser, A. E. (2001) The Evolution of the Digital Divide: Examining the Relationship of Race to Internet Access and Usage Over Time. The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth?, MIT Press: Cambridge, pp. 47–97.
Humphreys, C. and Stanley, N. (2015) Domestic Violence and Protecting Children: New Thinking and Approaches, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jamieson, S. and Mikko Vesala, K. (2008) Exploring men’s perpetrator programs in small rural communities, Rural Sociology, 18(1): 39–50. doi: 10.5172/rsj.351.18.1.39
Jun, J. (2005) Understanding E-dropout?, International Journal on E-Learning, Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 4(2): 229–40.
Kelly, L. and Westmarland, N. (2015) Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: Steps Towards Change. Project Mirabal Final Report, London and Durham: London Metropolitan University and Durham University.
Lilley-Walker, S.-J., Hester, M. and Turner, W. (2018) Evaluation of European Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: Toward a Model for Designing and Reporting Evaluations Related to Perpetrator Treatment Interventions, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(4): 868–84. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16673853.
Marcoux, R. M. and Vogenberg, F.R. (2016) Telehealth: Applications From a Legal and Regulatory Perspective, Pharmacy and Therapeutics: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 41(9): 567–70.
McGinn, T., McColgan, M. and Taylor, B. (2020) Male IPV perpetrator’s perspectives on intervention and change: a systematic synthesis of qualitative studies, Trauma Violence and Abuse, 21(1): 97–112. doi: 10.1177/1524838017742167
Miller, S. (2010) Discussing the duluth curriculum: creating a process of change for men who batter, Violence Against Women, 16(9): 1007–21. doi: 10.1177/1077801210379318
Pence, E. and Paymar, M. (1993) Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Phillips, R., Kelly, L. and Westmarland, N. (2013) Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: An Historical Overview, London: London Metropolitan University.
Rempel, E., Donelle, L., Hall, J., Rodger, S. (2018) Intimate partner violence: a review of online interventions, Informatics for Health and Social Care, 44(2): 204–19. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2018.1433675.
Rutter, A. and O’Connor, T. (2015) The Evaluation of the Online Men’s Behaviour Change Program: Trial 2 – Report, Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Scaia, M., Connelly, L. and Downing, J. (2007) Addressing Fatherhood with Men Who Batter Curriculum Package, Duluth, MN: Advocates for Family Peace.
Simpson, S. (2005) Therapy via videoconferencing: a route to client empowerment?, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12(2): 156–65. doi: 10.1002/cpp.436.
Solove, D.J. (2013) Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma, 126 Harvard Law Review 1880, Paper No. 2012-141, GWU Law School.
Strang, H., Sherman, L., Ariel, B. et al (2017) Reducing the harm of intimate partner violence: randomised controlled trial of the hampshire constabulary CARA experiment, Cambridge Journal of Evidence Based Policing, 1(2–3): 160–73. doi: 10.1007/s41887-017-0007-x
Suler, J. R. (2000) Psychotherapy in Cyberspace: A 5-Dimensional Model of Online and Computer-Mediated Psychotherapy, Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 3(2): 151–9. doi: 10.1089/109493100315996.
Vlais, R., Ridley, S., Green, D. and Chung, D. (2017) Family and Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: Issues Paper of Current and Emerging Trends, Developments and Expectations, Melbourne: Stopping Family Violence Inc.
Vlais, R. and Campbell, E. (2020) Alternative delivery formats for domestic and family violence perpetrator programs in the COVID-19 situation, RMIT Centre for Innovative Justice.
Westmarland, N. and Kelly, L. (2013) Why extending measurements of ‘success’ in domestic violence perpetrator programmes matters for social work, British Journal of Social Work, 43(6): 1092–110. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs049
Westmarland, N., Kelly, L. and Chalder-Mills, J. (2010) Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: What Counts as Success?, Durham and London: Durham University and London Metropolitan University.
White, J.W. and Sienkiewicz, H.C. (2018) Victim empowerment, safety, and perpetrator accountability through collaboration: a crisis to transformation conceptual model, Violence against Women, 24(14): 1678–96. doi: 10.1177/1077801217743341
Wistow, R., Kelly, L. and Westmarland, N. (2017) ‘Time out’: a strategy for reducing men’s violence against women in relationships?, Violence Against Women, 23(6): 730–48. doi: 10.1177/1077801216647944
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 337 | 337 | 45 |
Full Text Views | 107 | 107 | 2 |
PDF Downloads | 114 | 114 | 3 |