Beyond the angers of populism: a psychosocial inquiry

Barry Richards Bournemouth University, UK

Search for other papers by Barry Richards in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

This article offers a model of psychosocial inquiry in an analysis of the sources of the passionate desire for the UK to leave the EU. It proceeds from separate consideration of the ‘monocular’ modes of both societally- and psychologically-focussed approaches, towards bringing them together in a more ‘binocular’ vision. Firstly, familiar societal explanations are considered, in the perceived losses of material security, of national sovereignty and of indigenous community. It is noted that this level of explanation cannot account for the variations amongst Leave-supporting individuals in the intensity of their anger with the ‘establishment’. Secondly, a depth-psychological approach is explored, noting the contribution of theories of ‘othering’ and focussing on how pro-Brexit anger can be understood as a narcissistic rage against the ‘otherness’ of authority, as represented both by Parliament and the British elites, and by European institutions. Thirdly, a psychosocial ‘binocularity’ is outlined, in which societally-generated anxieties can be seen to interact with the intra-psychic vector of the narcissistic defence. That defence in turn can be seen to have become more prominent in late-modern societies due to cultural changes which have impacted adversely on the capacity for basic trust, so in historical context the psychic dimension folds back into the societal.

  • Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018) National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. London: Pelican.

  • Erikson, E. (1950) Childhood and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.

  • Fromm, E. (1942) The fear of freedom. London: Ark Paperbacks, 1984.

  • Giddens, A. (1990) The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Goodhart, D. (2017) The road to somewhere. London: Penguin.

  • Gove, M. (2016) Interview, Sky News, 3 June.

  • Greenberg, J. & Mitchell, S. (1983) Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Guntrip, H. (1971) Psychoanalytic theory, therapy and the self. London: Karnac, 1977.

  • Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. (1956) Aspects of Sociology. London: Heinemann, 1973.

  • Lasch, C. (1978) The Culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton.

  • Lloyd, J. (2004) What the Media are Doing to our Politics. London: Constable.

  • Miscoiu, S. (2013) From populism to neo-populism? Empirical guidelines for a conceptual delineation. In Soare, S., Miscoiu, S. & Ghergina, S., eds., Contemporary Populism: A Controversial Concept and its Diverse Forms. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishra, P. (2017) Age of Anger. A History of the Present. London: Penguin.

  • O’Toole, F. (2018) Heroic Failure. Brexit and the Politics of Pain. London: Head of Zeus.

  • Winnicott, D. (1950) Some thoughts on the meaning of the word ‘democracy’. In Home Is Where We Start From, 239259. London: Penguin, 1986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Barry Richards Bournemouth University, UK

Search for other papers by Barry Richards in
Current site
Google Scholar

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 228 172 11
Full Text Views 33 9 2
PDF Downloads 52 21 1



You are not currently authorised to access the full text of this chapter or article.
Access options
To access the full chapter or article then please choose one of the options below.
Pay to access content (PDF download and unlimited online access)
Other access options
Redeem Token
Institutional Login
Log in via Open Athens or Shibboleth. Please contact your librarian if you need any help.
Login with Institutional Access
Personal Login
Login to your BUP account with your individual credentials.
Login with BUP account

Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here