Evidence & Policy
A journal of research, debate and practice

Right Here Right Now (RHRN) pilot study: testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health

View author details View Less
  • 1 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK
  • | 2 University of Edinburgh, , UK
  • | 3 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, , UK
  • | 4 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 5 Glasgow School of Art, , UK
  • | 6 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 7 Glasgow Caledonian University, , UK
  • | 8 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, , UK
  • | 9 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 10 Glasgow School of Art, , UK
  • | 11 NHS Health Scotland, , UK
  • | 12 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK
  • | 13 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 14 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK
Open access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Background

Informing policy and practice with up-to-date evidence on the social determinants of health is an ongoing challenge. One limitation of traditional approaches is the time-lag between identification of a policy or practice need and availability of results. The Right Here Right Now (RHRN) study piloted a near-real-time data-collection process to investigate whether this gap could be bridged.

Methods

A website was developed to facilitate the issue of questions, data capture and presentation of findings. Respondents were recruited using two distinct methods – a clustered random probability sample, and a quota sample from street stalls. Weekly four-part questions were issued by email, Short Messaging Service (SMS or text) or post. Quantitative data were descriptively summarised, qualitative data thematically analysed, and a summary report circulated two weeks after each question was issued. The pilot spanned 26 weeks.

Results

It proved possible to recruit and retain a panel of respondents providing quantitative and qualitative data on a range of issues. The samples were subject to similar recruitment and response biases as more traditional data-collection approaches. Participants valued the potential to influence change, and stakeholders were enthusiastic about the findings generated, despite reservations about the lack of sample representativeness. Stakeholders acknowledged that decision-making processes are not flexible enough to respond to weekly evidence.

Conclusion

RHRN produced a process for collecting near-real-time data for policy-relevant topics, although obtaining and maintaining representative samples was problematic. Adaptations were identified to inform a more sustainable model of near-real-time data collection and dissemination in the future.

  • 1 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK
  • | 2 University of Edinburgh, , UK
  • | 3 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, , UK
  • | 4 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 5 Glasgow School of Art, , UK
  • | 6 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 7 Glasgow Caledonian University, , UK
  • | 8 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, , UK
  • | 9 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 10 Glasgow School of Art, , UK
  • | 11 NHS Health Scotland, , UK
  • | 12 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK
  • | 13 University of Glasgow, , UK
  • | 14 Glasgow Centre for Population Health, , UK

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 3 3 3

Altmetrics

Dimensions