Fit to govern? Comparing citizen and policymaker perceptions of deliberative democratic innovations

Authors:
Vesa Koskimaa Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Search for other papers by Vesa Koskimaa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Lauri Rapeli Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Search for other papers by Lauri Rapeli in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Democratic innovations, such as the introduction of deliberative mini-publics, have attracted increasing attention. The assumption is that involving citizens more directly in policymaking offers a way to address the widespread decline in public trust in the democratic process and traditional forms of engagement, such as voting in elections. While a thriving literature discusses the merits of mini-publics from a citizen perspective, scholars have neglected the views of policymakers. To fill the gap, we draw on two recent surveys conducted in Finland to examine citizens’ and policymakers’ attitudes to mini-publics. The data show that citizens report high levels of trust in the capacity of a deliberative citizen body to produce meaningful policies. However, policymakers are more sceptical about their value. This finding is important because it may well have implications for the willingness of policymakers to create mini-publics and take their recommendations into account.

  • Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J. and Warren, M. (2018) Introduction, in A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge and M. Warren (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, H.S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M. and Laitinen, E. (2016) Demokraattiset innovaatiot Suomessa – Käyttö ja vaikutukset paikallisella ja valtakunnallisella tasolla [Democratic innovations in Finland – use and effects on local and national levels], publications of the government’s analysis, assessment and research activities 56/2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, H.S., Himmelroos, S. and Grönlund, K. (2017a) Does deliberation breed an appetite for discursive participation? Assessing the impact of first-hand experience, Political Studies, 65(1): 6483. doi: 10.1177/0032321715617771

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, H.S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M. and Laitinen, E. (2017b) The Finnish citizens’ initiative: towards inclusive agenda-setting?, Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(4): 41133. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12096

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drummond, A. (2006) Electoral volatility and party decline in Western democracies: 1970–1995, Political Studies, 54(3): 62847. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00617.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ercan, S. and Gagnon, J.P. (2014) The crisis of democracy, which crisis? Which democracy?, Democratic Theory, 1(2): 110. doi: 10.3167/dt.2014.010201

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farrell, D.M., Suiter, J., Harris, C. and Cunningham, K. (2019) The effects of mixed membership in a deliberative forum: the Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014, Political Studies, online first.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fishkin, J.S. and Mansbridge, J. (2017) Introduction, Daedalus, 146(3): 613. doi: 10.1162/DAED_x_00442

  • Geissel, B. and Newton, K. (eds) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, London: Routledge.

  • Goodin, R.E. and Dryzek, J.S. (2006) Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics, Politics & Society, 34(2): 21944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A. and Setälä, M. (2014) Deliberative Mini-publics – Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grönlund, K., Herne, K. and Setälä, M. (2015) Does enclave deliberation polarize opinions?, Political Behavior, 37(4): 9951020.

  • Hendriks, C. and Lees-Marshment, J. (2018) Political leaders and public engagement: the hidden world of informal elite–citizen interaction, Political Studies, 67(3): 597617. doi: 10.1177/0032321718791370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hibbing, J. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy. Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Himmelroos, S., Rapeli, L. and Grönlund, K. (2017) Talking with like-minded people: equality and efficacy in enclave deliberation, The Social Science Journal, 54(2): 14858. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2016.10.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacquet, V. (2019) The role and the future of deliberative mini-publics: a citizen perspective, Political Studies, 67(3): 63957. doi: 10.1177/0032321718794358

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jäske, M. (2019) Participatory innovations and maxi-publics: the influence of participation possibilities on perceived legitimacy at the local level in Finland, European Journal of Political Research, 58(2): 60330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mattila, M. and Raunio, T. (2006) Cautious voters – supportive parties: opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension, European Union Politics, 7(4): 42749. doi: 10.1177/1465116506069434

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLaverty, P. (2009) Is deliberative democracy the answer to representative democracy’s problems? A consideration of the UK government’s programme of citizens’ juries, Representation, 45(4): 37989. doi: 10.1080/00344890903236957

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Michels, A. (2011) Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2): 27593. doi: 10.1177/0020852311399851

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mickelsson, R. (2015) Suomen puolueet – vapauden ajasta maailmantuskaan [Parties in Finland – From an era of freedom to ‘weltschmerz’], Tampere: Vastapaino.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Milner, H. (2002) Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

  • Nabatchi, T. and Farrar, C. (2011) Bridging the Gap Between Public Officials and the Public (DDC), a report of the Deliberative Democracy Consortium, www.racialequitytools.org/resourcefiles/Bridging-the-Gap-between-Public-Officials-and-the-Public—DDC-exec-summary.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neblo, M.A., Esterling, K.M., Kennedy, R.P., Lazer, D.M.J. and Sokhey, A.E. (2010) Who wants to deliberate – and why?, American Political Science Review, 104(3): 56683. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000298

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newton, K. (2012) Curing the democratic malaise with democratic innovations, in K. Newton and B. Geissel (eds) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, London: Routledge, pp 320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Posner, R. (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Posner, R. (2004) Smooth sailing, Legal Affairs, [available from https://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2004/feature_posner_janfeb04.msp, accessed 27 April, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rose, J. (2009) Institutionalizing participation through citizen’s assemblies, in J. DeBardeleben and J. Pammett (eds) Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan, pp 21432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Setälä, M. (2017) Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making, European Journal of Political Research, 56(4): 84663.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Strandberg, K., Grönlund, K. and Himmelroos, S. (2019) Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization, International Political Science Review, 40(1): 4157. doi: 10.1177/0192512117692136

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, S. (2017) Parliaments, constitutional conventions, and popular sovereignty, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2): 32035. doi: 10.1177/1369148117700657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Vesa Koskimaa Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Search for other papers by Vesa Koskimaa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
and
Lauri Rapeli Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Search for other papers by Lauri Rapeli in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1511 790 31
Full Text Views 165 26 2
PDF Downloads 183 38 4

Altmetrics

Dimensions

Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy