Policy & Politics
Advancing knowledge in public and social policy

Improving the political judgement of citizens: why the task environment matters

View author details View Less
  • 1 University of Groningen, The Netherlands
  • | 2 University of Southampton, UKand University of Canberra, Australia
Restricted access
Get eTOC alerts
Rights and permissions Cite this article

Internal political efficacy (that is, beliefs about one’s ability to process and participate effectively in politics) is known to be shaped by factors such as levels of interest in politics, trust in institutions and awareness of political developments and debates. In this article, we show that the task environment also has an impact on internal political efficacy, and that little research has been done on this issue. We draw on data from focus groups in Australia, where citizens were asked to make political judgements in contrasting task environments: state elections and the 2017 same-sex marriage plebiscite. We examine four features of task environments: framing choice; issue content; the nature of available cues; and whether the task environment stimulates cognitive effort. We conclude that concerns about the internal political efficacy of voters should be addressed by exploring how the task environment created for political choice might be made more amenable in order to improve the political judgement of citizens.

  • Achen, C.H. and Bartels, L.M. (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arcuri, L., Castelli, L., Galdi, S., Zogmaister, C. and Amadori, A. (2008) Predicting the vote: implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters, Political Psychology, 29(3): 36987. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00635.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barbour, R. and Morgan, D.L. (2017) A New Era in Focus Group Research: Challenges, Innovation and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Biggers, D.R. (2011) When ballot issues matter: social issue ballot measures and their impact on turnout, Political Behaviour, 33(1): 325. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9113-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brady, H.E., Verba, S. and Schlozman, K.L. (1995) Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation, American Political Science Review, 89: 27194. doi: 10.2307/2082425

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brennan, J. (2016) Against Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Burnett, C.M. (2019) Information and direct democracy: what voters learn about ballot measures and how it affects their votes, Electoral Studies, 57: 22344. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.12.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Campbell, A., Gurin, G. and Miller, W.E. (1954) The Voter Decides, Oxford: Row, Peterson and Co.

  • Caplan, B. (2007) The Myth of the Rational Voter, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Carmines, E.G. and Stimson, J.A. (1980) The two faces of issue voting, American Political Science Review, 74(1): 7891. doi: 10.2307/1955648

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, N., Jennings, W., Moss, J. and Stoker, G. (2019) The Good Politician: Folk Theories, Political Interaction, and the Rise of Anti-politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curtice, J. (2019) Diverse reactions: initial polling on Mr Johnson’s Brexit deal, https://whatukthinks.org/eu/author/johncurtice/

  • Cyr, J. (2014) The pitfalls and promise of focus groups as a data collection method, Sociological Methods and Research, 45(2): 23159. doi: 10.1177/0049124115570065

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalton, R. (2017) The Participation Gap, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fowler, A. (2013) Electoral and policy consequences of voter turnout: evidence from compulsory voting in Australia, Political Science Quarterly, 8: 15982. doi: 10.1561/100.00012055

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gamson, W.A. (1992) Talking Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2000) Adaptive Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007) Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious, New York, NY: Viking Press.

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008) Rationality for Mortals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2015) Simply Rational, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Goot, M. (1985) Electoral systems, in D. Aitkin (ed) Surveys of Australian Political Science, Sydney: Allen and Unwin, pp 179264.

  • Hardin, R. (2006) Trust, Cambridge: Polity.

  • Hill, L. (2002) On the reasonableness of compelling citizens to ‘vote’: the Australian case, Political Studies, 50: 80101. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00360

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kam, C.D. (2007) When duty calls, do citizens answer?, Journal of Politics, 69(1): 1729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00491.x

  • Kam, C.D. (2012) The psychological veracity of Zaller’s model, Critical Review, 24(4): 54567. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2012.788281

  • Kuklinski, J.H. and Quirk, P.J. (2000) Reconsidering the rational public: cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion, in A. Lupia, A.D. McCubbins and S.L. Popkin (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 15382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leruth, B. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (2019) Does political discourse matter? Comparing party positions and public attitudes on immigration in England, Politics, 39(2): 15469. doi: 10.1177/0263395718755566

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lijphart, A. (1997) Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma, American Political Science Review, 91(1): 114. doi: 10.2307/2952255

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lupia, A. (1994) Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections, American Political Science Review, 88: 6376. doi: 10.2307/2944882

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lupia, A. (2016) Uninformed: Why People Know so Little About Politics and What We can do About It, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D. and Popkin, S.L. (2000) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marcus, G., Neuman, W.R. and MacKuen, M. (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McAllister, I. and Snagovsky, F. (2018) Explaining voting in the 2017 Australian same-sex marriage plebiscite, Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(4): 40927. doi: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1504877

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mettler, S. (2011) The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, P. and Dassonneville, R. (2016) High turnout in the low countries: partisan effects of the abolition of compulsory voting in The Netherlands, Electoral Studies, 44: 13243. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.07.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F. and Kunz, R. (2014) Pathway to political participation: the influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters, American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5): 689700. doi: 10.1177/0002764213515220

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neilsen, M. (2012) Same-sex Marriage: Background Note, Canberra: Parliamentary Library.

  • Niemi, R.G., Craig, S.C. and Mattei, F. (1991) Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study, American Political Science Review, 85(4): 140713. doi: 10.2307/1963953

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Offe, C. (1999) How can we trust our fellow citizens?, in M. Warren (ed) Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 4287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Panagopoulos, C. (2008) The calculus of voting in compulsory voting systems, Political Behavior, 30: 45567. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9058-9

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Popkin, S.L. (1991) The Reasoning Voter, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Rahn, W.M. (2000) Affect as information: the role of public mood in political reasoning, in A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins and S.L. Popkin (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 13050.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlozman, K., Verba, S. and Brady, H. (2012) The Unheavenly Chorus, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: Harper & Brothers.

  • Simon, H. (1990) Invariants of human behaviour, Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 119. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245

  • Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A. and Tetlock, P.E. (1993) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. and Halperin, E. (2013) Making a difference: political efficacy and policy preference construction, British Journal of Political Science, 43(2): 295322. doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000324

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. and Brady, H. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zaller, J. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 1 University of Groningen, The Netherlands
  • | 2 University of Southampton, UKand University of Canberra, Australia

Content Metrics

May 2022 onwards Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 44 44 11
Full Text Views 25 25 0
PDF Downloads 18 18 0

Altmetrics

Dimensions