Democratic innovations, such as the introduction of deliberative mini-publics, have attracted increasing attention. The assumption is that involving citizens more directly in policymaking offers a way to address the widespread decline in public trust in the democratic process and traditional forms of engagement, such as voting in elections. While a thriving literature discusses the merits of mini-publics from a citizen perspective, scholars have neglected the views of policymakers. To fill the gap, we draw on two recent surveys conducted in Finland to examine citizens’ and policymakers’ attitudes to mini-publics. The data show that citizens report high levels of trust in the capacity of a deliberative citizen body to produce meaningful policies. However, policymakers are more sceptical about their value. This finding is important because it may well have implications for the willingness of policymakers to create mini-publics and take their recommendations into account.
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J. and Warren, M. (2018) Introduction, in A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge and M. Warren (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 1–31.
Christensen, H.S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M. and Laitinen, E. (2016) Demokraattiset innovaatiot Suomessa – Käyttö ja vaikutukset paikallisella ja valtakunnallisella tasolla [Democratic innovations in Finland – use and effects on local and national levels], publications of the government’s analysis, assessment and research activities 56/2016.
Christensen, H.S., Himmelroos, S. and Grönlund, K. (2017a) Does deliberation breed an appetite for discursive participation? Assessing the impact of first-hand experience, Political Studies, 65(1): 64–83. doi: 10.1177/0032321715617771
Christensen, H.S., Jäske, M., Setälä, M. and Laitinen, E. (2017b) The Finnish citizens’ initiative: towards inclusive agenda-setting?, Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(4): 411–33. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12096
Drummond, A. (2006) Electoral volatility and party decline in Western democracies: 1970–1995, Political Studies, 54(3): 628–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00617.x
Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ercan, S. and Gagnon, J.P. (2014) The crisis of democracy, which crisis? Which democracy?, Democratic Theory, 1(2): 1–10. doi: 10.3167/dt.2014.010201
Farrell, D.M., Suiter, J., Harris, C. and Cunningham, K. (2019) The effects of mixed membership in a deliberative forum: the Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014, Political Studies, online first.
Fishkin, J.S. and Mansbridge, J. (2017) Introduction, Daedalus, 146(3): 6–13. doi: 10.1162/DAED_x_00442
Geissel, B. and Newton, K. (eds) (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, London: Routledge.
Goodin, R.E. and Dryzek, J.S. (2006) Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics, Politics & Society, 34(2): 219–44.
Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A. and Setälä, M. (2014) Deliberative Mini-publics – Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press.
Grönlund, K., Herne, K. and Setälä, M. (2015) Does enclave deliberation polarize opinions?, Political Behavior, 37(4): 995–1020.
Hendriks, C. and Lees-Marshment, J. (2018) Political leaders and public engagement: the hidden world of informal elite–citizen interaction, Political Studies, 67(3): 597–617. doi: 10.1177/0032321718791370
Hibbing, J. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy. Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Himmelroos, S., Rapeli, L. and Grönlund, K. (2017) Talking with like-minded people: equality and efficacy in enclave deliberation, The Social Science Journal, 54(2): 148–58. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2016.10.006
Jacquet, V. (2019) The role and the future of deliberative mini-publics: a citizen perspective, Political Studies, 67(3): 639–57. doi: 10.1177/0032321718794358
Jäske, M. (2019) Participatory innovations and maxi-publics: the influence of participation possibilities on perceived legitimacy at the local level in Finland, European Journal of Political Research, 58(2): 603–30.
Mattila, M. and Raunio, T. (2006) Cautious voters – supportive parties: opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension, European Union Politics, 7(4): 427–49. doi: 10.1177/1465116506069434
McLaverty, P. (2009) Is deliberative democracy the answer to representative democracy’s problems? A consideration of the UK government’s programme of citizens’ juries, Representation, 45(4): 379–89. doi: 10.1080/00344890903236957
Michels, A. (2011) Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2): 275–93. doi: 10.1177/0020852311399851
Mickelsson, R. (2015) Suomen puolueet – vapauden ajasta maailmantuskaan [Parties in Finland – From an era of freedom to ‘weltschmerz’], Tampere: Vastapaino.
Milner, H. (2002) Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Nabatchi, T. and Farrar, C. (2011) Bridging the Gap Between Public Officials and the Public (DDC), a report of the Deliberative Democracy Consortium, www.racialequitytools.org/resourcefiles/Bridging-the-Gap-between-Public-Officials-and-the-Public—DDC-exec-summary.pdf
Neblo, M.A., Esterling, K.M., Kennedy, R.P., Lazer, D.M.J. and Sokhey, A.E. (2010) Who wants to deliberate – and why?, American Political Science Review, 104(3): 566–83. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000298
Newton, K. (2012) Curing the democratic malaise with democratic innovations, in K. Newton and B. Geissel (eds) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, London: Routledge, pp 3–20.
Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, R. (2003) Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Posner, R. (2004) Smooth sailing, Legal Affairs, [available from https://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2004/feature_posner_janfeb04.msp, accessed 27 April, 2020]
Rose, J. (2009) Institutionalizing participation through citizen’s assemblies, in J. DeBardeleben and J. Pammett (eds) Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada, Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan, pp 214–32.
Setälä, M. (2017) Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making, European Journal of Political Research, 56(4): 846–63.
Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strandberg, K., Grönlund, K. and Himmelroos, S. (2019) Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization, International Political Science Review, 40(1): 41–57. doi: 10.1177/0192512117692136
White, S. (2017) Parliaments, constitutional conventions, and popular sovereignty, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2): 320–35. doi: 10.1177/1369148117700657
May 2022 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1511 | 790 | 31 |
Full Text Views | 165 | 26 | 2 |
PDF Downloads | 183 | 38 | 4 |
Institutional librarians can find more information about free trials here